Life Underwriting
Every application read against its evidence, so the underwriter starts from a cited case summary.
Why it matters
Underwriters piece together applications, exam results and third-party data by hand; disclosure gaps surface late and cases stall.
How the solution handles it
Five agents read the application, gather the evidence, match every answer to it, check the underwriting manual rules and write a cited case summary. The life underwriter sets the rating and decides.
How an application moves
Five specialist agents read the application, gather evidence, check disclosures and the manual, and summarise; a life underwriter sets the rating.
What it reads, and what it hands back.
What goes in
- Application Parts I and II
- Paramedical exam and labs
- Prescription history
- MIB report
- Motor vehicle record
What comes out
- Cited case summary
- Disclosure gaps
- Manual rules check
- Requirements still open
Who uses it
The difference, in numbers.
Every figure is labelled: a target the solution is built to, an estimate, a typical published result, or a proven one.
“Target” = design goal, measured in the live solution · “typical” = published figures · “estimated” = our estimate
5 specialist agents. One person decides.
More in this division.
A 200-page APS becomes a short cited summary of every condition, value and date.
Death ClaimsEvery death claim checked and ready to pay well inside the 15-day clock, with interest worked out.
Contestable ReviewEvery contestable claim gets a cited review of what was disclosed and what the records show.
Build this
for your team.
We’ll show Life Underwriting running on your own documents.