Litigation Finance
Every funding request read and screened in a day, so lawyers spend their time on the few worth a deep look.
Why it matters
Funders screen hundreds of requests to fund a few; each needs pleadings, rulings, damages and the defendant’s ability to pay read by expensive lawyers.
How the solution handles it
Agents read the docket and pleadings, test the claims against rulings so far, check the damages model against the evidence, and look at whether the defendant can pay. A writer drafts a cited memo and term sheet. Investment counsel reviews; the investment committee decides to fund.
How a case request moves
Five agents read the docket, test merits, damages and collectability and draft the memo; the investment committee decides to fund.
What it reads, and what it hands back.
What goes in
- Complaint and key pleadings
- Court rulings and docket
- Damages model and expert reports
- Litigation budget
- Law firm engagement terms
What comes out
- Cited first-screen case memo
- Merits and damages summary
- Budget and duration check
- Term sheet draft for committee
Who uses it
The difference, in numbers.
Every figure is labelled: a target the solution is built to, an estimate, a typical published result, or a proven one.
“Target” = design goal, measured in the live solution · “Estimated” = our estimate · “Typical” = acceptance rates reported by funders (under 5–10%)
5 specialist agents. One person decides.
More in this division.
Every bridge loan’s exit tested at close and re-tested monthly, so a weak refinance shows up while there is time.
Fix-and-FlipEvery flip sized on the lesser of cost and after-repair value, and every draw checked against the scope.
Premium FinanceEvery premium finance agreement checked before funding, and every cancellation notice sent on the state’s clock.
Build this
for your team.
We’ll show Litigation Finance running on your own documents.