Learn · calls outside Regulation FD

Foreign private issuer calls: the earnings calls Reg FD does not cover

A foreign private issuer is a non-US company that meets the SEC's test for lighter reporting, and Regulation FD does not apply to it. Its earnings calls run on home-market rules, clocks and languages, so a global research team needs a map of jurisdictions rather than one US rule. Earnings Call Analysis reads those calls in the language spoken.

Updated · 14 min read

A foreign private issuer is a company organised outside the United States that the SEC lets report under lighter rules, provided it is not majority-owned by US residents while also run from or based in the US. It files an annual report on Form 20-F rather than 10-K, furnishes current reports on Form 6-K rather than 8-K, files no quarterly 10-Q, and is outside Regulation FD altogether. For a buy-side analyst that last point matters most: what a foreign private issuer's managers may say privately to analysts, and how quickly they must publish it, is set by the company's home market. Botminds' Earnings Call Analysis is software that reads earnings calls for buy-side research teams in the language spoken, many of them from companies outside the US. This guide explains the foreign private issuer test, what changes for the earnings call, and which home rules apply instead.

Foreign private issuers filing with the SEC, by the SEC's own count

967

companies filed annual reports on Form 20-F for fiscal year 2023

33.3%

of them were incorporated in the Cayman Islands

22.6%

were headquartered in mainland China

≈55%

traded almost exclusively in US markets, up from about 44% in fiscal 2014

SEC, Concept Release on Foreign Private Issuer Eligibility, Release 33-11376, June 4, 2025, drawing on a staff analysis of fiscal years 2003 to 2023. A further 146 Canadian issuers filed on Form 40-F. On October 27, 2026 the release remains a request for comment, with no proposed rule.Source: SEC Release 33-11376

What is a foreign private issuer?

Under the SEC's definition, a foreign private issuer is any foreign issuer other than a foreign government, unless it meets two conditions together: more than 50 percent of its voting securities are held of record by US residents, and either a majority of its executive officers or directors are US citizens or residents, more than 50 percent of its assets are in the US, or its business is "administered principally in the United States" (17 CFR 240.3b-4(c), eCFR current to Oct. 23, 2026). A company that meets both conditions is foreign by incorporation but reports as a domestic company.

Two details matter for analysts. The test is applied once a year, "as of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter", and a company that fails it switches to domestic forms from the first day of the next fiscal year. And foreign private issuer status matters for a company with SEC reporting obligations; some foreign companies held by global funds are not SEC registrants at all, trading in the US over the counter in reliance on an exemption, if at all. For those, no US disclosure rule applies to their calls.

The foreign private issuer test, step by step

The test is a short decision tree. A company whose voting shares are mostly held outside the US passes at the second step; the test bites on companies incorporated abroad whose shareholders, and also managers, assets or administration, are mostly American.

The foreign private issuer test in 17 CFR 240.3b-4

  1. 1
    Is it a foreign issuer, and not a foreign government?

    Incorporated or organised under the laws of a foreign country. If not, it is a domestic issuer.

  2. 2
    Do US residents hold more than 50% of its voting securities of record?

    Tested on the last business day of the second fiscal quarter. If no: it is a foreign private issuer.

  3. 3
    If yes, is any one of these true?

    A majority of executive officers or directors are US citizens or residents; more than 50% of assets are in the US; the business is administered principally in the US.

  4. →
    Any one true: not a foreign private issuer.

    It reports like a domestic company, with 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, from the first day of the next fiscal year. None true: it remains a foreign private issuer.

17 CFR 240.3b-4(c) and (e), eCFR text current to Oct. 23, 2026. A new registrant is tested within 30 days before filing its first registration statement. Shareholdings are counted under the method in Rule 12g3-2(a), with the adjustments the rule's note sets out.Source: 17 CFR 240.3b-4

The SEC asked in June 2025 whether the definition should change "in light of significant changes in the population of foreign private issuers since 2003" (SEC press release 2025-82, June 4, 2025): a shift toward companies incorporated in the Cayman Islands and headquartered in mainland China, and a rising share whose shares trade almost only in the US. The concept release floated options including a foreign trading volume test; comments closed on September 8, 2025, and the rulemaking page, last updated July 31, 2026, lists no proposal (SEC, File S7-2025-01). Any page that tells you the test has changed is ahead of the SEC.

Does Regulation FD apply to foreign private issuers?

No. Regulation FD applies to issuers with securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act or reporting under Section 15(d), "but not including any other investment company or any foreign government or foreign private issuer" (17 CFR 243.101(b)). The SEC had proposed to include them in 1999 and dropped them from the final rule in 2000, explaining that it had "determined to exempt foreign private issuers at this time as it has in the past exempted them from certain U.S. reporting requirements such as Forms 10-Q and 8-K", pending a review of their reporting.

"In the interim, we remind foreign private issuers of their obligations to make timely disclosure of material information pursuant to applicable SRO rules and policies, and our expectation that the markets will enforce these obligations."

SEC, Release 33-7881, adopting Regulation FD, August 2000

The exemption is not a licence to tip. The same release reminded foreign issuers that they "remain subject to liability for conduct that violates, and meets the jurisdictional requirements of, the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws". And it leaves the analyst exactly where Regulation FD in plain words describes: whether or not the issuer broke a rule, an adviser holding material nonpublic information must not misuse it, under its own written policies.

Do foreign companies file 8-K? What is a Form 6-K?

Foreign private issuers do not file Form 8-K. The 8-K duty "shall not apply to foreign governments, foreign private issuers required to make reports on Form 6-K" (17 CFR 240.13a-11(b)). Instead they furnish current reports on Form 6-K "promptly after the information in the report is made public", limited to what the company makes public under its home country's law, files with a stock exchange that publishes it, or sends to its security holders (SEC Release 33-11376, summarising General Instruction A to Form 6-K). The clock is the home market's; the 6-K follows it.

A domestic issuer and a foreign private issuer: the reports and rules that frame an earnings call

Domestic issuerForeign private issuer
Results release

Domestic issuer: Furnished on Form 8-K under Item 2.02; the call need not be furnished if it meets the 48-hour, open-access conditions.

Foreign private issuer: Furnished on Form 6-K promptly after it is made public at home; no Item 2.02 exemption logic.

Periodic reports

Domestic issuer: Form 10-Q for each of the first three quarters; 10-K within 60, 75 or 90 days of year-end.

Foreign private issuer: No 10-Q; annual report on Form 20-F within four months of year-end.

Selective disclosure

Domestic issuer: Regulation FD: public disclosure simultaneously, or promptly.

Foreign private issuer: Not covered by Regulation FD; home-market rules apply, plus US antifraud law.

Non-GAAP measures

Domestic issuer: Regulation G and Item 10(e) apply.

Foreign private issuer: Regulation G does not apply if listed abroad, the measure is not derived from US GAAP, and the disclosure is made outside the US.

Insider reporting

Domestic issuer: Section 16 reports by directors, officers and 10% holders.

Foreign private issuer: Directors and officers must report under Section 16(a) since March 18, 2026; Section 16(b) still does not apply.

Accounting

Domestic issuer: US GAAP.

Foreign private issuer: IFRS as issued by the IASB, US GAAP, or home GAAP reconciled to US GAAP.

SEC Release 33-11376 (June 4, 2025), section II.B, for accommodations; 17 CFR 244.100(c) for Regulation G; SEC Release 34-104903 (effective March 18, 2026) implementing the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act, enacted December 18, 2025.Source: Release 33-11376; 17 CFR 244.100; Release 34-104903

What changed for foreign private issuers in 2025 and 2026

One rule changed and one review is open. The Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act, enacted on December 18, 2025, amended Section 16(a) "to require directors and officers of a foreign private issuer with a class of equity securities registered under Section 12" to report their holdings and transactions; the SEC's implementing amendments took effect on March 18, 2026, and the Act did not amend Section 16(b), the short-swing profit rule (SEC Release 34-104903). For analysts that is a new data source on foreign companies' insiders, not a change to their calls.

The eligibility review is the other. The June 2025 concept release asked whether the definition still fits the companies using it; it is not a rule and, as of October 27, 2026, has produced no proposal. Neither development brings foreign private issuers under Regulation FD.

Home rules for selective disclosure: Japan, Korea and the UK

Outside the US, a company's private conversations with analysts are governed by its home market's rules, and several markets have their own fair disclosure regime. Japan added one to its Financial Instruments and Exchange Act in Article 27-36, with the Financial Services Agency's guidelines finalised on February 6, 2018 and enforced from April 1, 2018 (FSA, February 2018). The guidelines apply the rule to "information of a precise nature which has not been disclosed and which, if it were disclosed, is likely to have a material influence on the value of securities", and treat mosaic information and detailed explanations of information already disclosed separately (FSA Fair Disclosure Rule Guidelines, provisional translation, April 2018).

Selective-disclosure and disclosure-timing rules a global research team meets

MarketRuleWhat it requiresIn force
United States (domestic issuers)Regulation FD, 17 CFR 243Public disclosure simultaneously for an intentional selective disclosure; promptly, by the later of 24 hours or the next NYSE open, otherwise.Oct. 23, 2000
JapanFinancial Instruments and Exchange Act, Art. 27-36 (fair disclosure rule)A listed company that gives material information to a business associate must disclose it; the FSA guidelines set out what information to manage and how mosaic information is treated.Apr. 1, 2018
United KingdomUK MAR, Article 17"An issuer shall inform the public as soon as possible of inside information which directly concerns that issuer."Retained EU text
KoreaFSC rules on English disclosure, approved Jan. 28, 2026KOSPI companies with assets of KRW2 trillion or more must disclose in English from May 2026, including fair disclosure items; KRW10 trillion or more on the same day in principle, newly covered companies within three days.May 2026
17 CFR 243 (eCFR, Oct. 23, 2026); FSA Japan, Fair Disclosure Rule Guidelines (provisional translation, April 2018); UK MAR Article 17(1) on legislation.gov.uk; Financial Services Commission, Korea, press release of January 28, 2026. Our summary; check the current text before relying on it.Source: 17 CFR 243; FSA Japan; UK MAR Art. 17; FSC Korea

Korea's change matters for timing as much as language. The FSC's revised rules widen mandatory English disclosure from 111 companies to 265, and the regulator will seek to extend it to all KOSPI-listed companies, 848 of them, from March 2027 rather than May 2028 (FSC, January 28, 2026). Until then, for many Korean companies the authoritative text of a disclosure is the Korean one, and the English version, where there is one, may follow.

Do Japanese companies hold earnings calls in English?

Practice varies by company, so check each name's results calendar for the language of the call and of the materials; the sample company in this guide holds its call in Japanese and takes questions in English. What research shows is that the language of a call affects how the market hears it. Brochet, Naranjo and Yu, studying non-US firms' English-language calls, found that "the calls of firms in countries with greater language barriers are more likely to contain non-plain English and erroneous expressions", and that such calls "show lower intraday price movement and trading volume" (The Accounting Review, 2016). Firms that hired an English-speaking manager showed fewer of those problems.

The written side can run the other way. Lundholm, Rogo and Zhang found "foreign firms generally write clearer text and present relatively more numerical data than their U.S. firm counterparts", and that more readable disclosures attract more US institutional ownership (The Accounting Review, 2014). The practical reading for an analyst: trust the figures in the written release, and check every figure spoken in a second language against it. Cohen, Lou and Malloy found the same pattern of firms favouring bullish analysts in the Q&A in an international sample of calls from the UK, Canada, France and Japan as in the US (Management Science, 2020), so the question queue deserves the same scepticism abroad.

Earnings Call Analysis reads a Tokyo company's call in Japanese, with English beside every line

Earnings Call Analysis call screen for the fictional Hoshida Robotics, a Tokyo-listed company, Q2 FY3/27 results call, Thursday October 29, 2026, 3:00 to 3:58 p.m. Singapore time, Japanese with English questions, held in 5 funds. Side-by-side transcript lines in Japanese and English: the CFO at 00:27:30, orders from China fell 27% year on year; at 00:31:12, order backlog fell 12% quarter on quarter to ¥412.6 billion; an analyst's question at 00:33:40 about Chinese EV customers; the CEO at 00:34:18, we expect them to stay cautious at least through the end of the year. Four thesis pillars on the right.
Fictional sample company and data. A company listed only in Tokyo files nothing with the SEC; its call is governed by Japanese rules, and the solution reads it in Japanese, with every figure checked in both languages.

A jurisdiction map for the research team

A global team needs, for every covered name, four facts recorded once and checked each year: whether the company files with the SEC and in what status, domestic filer or foreign private issuer, or neither; which selective-disclosure rule governs its private conversations; which reporting calendar it follows, quarterly or half-yearly; and the language its authoritative disclosures and calls are in. The first decides whether Regulation FD is in play. The second decides what a compliance officer checks when a note cites a one-on-one. The third and fourth decide when the analyst's evening happens and whether it waits for a translation.

In Earnings Call Analysis those differences show up where they matter. The listener reads a call in the language spoken and the translator checks every figure in both languages, so a Japanese, Korean or German call is analysed while it runs rather than when the English arrives. The compliance agent holds any note citing a private meeting for research compliance whatever the issuer's home market, because the analyst's obligations do not stop where Regulation FD does. The transcripts page covers the data side, and Earnings Call Analysis shows a full evening across four languages.

Signed notes in Earnings Call Analysis from Japanese, Korean and Mandarin calls

Signed notes for a fictional portfolio manager in Earnings Call Analysis: Hoshida Robotics Q2 FY3/27 from a Japanese call, China demand Weakened and Margin to 15% Broken, signed today 6:42 p.m. SGT, 6:42 a.m. ET; Daeseong Motion Systems Q3 2026 from a Korean call, revenue outlook raised to ₩3.55 trillion, all pillars hold; Kanemura Precision Q2 FY3/27 from a Japanese call; Tsai-Lin Precision Equipment Q3 2026 from a Mandarin call, tariffs pillar Weakened; Oyama Servo Electric from a Japanese call.
Fictional sample data. Each note records the language of the call it came from; a portfolio manager in New York reads them at the open, whatever the market they came from.

Questions people ask

What is the foreign private issuer test?

A foreign company is a foreign private issuer unless more than 50% of its voting securities are held of record by US residents and, in addition, a majority of its executives or directors are US citizens or residents, more than half its assets are in the US, or it is administered principally in the US. The test is run on the last business day of the second fiscal quarter.

Do foreign private issuers have to file quarterly reports?

Not with the SEC. Foreign private issuers file no Form 10-Q; they furnish on Form 6-K whatever they publish at home, which for many markets includes quarterly or half-yearly results, and file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of year-end.

Can a foreign private issuer choose to follow Regulation FD?

A foreign private issuer can file on domestic forms, and the SEC's 2025 concept release notes that some file their annual reports on Form 10-K, but Regulation FD's text excludes foreign private issuers as a class. A company's own disclosure policy may promise similar practice; a research team can read it, but should not mistake it for the rule.

Are ADRs covered by Regulation FD?

An ADR program does not by itself change the issuer's status. If the underlying company is a foreign private issuer, Regulation FD does not apply to it; if it has no SEC reporting obligation at all, as with over-the-counter trading that relies on the Rule 12g3-2(b) exemption, no SEC disclosure rule applies to its calls.

What is the language barrier in earnings calls?

It is the effect of managers speaking in a second language on how clearly a call is understood. Peer-reviewed research found calls from countries with greater language barriers contain more non-plain English and errors, and move prices and volume less, which suggests listeners discount what they cannot clearly hear.

Earnings Call Analysis.
See it on your own files.

An agentic solution from Botminds. Turns each earnings call into a cited thesis-impact note for buy-side analysts, in any language Book a demo, or explore how it works.