Submission Desk
Every broker submission read, cleared and checked against appetite, ready to quote the same day.
Why it matters
Submissions arrive as emails with ACORD forms, loss runs and SOVs; underwriters spend most of the day keying data, and good risks wait while the desk works through the pile.
How the solution handles it
Six agents read the email and attachments, pull ACORD and SOV data, analyse the loss runs, clear the risk against other brokers, check it against appetite and the binding authority, and prepare the rating inputs. The underwriter quotes, declines or refers.
How a submission moves
Six specialist agents read, extract, clear and match every submission; an underwriter quotes, declines or refers.
What it reads, and what it hands back.
What goes in
- Broker email and cover note
- ACORD 125 / 126 / 140
- Five-year loss runs
- Statement of values (SOV)
What comes out
- Ready-to-quote file
- Clearance record
- Appetite and authority check
- Broker reply draft
Who uses it
The difference, in numbers.
Every figure is labelled: a target the solution is built to, an estimate, a typical published result, or a proven one.
“Target” = design goal, measured in the live solution · “Estimated” = our estimate · agents = the live solution’s configuration
6 specialist agents. One person decides.
More in this division.
Every monthly bordereau checked row by row against the binder, with breaches flagged before the month closes.
Claims BordereauxEvery TPA claims bordereau checked against authority and reserves, with leakage flagged each month.
Authority AuditCoverholder audits that test every bound risk against the binder, with a cited draft report in days.
Build this
for your team.
We’ll show Submission Desk running on your own documents.