Reads each paper, scans and handwriting included, into passages with page and confidence.
- Never fills a blank; a low-confidence value goes to a person
Master service agreement management that stacks each agreement's amendments and rate letters in the order they took effect, so a field question gets the term that governed that day.
Follow one standby question from field to ERP ↓An oilfield service agreement is rarely one document. The agreement is signed, then amended, then repriced by rate letter, again and again. Each later paper changes some terms and leaves the rest, and they sit in different folders, some as scans with handwriting in the margin.
So when a field supervisor asks whether standby is billable and at what rate, the honest answer takes days of digging. Meanwhile the ERP's rate table was keyed from the latest rate letter and nothing else, and the invoice is paid on that.
Built forContract managersField superintendentsContract counselInternal auditors
Service agreements change by amendment and rate letter for years, and nobody can say which term governed on a date.
Looked up by hand today
Built-in controls
The field signs tickets on the term that governed that day, and the rate table is corrected from signed papers.
A wireline crew on an offshore platform was held for a day while the cranes worked the supply vessel. The ticket bills a full day of standby. The field superintendent asks before he signs.
demoVendors, platform, people, papers and rates are all sample data.
The library splits the agreements by business and status: in use, dormant but still in force, ended. Each row shows how many papers the agreement holds and what is open on it, such as rate lines that differ from the ERP. Every row opens the agreement as it stood on any date the reader picks.
The field ticket reads standby from 00:00 to 24:00 on well 14-118, unit and crew held while the platform's cranes worked a supply vessel backload. It is not yet signed by the company representative. The superintendent has to sign or query it, and he wants the answer from the papers, not from memory.
He types the question in plain words. The answer comes as of that day: billable, because the hold was the operator's own crane work; charged by the hour at one twenty-fourth of the daily rate; 12 hours at most. Each reason cites its passage, and the ticket check sets billed against what the papers allow: $4,800 against $2,400.
The papers sit as layers below the answer, newest on top. Sliding the date back to before the third amendment peels the later papers away. On that day standby was $3,900 a day under the 2021 rate letter and charged for the full day. The same question has a different answer on a different date, and the screen shows why.
Back on the asked day, he opens the rate letter's closing line. These rates replace the exhibit rates; all other terms of the agreement are unchanged. That is the argument a vendor would make for a full day at the new rate, and the letter's own words close it: the hourly cap from the amendment stands.
Hovering the amendment's layer lights its term: one twenty-fourth of the daily rate, an hour at a time, for no more than 12 hours in a calendar day, and only on a ticket signed showing hours and cause. The ticket check row turns green on what is allowed. He sends the answer to the ticket, and the ERP difference goes to the contract manager.
The correction sets the ERP's rate table beside the papers: $4,800 a day keyed from the rate letter, against $200 an hour, 12 hours a day at most, from the amendment and the letter. It shows what changes: corrections waiting on this business and the overpaid tickets earlier in the year. She proposes with a reason; a second person must sign.
Counsel does not sign a summary. Sign stays shut until he has opened the amendment and the 2024 rates himself, and both now read opened by you. He signs, and the correction joins the file that goes to the ERP. The decision lists the maker, the checker and when each acted.
The rate book check compares the rate lines in force in the papers with the ERP's rate table: 61,480 lines, 59,382 match, 1,904 differ and 194 are missing. The field correction sits on top. A batch for one business is built by the agents and signed only after counsel opens a random sample; held rows stay behind a question.
The arithmetic the answer shows, as of the day in question.
| Daily standby rate in force, 2024 rate letter | $4,800 |
| Hourly, at one twenty-fourth of the daily rate$4,800 / 24 | $200 |
| Hours allowed in a calendar day, amendment | 12 |
| Allowed for the day12 × $200; billed $4,800 | $2,400 |
demoSample data, from the working solution.
What the contract manager and counsel work through between field questions.
demoSample data, from the working solution.
They read, stack, answer and compare. People settle and sign.
Reads each paper, scans and handwriting included, into passages with page and confidence.
Orders each agreement's papers by when they took effect and rebuilds it as of any date.
Answers questions on money, terms and dates with the passage, as of the asked date.
Finds papers that change the same line in ways that cannot both hold.
Compares the rates in force with the ERP's table and proposes corrections.
Compares the cover the papers ask for with the current certificate.
Finds indemnity and liability wording a later paper changed.
The agents answer from the papers. These decisions are people's.
Master service agreement management keeps an operator's service agreements, amendments and rate letters in order so the right term is used. This solution stacks each master service agreement's papers in the order they took effect, rebuilds it as of any date, and answers questions with the passage and the arithmetic.
Each paper's layer records what it changed and what it left alone. A rate letter that replaces the rates leaves other terms, such as an hourly cap, in force, and the answer cites both.
The agent says it cannot tell and shows both passages side by side. A contract manager settles the conflict with a reason, and counsel signs.
It finds where the ERP's rate table differs from the papers and proposes corrections. Nothing reaches the ERP until the contract manager proposes and counsel signs, after opening the passages.
Yes. Each value is read with a confidence, and any value below the line is confirmed by a person against the page image.
No. It finds wording that a later paper changed or that differs from the standard form. Counsel reads it and records the reading.
Pick an agreement with its amendments and rate letters; we rebuild it as of a day you choose.