- Before
- Pieces each case together from emails, a spreadsheet and the policy PDF, then picks the clause from memory.
- Now
- “Give me the clause and the evidence; I'll make the call.” Opens each case rebuilt, costed and checked, asks the agents what she needs, and signs with a reason code.
One trade error, worked as a conversation: from a cash break to a client made whole
At Quillfield Capital, 120,000 Corvane Industrial shares bought for the Equity Income Fund were booked to the Global Value Fund. Nobody typed up a case: the agents opened it themselves, and the compliance officer works it with them in plain words. Here is the trade error resolution that follows, screen by screen, in the working solution.
- 01Monday, 11:40 a.m.
The agents have worked since 7:12; Nadia starts with what needs her
Nadia Rahman · Compliance officer, Trading ComplianceNadia's Today screen shows 23 open cases across 8 desks, 14 waiting for her (5 decisions, 1 question, 7 to close, 1 claim), $212,198 to correct in October and 4 repeat causes. Beside her queue sit the agents' conversation and what they did this morning: at 7:12 the Intake agent opened TE-2026-0318 from a cash break in Equity Income, and at 7:58 it merged Marcus Bell's report of the same error into it (96% match).
“Seven agents work these cases. Ask what they found, or tell them what to do.”
- 02One question
She asks the agents where to start
Nadia Rahman · Compliance officerNadia asks “What should I decide first?” The answer ranks her day: TE-2026-0318 first, then the four others due today, and TE-2026-0312, which waits for her answer on §3.1. One click on “Open TE-2026-0318” takes her to the case.
“Start with TE-2026-0318: $38,412.00, due today at 5:00 p.m., and the CCO still has to approve after you.”
- 038:05 a.m.
The order's life, rebuilt and cited line by line
Reconstruction agentFrom the order management system audit trail, the FIX log, central trade matching and the custodian, with a chat excerpt from the communications archive, the agent rebuilt 15 events. The error happened on October 15 at 9:44:31 a.m., when saved template US-VALUE-BLOCK v3 filled the account with Global Value and nobody changed it. The time-stamped allocation record (Rule 204-2) opens beside the timeline, and the missed chance is marked: a post-trade check on October 16 closed by operations as “model drift”.
The Reconstruction agent never edits a source system; it marks gaps instead of filling them.
- 0410:52 a.m.
A cost meter that ticks with the fills and refuses to net
Cost agent and Review agentDerek Lindqvist approved the trade error correction at 8:20: Global Value sold 120,000 at $40.9016 and Equity Income bought 120,000 at $41.1905. The meter built the cost fill by fill: $33,768.00 loss on the unwind, $3,600.00 in commissions on the wrong buy and the corrective sale, $144.00 in SEC Section 31 and FINRA fees, and $900.00 for the higher price Equity Income paid. A minute later the Review agent recomputed it from the raw fills on its own: $38,412.00, a match to the cent, all 19 citations open.
“No gain arose, and nothing is netted across clients (§2.5).” — Cost agent
- 05Before she signs
“Why doesn't the broker pay?” — asked and answered from the record
Cause agent and Policy agentThe Cause agent put the cause at 91%: the template filled the wrong fund and the trader did not change it. The Policy agent applied §2.3, the firm pays, routed the approval to the CCO under §4.2 and listed both funds' boards for the quarterly report. Nadia asks why not the broker, and the answer comes with the allocation record, the clause and the fills behind it.
“Because Kestrel did what we told it. Our allocation instruction at 4:12:33 p.m. named GVF-0412, Global Value, and Kestrel booked it exactly.”
- 06Signed
She decides with a reason code, and the case goes to the CCO
Nadia Rahman · Compliance officerThe approval shows the case, the decision (the firm pays $38,412.00), Trade Error Policy v5.1 §2.3, 37 cited sources with the Review agent's $0.00 difference, and the next step: Catherine Moreau, CCO (§4.2). Nadia picks “Policy applied as proposed”, ticks the signature box and sends it.
“I have reviewed the evidence and sign this decision.”
- 07Approved
The CCO approves on the same evidence
Catherine Moreau · Chief Compliance OfficerAt $25,000 or more the policy wants the CCO. Catherine sees who decided it and why, the clause and the evidence on one page, and approves as decided. Nadia could not have approved it herself: the maker of a decision can never check or approve it.
“Decided by Nadia Rahman · Policy applied as proposed.” Next: Derek Lindqvist to book the payment.
- 08Client whole
Booked from the error account, confirmed in both funds
Derek Lindqvist and Joanna PikeDerek books the drafted ledger entry: $38,412.00 from firm error account 9-ERR-001, $37,512.00 to Global Value and $900.00 to Equity Income, never from client commissions (§2.6). Nothing moves until he books it. Joanna Pike in fund accounting confirms both funds received the cash, and the case closes with every step signed and logged.
“Closed. The client is whole, two people signed, the payment is booked and confirmed.” — Policy agent
- 0911:02 a.m.
The third error on one template becomes a change request
Pattern agentThe Pattern agent linked the case to TE-2026-0251 (Hollis Rail) and TE-2026-0287 (Brightline Pharmaceuticals): three allocation errors on US-VALUE-BLOCK v3 in 60 days, $54,482 in all. Asked “Which fix would save the most?”, it names the size warning being built first (7 errors, $61,940 this year, CHG-55074), then this template, whose change request waits for Sam Deluca, Global Head of Trading. Fixes already in place show their errors before and since.
The Pattern agent never changes a system; a change request needs the Global Head of Trading.
- 10On every queue
The same conversation on the checks queue
Leah Brandt · Compliance managerEvery queue, report and setting has the agents beside it. Leah, who checks decisions under $25,000, asks “Which checks can I approve with one signature?” The Review agent names three, TE-2026-0316, TE-2026-0311 and TE-2026-0304: each under $25,000, decided by someone else, its total recomputed to the cent. Nothing is signed until she clicks “Review and sign them”.
Every action the agents propose waits for a person's click, and is logged.