Risk Engineering
Every survey report read, its recommendations tracked and its COPE facts in the underwriting file within a day.
Why it matters
Survey reports run to dozens of pages; underwriters skim them, recommendations go untracked, and differences from the statement of values surface after a loss.
How the solution handles it
Agents read each survey, pull construction, occupancy, protection and exposure facts, check sprinkler and hazard findings, reconcile them with the statement of values and track every recommendation. They write a cited risk summary; the property underwriter prices and decides.
How a survey moves
Five agents read the survey, check protection, reconcile it with the SOV, track every recommendation and write the summary; a property underwriter prices and decides.
What it reads, and what it hands back.
What goes in
- Risk engineering survey reports
- Statement of values (SOV)
- Sprinkler inspection and test records (NFPA 25)
- Site photos and plans
- Prior recommendations
What comes out
- Cited risk summary for the file
- Recommendation tracker with due dates
- SOV differences list
- Renewal survey brief
Who uses it
The difference, in numbers.
Every figure is labelled: a target the solution is built to, an estimate, a typical published result, or a proven one.
recommendations at renewal
“Target” = design goal, measured in the live solution · COPE = construction, occupancy, protection, exposure · NFPA 25 = sprinkler inspection, testing and maintenance · agents = the live solution’s configuration
5 specialist agents. One person decides.
More in this division.
Any underwriter asks a guideline question in plain words and gets an answer cited to the current manual page.
Referral DeskEvery risk above an underwriter’s authority reaches the right referrer with a cited summary and a clock.
Data PrefillEvery submission prefilled from permitted outside data, each value sourced and each conflict flagged for review.
Build this
for your team.
We’ll show Risk Engineering running on your own documents.