Counts, opens and checks each batch against the document register.
- Never edits a contractor file
- Counts held files, never skips them
CMMS data build that turns a contractor's handover into tags, reasoned plans and spares in the maintenance system before first gas.
Follow one gas train from 06:00 to Wave 1 going live ↓The contractor sends the tag register, datasheets, drawings, manuals and spare parts forms in batches. A readiness team checks them in spreadsheets and emails the gaps back. Under the clock, plans get set from a library by equipment type, and the reason behind each one never reaches the maintenance system.
Spares are built last. Some lists sit bound inside vendor data books that nobody indexed, and lead times get compared with startup late, if at all. The load is tried in a test copy, and reconciling it afterward is a count, if there is time.
Built forReadiness leadsMaintenance managersMaintenance engineersCommissioning engineersAsset data owners
A new plant arrives as a mass of contractor data, and plans get loaded with no reason behind them.
Keyed by hand today
Built-in controls
Maintenance takes over a plant it can work on, and each plan can still say why it exists years later.
A new gas train is weeks from first gas. One compressor's seal gas skid has no spares list, and a whole wave of tags waits to load. Here is that morning, on the working screens.
demoThe gas train, its contractor, the people and every figure shown are sample data.
Fourteen commissioning systems stand as towers in the order gas enters, each with five lights: tags, strategy, task lists, spares and drawings. 43 lights are green, 6 carry a startup risk, 15 wait for a person and 6 are out. The question across the top is the one the lead answers to: on the first day, can we maintain this train?
Inlet compression's spares light leads to seal gas skid 210-PK-3104. The spare parts register has lists for the skids on either side of it and nothing for this one. The purchase order says a data book came with the unit, so the list may be bound inside it. If it is not there either, the gap goes back to the contractor as a notice.
The agent reads the data book and finds the recommended spares on volume 3, page 412: 6 lines, $105,270, none in stores. Four wear parts land in time. The seal gas booster and the heater element take 26 weeks, so they land 143 days after first gas. Beside each, one line says what the part does and what its absence risks.
The lead proposes the list with a note: found bound into the data book, none of the 6 in stores. The manager cannot sign on his word. She opens page 412 herself, the six lines with maker part numbers, prices and lead times, and only her own opening counts. After a send-back, the count resets and she opens it again.
Her reason is agree, with a startup risk, and her note says what she saw: the booster and heater element land 143 days after first gas. The bill of material shows one booster and one heater installed, so the risk is the missing spare, not the skid. At 09:40 she raises it as startup risk SR-08.
At 09:44 the lead sends the signed list to purchasing as a requisition, marked as not yet ordered. The commissioning engineer then acknowledges SR-08 with an action, asking the maker for an earlier slot, and a note of his own. Until he does, the lamp stays amber.
Back on the board, the spares light on inlet compression is violet, which means signed with a startup risk that has an owner and an action. The count now reads 7 startup risks and 5 lights out. Green stays reserved for a light with a sign-off record and nothing late behind it.
The library set the brazed aluminum cold boxes by exchanger type: pull the bundle and hydro-jet every 4 years. The maker's manual says brazed cores have no bundle and cannot be opened. With very cold gas and mercury in the feed, a cracked core stops the train. Monthly trending is the choice on her screen, with its reason drafted for the plan, and she must open three of the plans before she can propose it.
Wave 1 is tags and locations: 1,298,640 lines received, 103,071 held back, 1,191,351 accepted by the test copy. Before signing she opens each of the 5 sample records, among them the seal gas skid and a cold box core. The wave's state stays waiting for a signature until all five are opened.
The person who signs never releases. The administrator releases Wave 1 once, and the reconciler reads the live copy back against the test copy: 1,191,351 of 1,191,351. Four waves remain to propose. Lines signed after their wave go to a catch-up load that takes the same three people.
The recommended spares for the seal gas skid, as the data book gives them, with lead times if ordered two days after the find.
| Spare | Kind | Qty | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coalescing filter element | Wear | 8 | 3 wk |
| Particulate filter element, 1 micron | Wear | 8 | 3 wk |
| Differential pressure transmitter | Wear | 1 | 4 wk |
| Pressure regulator repair kit | Wear | 2 | 5 wk |
| Seal gas booster, complete | Insurance | 1 | 26 wk |
| Seal gas heater element | Insurance | 1 | 26 wk |
demoSample data, from the working solution. $105,270 in all. The two insurance spares land 143 days after first gas, and the skid has one of each installed.
Where the readiness team works between lights, on this train, each enlarged on a click.
demoSample data, from the working solution.
Each received line has one route. The six routes add back to what the contractor sent.
| Live in the maintenance system, read back | 1,191,351 |
| Ready: accepted by the test copy, or signed | 997,012 |
| With a person, waiting for a signature | 135,428 |
| With a contractor, waiting for an answer | 2,130 |
| Refused, waiting for a fix | 7,848 |
| No route yet: their notice has not gone out | 79,091 |
| Data lines received | 2,412,860 |
demoSample data, from the working solution.
Each one checks or builds, and shows its source. People propose, sign and release.
Counts, opens and checks each batch against the document register.
Checks names and places tags in the plant tree from the drawings.
Attaches a reason to each plan and flags the generic ones.
Writes task lists from the exact maker's manual.
Finds lists, checks stores and compares lead times with first gas.
Drafts notices to contractors and re-checks each answer.
Runs the dry run, explains refusals and reads back what loaded.
Agents read these and write to none of them. The live maintenance system changes only through a released wave.
A CMMS data build is the work of loading a new plant's tags, functional locations, preventive plans, task lists, spares and document links into the maintenance system before it starts up. Here agents check the contractor's handover and build the records, each with its source, and people propose, sign and release each load.
The readiness lead sees each commissioning system in the order gas enters, with five lights that say what is signed, what carries a startup risk, what waits for a person and what is missing. A late spare reaches a named owner with an action weeks before the part is needed.
The task lists and the plan's reason wait. The agents will not write either from a generic model, and the gap goes back to the contractor on a notice that a second person signs. When the file comes, it is re-checked before the notice can close.
Each batch is counted, opened and checked against the master document register before anyone relies on it. Files that cannot be opened are counted and sent back, never skipped. Tag names are checked against your standard, and a missing value goes to the contractor rather than being guessed.
Nobody alone. The readiness lead proposes a wave, the maintenance manager opens a sample of its records and signs, and the maintenance systems administrator releases it, once. The reconciler then reads the live system back against the test copy.
Only with a written reason, and only with a second signature from the process safety authority as well as the maintenance manager. Safety-critical families such as relief valves, gas detectors and burner proof tests take that second signature in any case.
Vague closeout notes traced to the real failure cause, each code tied to its note.
1-min demoRoot Cause Failure AnalysisThe real cause signed, and the sister pump caught still running.
1-min demoMaintenance and Inspection Deferral ManagementEach deferral judged with everything it leans on, not alone.
1-min demoWe’ll show the gaps, the generic plans and the late spares that one batch already holds.