SystemResearch & Discovery

Competitive Pipeline Tracking

Competitive pipeline tracking that shows who reads out before you — every date and claim with its source

Every rival trial, readout and approval in a sourced brief each Monday

See one case, screen by screen ↓
demo28changesfound by one Monday run across 5 watch lists and 1,284 sources, 6 of them significant
demo14of 14claims in the sample KRAS brief linked to the passage they came from
target36minto refresh the whole landscape, review included
target3daysfrom a rival's move to the programme team knowing, same day for approvals
The problem

Why the landscape is out of date by the time the deck is built

Pharma competitive intelligence is still assembled by hand. An analyst checks trial registries for record changes, reads sponsor press releases, pipeline pages and earnings-call transcripts, pulls numbers out of congress abstracts, looks up agency approvals in the US, EU and Japan, and pastes it all into a slide deck. Readout dates live in a spreadsheet and go stale. By the time the deck is built the landscape has moved, and the claims in it have lost their source, so nobody can check them.

Meanwhile there are more rivals to watch and no more people to watch them. Trinity Life Sciences, citing the TGaS Competitive Intelligence Landscape Survey, reports that the drug development pipeline has more than doubled in five years, while about two-thirds of CI leaders expect flat budgets and headcount. Missing a move costs real decisions — a comparator that changes under a Phase 3 design, sites a rival is about to open, a same-mechanism rival that will report Phase 3 data before your own Phase 3 starts.

demo4daysto refresh a landscape by hand (2025 analyst workload)
demo9daysmedian from a rival's move to the programme team hearing about it, by hand
demo6of 7rivals in plaque psoriasis with a readout or decision before our own topline
Where a landscape refresh's working hours goestimated
By hand32 days
With the solution0.6 days
  • Checking trial registries for record changes10 → 0.1 d
  • Reading press releases, pipeline pages and earnings calls7 → 0.1 d
  • Pulling congress abstract numbers into a table5 → 0.1 d
  • Checking US, EU and Japan approvals and filings3 → 0.1 d
  • Updating phases and readout dates in the deck3 → 0.1 d
  • Writing, sourcing and sending each team's brief4 → 0.3 d

Estimated split of one landscape refresh across five watch lists — about four working days by hand — and with the solution, analyst review included.

How it works

How a change moves

Six agents watch, place every move on the race board and write the brief; an analyst approves it.

What comes in
Sources in5 public sources · registries, news, earnings calls, congresses, agencies
Agents at work
Registry watcher
News watcher
Abstract reader
Approval watcher
Then
Change detectorrace board + readout clock
Then
Brief writerone page per team
A person decides
Analystapproves and sends
What comes out
Race board
Readout calendar
Weekly brief
One case, step by step

One Monday, from the watch run to a sent brief

Monday 5 October 2026, week 40. Lena Ortiz, the competitive intelligence lead, owns five watch lists and approves the KRAS, TL1A and psoriasis briefs every Monday morning. Here is her Monday, screen by screen, in the working solution.

  1. 01Monday, 06:00–06:14

    Four agents read every source before anyone is in

    Four watcher agents

    At 06:00 the weekly run starts on 5 watch lists and 49 assets. The Registry watcher checks 612 trial records and finds 18 changed; the News watcher reads 38 press releases and pipeline pages, 9 relevant; the Abstract reader matches the late-breaker LBA-71; the Approval watcher finds one new US approval. The Change detector merges 35 findings into 28 changes, 6 of them significant.

    “Monday's run landed · 06:14 — 3 moves on the Psoriasis board, each one with its source.”

  2. 02Morning

    The race board: who is ahead of IM-7740

    Lena Ortiz · Competitive intelligence lead

    Her home is a race board, one lane per indication, every rival on its phase and our oral IL-23 receptor peptide IM-7740 in dark blue in Phase 2. In moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis the lane header reads 5 ahead of IM-7740, 6 of 7 read out before us. Beside the board, this week's three moves are listed with their sources; ORX-23 and SLN-1723 trail an arrow from the phase they left.

    “I want to spend Monday deciding what it means, not finding out what happened.”

  3. 03One click

    ORX-23 jumps to Phase 3 — same mechanism as ours

    Change detector

    On the registry, NCT07166402 ORBIT-PSO-1 went from Not yet recruiting to Recruiting, with study start (actual) 3 October 2026, and Arlen Bio's pipeline page now lists ORX-23 in Phase 3. The marker slides from Phase 2 to Phase 3 and the lane re-sorts. Its countdown reads 18 months to primary completion in March 2028, and the panel shows both sources with the changed text marked.

    “Same mechanism as IM-7740 — its Phase 3 data are due before our Phase 3 is planned to start (Q2 2028).”

  4. 04Readouts

    A topline that moved a month earlier

    News watcher

    On Quillon Therapeutics' third-quarter results call on 1 October, management said QUILL-PSO-1 topline is now expected in December, ahead of prior guidance of January 2027. QLN-2319's countdown changes colour and the move is listed. The readouts page holds 59 readouts across every board, each with its source, and 3 rival readouts fall in the next 90 days.

    From the call: “Enrolment finished early, so we now expect topline data from QUILL-PSO-1 in December.”

  5. 05The KRAS board

    An approval and a first-line Phase 3 on NX-4127's board

    Lena Ortiz · Competitive intelligence lead

    On the KRAS board, VNT-224 moves from Filed to Approved, approved in the US on 2 October. SLN-0582 moves to Phase 3 with SOLSTICE-PANC registered on 1 October, 540 patients. KST-907 met its Phase 3 endpoint on 30 September, and OST-55 is new in the lane. In previously treated metastatic pancreatic cancer: 2 ahead of NX-4127, 4 of 6 read out before us.

  6. 06The landscape

    Fourteen assets by mechanism and phase

    Change detector

    The KRAS landscape places 14 watched assets by mechanism — G12C, G12D, pan-RAS, other alleles, pathway partners — against phase, with our NX-4127 in Phase 2 among the G12D inhibitors. This week: 11 changes, 3 significant. Each asset carries its lead indication, last change and threat to our programme.

  7. 07Before and after

    What the approval changes for NX-4127

    Approval watcher

    The change feed shows the VNT-224 approval at 99% confident, compared with last Monday's capture: status from Under review (priority) to Approved — United States; indication 2L+ metastatic PDAC, KRAS G12-mutant; OS 12.4 vs 6.8 months. The Change detector explains why it matters, and the approval letter and the sponsor's release sit beside it with the passage highlighted. Lena confirms it.

    “It sits in the same second-line population as our NX-4127 Phase 2, and becomes the treatment our next trial is likely to be compared with.”

  8. 08The brief

    One page for the KRAS G12D programme team

    Brief writer

    The week 40 KRAS brief has a three-line bottom line, what changed, what it means for NX-4127 with an owner for each action, also this week, and watch next — 14 claims, each linked to its passage. Priya Raman is to review the second-line Phase 3 design before the 2 Nov governance meeting; Jonas Weber is to check the 38 shared sites before site selection closes on 30 Oct.

    Checks beside the brief: “14 of 14 claims sourced · Numbers match the sources · One page.”

  9. 09Approve and send

    Nothing goes out until she approves

    Lena Ortiz · Competitive intelligence lead

    Before sending, the solution tells her 2 changes still need her confirmation — SLN-0582 and PLH-12 — and that approving the brief confirms them as written. She sees the 14 readers, from the programme lead to clinical operations, regulatory and market access, and sends it as an email with the brief as a PDF and on the programme team's page.

    “Your approval is recorded with your name and the time, and the sent version is kept.”

  10. 10Sent

    Fourteen people know on Monday morning

    Lena Ortiz · Competitive intelligence lead

    The brief is sent to 14 people on the KRAS G12D programme team. The activity trail shows each step: the Change detector found 11 changes, the Brief writer drafted 14 claims, Lena confirmed 9 of 11 changes, then the SLN-0582 and PLH-12 changes with the brief, and approved and sent it. Earlier that morning Sam Patel approved and sent the Claudin 18.2 and Lp(a) briefs.

Who it’s for

Built for everyone who needs to know who is ahead.

The same Monday, seen by the people who watch the race and the people who run in it — what their week looked like, and what it looks like now.

LO
Lena OrtizCompetitive intelligence lead · approves the KRAS, TL1A and psoriasis briefs
Competitive intelligence lead
Before
Spends the week finding out what happened — registries, newsrooms, abstracts and agency sites, pasted into a deck that is out of date by the time it is built.
Now
Opens a race board already updated, confirms the significant changes and approves each sourced brief on Monday morning.
SP
Sam PatelCompetitive intelligence analyst · approves the Claudin 18.2 and Lp(a) briefs
Competitive intelligence analyst
Before
“If it isn't sourced, it isn't in the brief” — so every claim in a hand-built deck had to be traced back by hand.
Now
Confirms changes with the before and after text side by side, and approves briefs where every claim already opens its passage.
EM
Dr. Elise MarchettiProgramme lead, IM-7740 · oral IL-23 receptor peptide in Phase 2b
Programme lead — Psoriasis
Before
“Tell me who reads out before us, and when” — and the answer lived in a spreadsheet that went stale.
Now
Sees every rival readout in plaque psoriasis counted down against IM-7740's Phase 2b topline, each date with its source.
MC
Dr. Maya ChenProgramme lead, NX-4127 · planning the first-line pancreatic Phase 3
Programme lead — KRAS G12D
Before
“If the comparator changes, I need to know that week, not at the quarterly review.”
Now
Reads one page each Monday that says what changed, what it means for NX-4127 and who owns each action.
JW
Jonas WeberClinical operations · closing NX-4127 site selection on 30 Oct
Clinical operations
Before
“Which of our shortlisted sites is a rival about to open?” — and he needs the answer before site selection closes.
Now
Is told the week SOLSTICE-PANC registers that 38 of its likely sites are on our feasibility shortlist.
Built on the engine

6 agents. Each with one job, and hard limits.

Six agents watch, place every move on the race board and write the brief; an analyst approves it.

Registry watcher

Checks trial registries every week for each watched asset and compares the current record with the last captured version — status, phase, study start, enrolment, dates, arms and sites — with the exact text before and after.

  • Public sources only
  • Never infers a status the record does not state
News watcher

Reads sponsor press releases, pipeline pages and earnings-call transcripts and captures any statement about a watched asset — phase, indication, filing, approval, data, partnership — keeping the exact sentence as evidence.

  • Public sources only
  • Quotes the exact sentence for every claim
Abstract reader

Reads congress abstracts and pulls design, population, endpoints such as PFS, OS, ORR and duration of response with confidence intervals, and grade 3 or higher adverse events into a comparable table.

  • Numbers are copied, never computed
  • Flags interim versus final data
Approval watcher

Checks agency approval databases in the US, EU and Japan for approvals, filing acceptances and label changes on watched assets.

  • Public sources only
  • Copies the indication word for word
Change detector

Merges what the watchers found into one change per real-world event, even when seen in three sources, scores its significance with the watch list's rules, explains in two sentences why it matters to our programme, places the move on the race board and updates the readout countdown.

  • Significant changes need an analyst's confirmation
  • Anything below 85% confidence goes to review
Brief writer

Writes the one-page weekly brief for each programme team — bottom line, what changed, what it means with a suggested owner, also this week, watch next — and links every claim to the passage it came from.

  • Every claim needs a source passage
  • No forecasts stated as fact
  • Never sends — an analyst approves first
Analyst

Approves before anything is sent. The agents propose; a named person decides.

Ask in plain words

Ask about any rival, in plain words

Ask about any rival asset, change or brief — or say what to watch. Every answer points to its source.

Who reads out before IM-7740?

In plaque psoriasis, 6 of 7 rivals have a readout or decision before IM-7740's Phase 2b topline in September 2027: among them QLN-2319's QUILL-PSO-1 topline in December 2026 (was January) and TYK-410's US decision on 12 June 2027. ORX-23 is the same mechanism as ours and dosed its first Phase 3 patient on 3 October — its Phase 3 completes in March 2028, before our Phase 3 is planned to start in Q2 2028.

What changed for KRAS this week?

This morning's run found 11 changes across the 14 KRAS assets, and 3 matter for NX-4127: VNT-224 approved, the first RAS medicine in second-line pancreatic cancer; SLN-0582 in Phase 3, the first G12D-selective medicine there, in first-line PDAC; and KST-907's Phase 3 met PFS in first-line lung cancer, HR 0.64. The other 8 are registry and pipeline updates, all in this week's brief.

How does the VNT-224 approval affect NX-4127?

Three things change. Comparator: a second-line Phase 3 would likely be compared with VNT-224, not chemotherapy. Benchmark: median OS to beat in second line is now 12.4 months (HR 0.46 vs chemotherapy). Timing: first line is still open — VNT-224 is approved only after prior therapy, and SLN-0582's first-line trial reads out around mid-2029.

Alert me the same day when a rival KRAS trial is stopped

Done. A new rule in What counts as significant — a watched trial is suspended, terminated or withdrawn — with a same-day alert to you and Sam Patel, outside the weekly brief. It would have fired once in the last 12 weeks, when MRL-209 was suspended on 23 September. The change is saved as a new version of the watch settings and is on the audit trail.

Every screen

The working solution, as it ships.

13 screens from the working solution, on its sample data. Pick one to see it large.

The race boardOne lane per indication, every rival on its phase and ours in dark blue, this week's moves with their sources and each next readout counted down.
Monday's runThe watchers run in view — registries, newsrooms, abstracts and agencies — before each move lands on the board.
One move, with its sourcesORX-23's stage path, the Phase 2 to Phase 3 move, its readout countdown against ours and the registry change with the old and new text.
The KRAS boardAn approval, a first-line Phase 3 and a Phase 3 readout on NX-4127's board, with the next readouts on this board.
ReadoutsEvery expected readout and decision on every board, on a timeline and by quarter — ours, rivals before ours and after, each with its source.
The landscapeWatched assets by mechanism and phase, this week's significant changes and every asset with its last change and threat.
The change feedEach change before and after, why it matters for our programme, its confidence and the source passages beside it.
BriefsOne brief per programme team each week, with its changes, claims sourced, stage and who approved and sent it.
The brief and its sourcesThe one-page brief beside every source passage, with the checks: claims sourced, numbers matching, one page.
Approve and sendChanges still to confirm, the readers on the programme team and how the brief is sent.
Sent, on the recordThe sent brief and its activity trail: what the agents did, what the analyst confirmed, who approved and when.
The dashboardChanges per week, days to minutes against the by-hand baseline, where changes came from and the change types that mattered.
Your rulesWatch lists and approvers, the run schedule, brief delivery, same-day alerts and what counts as significant.
Governance

Built for competitive intelligence you can defend: public, sourced, approved.

Public sources onlyThe agents read trial registries, sponsor releases and pipeline pages, earnings calls, congress abstracts and agency databases — no outreach and no non-public source.
Every claim and date opens its sourceEach claim in a brief and each readout date on the board links to the passage it came from, and the brief shows its checks — claims sourced, numbers matching the sources — before anyone approves it.
An analyst confirms what is significantThe Change detector proposes significance; a named analyst confirms it, and anything below 85% confidence goes to review.
Nothing is sent before approvalA brief goes to a programme team only after a named analyst approves it. The name and time are recorded, and the sent version is kept.
Each source version is keptRegistry records, pipeline pages and releases are captured version by version, so the record shows what the page said on the day.
Seven years on the audit trailRun history, confirmations, edits, rule changes and approvals are on the audit trail; run history and briefs are retained for 7 years.
Configuration

Your watch lists, your rules

What gets watched, when, what counts as significant and who approves are all settings — each change saved as a new version and recorded on the audit trail.

SettingDefaultChoose from
Watch runEvery Monday, 06:00 CETEvery Monday · Every Monday and Thursday · Every day, 06:00 CET
Brief deliveryAs soon as it is approvedAs soon as it is approved · Monday 12:00, if approved — never before an analyst approves
Same-day alertsOnApprovals and pivotal readouts reach the team mid-week, outside the brief · on or off
Approver per watch listLena Ortiz for Psoriasis, KRAS and TL1A; Sam Patel for Claudin 18.2 and Lp(a)Lena Ortiz · Sam Patel
What counts as significantApprovals, filings and label changes; pivotal readouts; phase advances; new trials in our indication; sites in our shortlist countriesEach rule on or off, also: trial stopped, suspended or terminated · primary completion moves more than 3 months
SourcesAll four, public sources onlyTrial registries (US, EU, Japan, China) · press releases and pipeline pages (126 companies) · congress abstracts (9 congresses) · agency approvals (US, EU, Japan)
PeopleCI lead and analyst approve; programme leads and medical affairs readApprover · Reader · Admin
Connections

Works with the sources competitive intelligence already reads

Trial registries4 registries in the US, EU, Japan and China — record history, study start, primary completion, sites
Press releases and pipeline pages126 sponsors' newsrooms and pipeline pages, each page version kept
Earnings callstranscripts, for development guidance and readout timing
Congress abstracts9 oncology, immunology and cardiology congresses, late-breakers included
Agency approval databasesapprovals, filing acceptances and label changes in the US, EU and Japan
Our development plansour own readout dates from the approved development plan, and the site feasibility shortlist
What it changes

The difference, in numbers.

Every figure is labelled: a target the solution is built to, an estimate, a typical published result, or a proven one.

target
36min
to refresh the whole landscape, review included
By hand≈ 4 days
With agents≈ 36 min
target
3days
from a rival’s move to the team knowing, same day for approvals
Told on day 3
median · was 9 days by hand
target
100%
of claims and readout dates linked to their source
every claim and date opens its source

“demo” = seen in the working solution, on its sample data — the 4-day and 9-day by-hand figures are the 2025 analyst workload shown on its dashboard · “target” = the design goal, measured in the live solution · “estimated” = our estimate · Published sources: TGaS Competitive Intelligence Landscape Survey (Oct 2025), via Trinity Life Sciences; 42 CFR Part 11 summaries (NLM, 2017); SCIP Code of Ethics. People, companies, assets, trials and registry numbers named on this page are fictional — characters and sample data in the working solution.

Questions

What competitive intelligence teams ask us.

What is competitive pipeline tracking?

Following every rival asset that matters to your development programmes — their trials, phases, readouts, filings and approvals — and telling each programme team what changed and what it means. Competitive Pipeline Tracking does this with six agents that read public sources every week, a race board per indication and a sourced one-page brief that an analyst approves before it is sent.

How is it different from a pharma competitive intelligence database?

It reads the public sources directly — registries, releases, pipeline pages, earnings calls, congresses and agencies — every week, for your watch lists and your programmes. It places each move against your own asset, counts down each rival's readout against your planned date, and writes your programme's "so what" with every claim linked to its source.

How does it track rival readout dates?

Each marker on the race board carries its next expected readout or decision — from the registry's primary completion date, a filing action date, a congress programme or earnings-call guidance — with a countdown, a before-us tag compared with your own planned readout, and the source one click away. When guidance moves, as QLN-2319's did from January to December, the countdown changes and the move is listed.

Why do trial registry changes matter so much?

Registry records move within weeks of a real event. Under 42 CFR Part 11 an applicable clinical trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov within 21 days of the first participant's enrolment, and recruitment status and completion dates are generally updated within 30 days of a change. The Registry watcher compares every watched record with its last captured version and records each changed field, before and after.

Does it use any non-public information?

No. The agents read public sources only — no outreach and no pretexting, in line with the SCIP Code of Ethics. Your own readout dates come from your approved development plan and are visible only to the programme team.

Do people stay in control of what is sent?

Yes. The Change detector proposes what is significant and an analyst confirms it; anything below 85% confidence goes to review. A brief is sent only after a named analyst approves it, with the name and time recorded and the sent version kept. Programme leads read and ask; they do not edit.

Can we set our own watch lists, schedule and significance rules?

Yes. Watch lists and their approvers, the run schedule (weekly, twice a week or daily), brief delivery, same-day alerts, the significance rules and the sources are all settings, each change saved as a new version on the audit trail.

How long does it take to go live?

The Agentic Solution Engine builds and deploys it from your requirements and documents — your watch lists, development plans and a sample of past landscape decks or briefs — and it goes live once every quality gate has passed. We will walk you through it on one of your own watch lists first.

See it on
your pipeline.

We'll run Competitive Pipeline Tracking on one of your own watch lists.