TBML Review
Every flagged trade arrives as a cited case, with price, route and parties already tested.
Why it matters
Over- and under-invoicing, phantom shipments and odd routings hide in normal-looking documents; reviewers rarely have time to test price and route against the market.
How the solution handles it
Agents read the trade file, test unit prices and quantities against market data and the customer’s profile, check routes, transhipment and parties, and match the FATF–Egmont risk indicators. A writer drafts a cited case narrative and any questions for the customer. An AML investigator decides whether to file.
How a trade is reviewed
Five agents read the trade, test price, quantity, route and parties, match red flags and draft the case; an AML investigator decides on a report.
What it reads, and what it hands back.
What goes in
- Invoices and contracts
- Transport documents
- Customs data (shipping bills, bills of entry via EDPMS/IDPMS)
- Customer KYC and trade profile
- Payment messages
What comes out
- Cited case narrative
- Red-flag findings with reasons
- Suggested RFI to the customer
- SAR / STR decision record
Who uses it
The difference, in numbers.
Every figure is labelled: a target the solution is built to, an estimate, a typical published result, or a proven one.
parties, activity, documents, accounts
“Target” = design goal, measured in the live solution · FATF–Egmont Group, Trade-Based Money Laundering: Risk Indicators (2021) · Wolfsberg Trade Finance Principles · the investigator decides every filing
5 specialist agents. One person decides.
More in this division.
Every presentation checked in hours against the credit, UCP 600 and ISBP, well inside five banking days.
Sanctions & Dual-UseEvery party, vessel and good screened with the reason shown, so analysts clear false hits fast.
Guarantee DraftingEvery guarantee drafted in your approved wording, with each beneficiary change flagged before it binds the bank.
Build this
for your team.
We’ll show TBML Review running on your own documents.