WorkflowCorporate Legal Department

Law Firm Panel Management

Law firm panel management that reads each proposal, ties each score to the page behind it, and sets an incumbent’s pitched discount beside the rates it actually billed.

Watch it work Book a walkthrough

Walk the review from request to talk sheet ↓

Watch with transcript →

The problem

The best pitch wins while the incumbent’s own invoices sit in another system

Every few years the department asks its outside firms to bid again for a place on the panel. The request is last cycle’s Word file, and the answers come back as proposals, pitch decks and rate cards in as many layouts as there are firms. Legal operations copies them into one spreadsheet, and the scorers mark each firm from memory.

By week three nobody can say which page earned a firm its score, and rates get compared as quoted. Meanwhile the e-billing system holds each incumbent’s real record with the company: the rates its timekeepers worked and the invoices the department had to cut. No scorer opens it, so a firm can promise a deep discount, bill above its card, and still come out on top.

Built forGeneral counselLegal operations leadersLegal procurement managersLitigation counsel

The Problem Today

Panel reviews compare firms as they pitched, while each incumbent’s real billing sits unread.

7.3%: growth in law firm worked rates in 2025 published
79%: of legal departments pressed to cut outside counsel spend published

Collated by hand today

Proposals
Scores
Rate cards
Invoices

Weeks of collatingHundreds of pages copied into one spreadsheet
Scores without a sourceNobody can show which page earned a firm its score

The Solution

Each proposal readRates, staffing, fees and conflicts pulled and pinned to their pages
Scored on weighted criteriaEach score proposed with its passage; a named lawyer confirms it
Pitched against billedEach incumbent’s promised rate is set against what it billed
Counsel shortlistsWeights moved live; the reason and negotiation points are logged

Built-in controls

Only the general counsel weighs and shortlists
Scorers recused from firms they worked at
Agents never contact a firm; procurement sends

What You Get

Legal departments choose firms they can defend to the CFO, on what each firm actually delivered.

2 days: to a scored, cited shortlist, down from about 3 weeks our estimate
$2.6M: a year in expected savings on $28M of litigation spend our estimate

A source behind each scoreCited to a proposal page or to the invoices
Discounts held to the cardNegotiation points built from what each firm billed
A panel that earns its placeFewer firms, each kept for the work it does best

Nine parts of one review

How law firm panel management runs, from the request to the talk sheets

Nine features, from the request every firm answers to the talk sheets counsel carries into each interview.

01Request for proposals
A request for proposals drafted from the panel scope and last review
How it works
- 64 questions in 8 sections, each section feeding one weighted criterion
- Drafted from the panel scope and the 2023 review
- Procurement approves and sends it: 14 firms invited, 11 answered
- Answer counts shown against each question
Legal procurement managerSends one request every firm answers in the same order, so the answers line up question by question with nothing to reformat.
02Proposal reader
Every rate and staffing figure pulled from a proposal, tied to its page
How it works
- 1,286 pages of proposals, pitch decks and rate cards read overnight
- Rates, staffing, fee offers, diversity and conflicts pulled into one panel
- Each pulled field links back to its proposal page
- The passages the agents used are highlighted in the proposal itself
Head of legal operationsEnds the copying of hundreds of pages into a side-by-side sheet, and lets anyone check a firm’s partner rate against page 14 in one click.
03Scorecard, on the pitch
A scorecard of every firm on weighted criteria, each cell cited
How it works
- 11 firms ranked as columns, 8 criteria as rows, each cell a score out of 10
- A click on a cell opens the passage behind its score
- Shaded columns sit inside the shortlist line, the top 3
- 77 of 88 scores cited while the invoices wait to be joined
General counselSees which firms earned the litigation work, and can answer the CFO’s question of why with the page behind each number.
04Score and its source
A score changed only with a reason, kept beside the agent’s proposal
How it works
- The scoring agent proposes each score from one passage
- A named scorer confirms it, or changes it with a reason that is required
- Here a new firm’s conflicts score drops from 7.5 to 6.0
- It acts for a competitor in a pending labeling suit
Deputy general counselCan overrule the agent on the record, so when the review is questioned later the changed score shows who changed it and on what grounds.
05Weights moved
Weights the general counsel moves, with every firm re-ranking at once
How it works
- Plus and minus on each of the 8 criteria in the weight rail
- Raising rates from 15 to 25 re-orders all 11 columns on the spot
- Weights that run over are scaled back to 100
- Each move lands in the audit trail
General counselTests whether the order holds when price counts for more, before deciding which weights the shortlist will stand on.
06Billing record
Each incumbent’s pitch set against what its invoices show it billed
How it works
- 4,918 invoices for 6 incumbents, FY2024 to FY2026, $63.2M
- Each billed rate checked against the agreed card
- One incumbent pitched 12% off and billed 9% above its card in FY2026
- New firms have no history, so they score at the panel median, 6.0
Head of legal operationsBrings the e-billing data legal operations already owns into the review, so a discount on paper is weighed against the rates actually worked.
07Scorecard, billing joined
A scorecard that re-ranks once each incumbent’s billing record joins
How it works
- The general counsel joins the invoices from the scorecard
- The billing row fills and the pitch leader falls from first to third
- 86.5 on the pitch becomes 76.5 with a billing score of 2.0
- 88 of 88 scores now cited, to a page or to invoices
General counselSees which firm earned the work on its record with the company before shortlisting anyone on the strength of a pitch.
08Rates and fees
Every firm’s rates side by side, incumbents costed at what they billed
How it works
- Partner card, discount, net rates and blended rate for all 11 firms
- Blended rates use each firm’s own proposed staffing
- A pitched blended $742 becomes $809 at FY2026 billing
- Fee arrangements sit beside the rates, with the page they appear on
Legal procurement managerCompares what each firm would really cost, so the deepest discount on paper is no longer taken for the cheapest firm.
09Talk sheet
Talk sheets for each shortlisted firm, every ask backed by its source
How it works
- Drafted for the 3 shortlisted firms as soon as the shortlist is set
- Four asks for the incumbent, from a 3-year rate freeze to billing guidelines
- Each ask carries its reason and its source in the invoices or a page
- The general counsel approves; procurement sends the interview letter
General counselWalks into each interview knowing what to ask for and why, with the invoice evidence at hand if the firm pushes back.

Six incumbents, three years of invoices, and one discount that never arrived

Each incumbent’s 2027 pitch beside its FY2026 billing against the agreed card; 435 of 4,918 invoices were cut.

Billed FY2024–26	Pitched for 2027	Billed vs card, FY2026	Invoices cut
$22.6M	12% off	9% above	230 of 1,642 (14%)
$13.9M	8% off	1% below	33 of 1,108 (3%)
$8.4M	6% off	4% above	63 of 704 (9%)
$7.2M	5% off	On the card	37 of 611 (6%)
$6.3M	7% off	6% above	54 of 489 (11%)
$4.8M	4% off	2% above	18 of 364 (5%)

More of the review

A conflict flagged, a reasoned shortlist and a panel cut from nine to three

Screens the general counsel, legal operations and internal audit open around the scorecard.

A new firm’s proposal at its conflicts page, the pending labeling suit for a competitor highlighted — **A conflict for the deputy to decide**A new firm discloses a pending labeling suit for a competitor. The conflicts checker flags it; the deputy general counsel cut the score from 7.5 to 6.0.

Shortlist dialog with three firms ticked at 84.3, 80.0 and 76.5 and the general counsel’s reason — **The shortlist, with its reason**The top 3 on the agreed weights, ticked. The reason keeps the incumbent for bet-the-company class actions, on condition it bills at its card.

An incumbent’s timekeepers above the agreed card, $669,000 over, beside why 230 invoices were cut — **Where the 9% came from**11 timekeepers above the agreed card in FY2026, $669,000 over, and why 230 invoices were cut: 128 for rates above the card.

Panel of nine firms with FY2026 spend and a recommendation each, beside the three recommended for 2027 — **Nine firms today, three for 2027**Each panel firm’s FY2026 spend, share and recommendation, and the three recommended firms with their terms: about $2.6M a year saved, estimated.

Audit trail with the weight moves, the invoice join and the shortlist, beside who held which duty — **Each weight move on the record**The person or agent and the reason behind each score, weight move, recusal and decision. Nobody can edit the trail.

Settings with 8 criteria and default weights totaling 100, the review rules and four connected sources — **The rules the review runs on**What a 10 means on each criterion and who scores it, the shortlist size, the new-firm median and the recusal window.

Procurement sends, scorers score, and only the general counsel shortlists

Duties are split so no one person writes the request, scores the firms and awards the work.

General counsel

Sees: The scorecard, the billing record beside each incumbent, and the drafted talk sheets
Signs: Sets the weights, records a reason for the shortlist, signs off the talk sheets and awards the panel

Head of legal operations

Sees: Each proposal with its pulled fields, and three years of the incumbents’ invoices
Signs: Runs the review, joins the billing data, and confirms the rates, fees and diversity scores

Deputy general counsel, litigation

Sees: Expertise, team, results and conflicts for each firm, with the passages behind them
Signs: Confirms or changes those scores with a reason, and decides each flagged conflict

Senior litigation counsel

Sees: The litigation criteria for the firm the deputy once worked at
Signs: Scores that firm in the deputy’s place, under the recusal rule

Legal procurement manager

Sees: The approved request, the approved talk sheets and the interview letters
Signs: Sends the request and each letter to a firm, and scores nothing

Behind the scorecard

Reading and drafting fall to six agents; the scores stay with named lawyers

What each agent prepares, and the call it hands back to people.

RFP drafting agent

Drafts the request from the panel scope, the last review and the criteria, and maps each question to a criterion.

Never sends anything to a firm

Proposal reader

Reads each proposal, pitch deck and rate card, and pulls rates, staffing, fee offers, results, diversity and conflicts with their pages.

Never fills a missing answer with a guess: it marks it unanswered

Scoring agent

Proposes a score out of 10 on each criterion and quotes the passage that supports it.

Never finalizes a score: a named scorer confirms it

Billing record agent

Joins three years of invoices per incumbent: rate promised against rate billed, invoices cut, timekeepers above card.

Never invents a history for a new firm: it uses the median setting

Conflicts checker

Compares each firm’s disclosed matters with the company’s affiliates, competitors and adverse parties.

Never clears a conflict: the deputy general counsel decides

Negotiation agent

Drafts the points to raise with each shortlisted firm, each with its source.

Never sends a talk sheet or letter
Never commits the company to a term

Law firm panel management, the questions a general counsel raises

What is law firm panel management?

Law firm panel management is how an in-house legal department chooses and reviews the outside firms on its panel. Here, agents draft the request, read each proposal, propose a cited score on each weighted criterion and set each incumbent’s pitch beside what it billed. The general counsel decides.

How does it score an incumbent on what it billed?

The billing record agent reads three years of each incumbent’s invoices from the e-billing system, checks each billed rate against the agreed card and counts the invoices cut, and why. That record is one weighted criterion, so a discount that never reached the invoices costs the firm ground.

Is a new firm penalized for having no billing history?

A firm with no invoices is scored at the panel median, a setting the department controls. It is neither rewarded nor marked down for having no record with the company.

Who confirms the scores, and how are recusals handled?

An agent proposes each score with its passage, and a named scorer confirms it or changes it with a reason. A scorer who worked at a firm within the recusal window cannot open its scores; another lawyer scores it instead, and the audit trail records both.

Does it help with panel convergence?

The panel screen shows each current firm’s spend, share and recommendation beside the recommended new panel. The department sees which firms to keep, which to hold as a bench for overflow, and which to exit when their terms end.

Corporate Legal Department