WorkflowSanctions Screening

Sanctions Ownership & Control

Sanctions ownership and control as one bar to the 50% line, every blocked share traced to its source

Every blocked share traced to its source; the 50% call made while the payment is held.

See one case, screen by screen ↓
demo52%owned by blocked persons on the sample counterparty, which is on no sanctions list: 28% direct, 24% through Halcyon Bay
demo3minutesfor the agents to read three registries, a certification and two trade documents and build the cited stack
demo2hoursinside the clock: the held $1,846,500 wire blocked at 8:55 AM against a 10:58 AM deadline
target100%of counted shares and memo sentences cite a registry line or document
In short

What is Sanctions Ownership & Control?

Sanctions Ownership and Control is software for bank sanctions teams that finds companies owned 50% or more by sanctioned persons, through every layer, even when the company is on no list. Seven agents build the ownership tree from registry extracts, read the customer's certification and trade documents, match every owner to the OFAC lists and add the blocked shares under OFAC's 50 Percent Rule. The answer is one bar against the 50% line, each part traced to its registry line, for a Sanctions Analyst to prepare and a Sanctions Officer to decide.

AI use cases in banking: a buyer's guide to agentic AI for bank and credit union operations →

Updated

The problem

Why the OFAC 50 Percent Rule is hard to apply while a payment waits

Sanctions ownership and control starts from one rule: a company owned 50% or more, in aggregate, by people on OFAC's blocked lists is itself blocked, even when it appears on no list. Name screening finds names on lists, so it stays silent. To find these companies, an analyst builds the ownership tree layer by layer from registry printouts, reads the customer's own certification, matches every owner to the lists and adds the shares in a spreadsheet, while a held payment waits.

The math is easy to get wrong. OFAC counts the whole stake of a company that blocked persons own 50% or more, and never multiplies through one they don't; two listed holders of 25% each already reach the line. The customer's certification may contradict the registry, free-zone and offshore layers file little, and owners move shares just after a designation to look smaller on paper. A listed manager does not block a company, but adding that control to the percentage overstates the case, and leaving it out hides it.

typical50%or more owned by blocked persons, in aggregate, and a company is blocked even when it is on no list
typical10business daysto report a blocked payment to OFAC
estimated½–1dayof an analyst's time for a deep ownership review done by hand
Where a deep ownership review's hours goestimated
By hand7.5 hours
With the solution0.9 hours
  • Pulling registry extracts, one layer at a time2 → 0.1 h
  • Reading the certification and the trade documents1 → 0.1 h
  • Matching every owner to the sanctions lists1 → 0.1 h
  • Adding the blocked shares the OFAC way1 → 0.1 h
  • Checking transfers against designation dates1 → 0.1 h
  • Writing the memo, checking it and deciding1.5 → 0.6 h

Estimated split of one deep review (a three-layer tree with one offshore layer) by hand and with the solution, from the demo bank's design; not a published figure.

How it works

How one counterparty's review moves

Seven agents build the tree through every layer, add blocked shares OFAC's way and replay transfers against designations; an analyst prepares and an officer decides.

What comes in
What is read5 sources · registries, certification, trade documents, lists
Agents at work
Registry agentevery layer
Document readercertification, trade docs
Then
Identity agentevery owner vs the lists
Then
Ownership calculatorstack to 50%
Restructuring watchtransfers vs designation
Then
Memo writerevery sentence cited
A person decides
Sanctions Analyst prepares, Sanctions Officer decidesnever the same person
What comes out
Block, reject or clear
Report of blocked property
Examiner pack
One case, step by step

Sanctions ownership and control on one held wire, from hold to block

Thursday, October 22, 2026, at Corvane National Bank. At 6:58 AM the payments hub holds a $1,846,500.00 wire from Harlow Ridge Machinery Inc. in Houston to Varnholt Logistics FZE in the Jebel Ali Free Zone, Dubai, for freight forwarding and bonded warehousing. Varnholt is on no list. The clock is four business hours: decide by 10:58 AM. Here is what happens next, screen by screen, in the working solution.

  1. 01Morning

    The held wire, first in a queue sorted by clock

    Nadia Okafor · Sanctions Analyst

    Nadia's reviews come from payment holds, trade finance, correspondent banking, list updates and periodic reviews: 41 open, 7 needing a decision, 8 ready to prepare and 15 still with the agents. Varnholt Logistics FZE leads with 2h 18m left. A banner says the registry data service did not answer from 6:10 to 6:25 AM, and that four trees were rebuilt.

    “Varnholt Logistics FZE is on no list, but 52% of it is owned by a blocked person. The $1,846,500 wire must be decided by 10:58 AM.”

  2. 026:58 to 7:01 AM

    One bar to the 50% line: 28% + 24% = 52%

    Seven agents

    The Registry agent pulled three registry extracts, the Document reader read the certification and two trade documents, and the Identity agent matched Gennady Orlek (0.98) and Kasimir Volden (0.97) to the SDN list. The Ownership calculator stacks what blocked persons own: Orlek's 28% directly and Halcyon Bay's 24%. Orrin Tradeco's 3% and Calder Wynn's 45% stay gray, not counted. The total is 52%, two points over the line.

    “Blocked under the 50 Percent Rule, though it appears on no list.”

  3. 03One click

    Why Halcyon Bay's whole 24% counts

    Ownership calculator

    The 24% part opens its path: Gennady Orlek owns 600 of Halcyon Bay's 1,000 shares, 60%, so Halcyon Bay is blocked too, and its 240 of Varnholt's 1,000 shares count in full. The tree shows nine nodes, every edge with its share and source, and the listed manager joined by a dashed line: control, not counted.

    The Ownership calculator never multiplies through a company that blocked persons do not own 50% or more, and never adds control to ownership.

  4. 04Three sources

    The customer's certification, checked against the registry

    Document reader

    Varnholt certified on August 28 that Halcyon Bay is owned by private investors, none sanctioned, and that nothing material changed in 12 months. The registry says Orlek owns 60% of Halcyon Bay, and shows two transfers, on July 10 and August 21. Two conflicts and one gap are shown, never averaged, and the registry is preferred. One click drafts a request for documents, which a second person approves.

    “Certification is wrong.” · “Certification omits them.”

  5. 05Any number

    The registry line that decides the case

    Nadia Okafor · Sanctions Analyst

    Every value is a citation. R2 opens the Halcyon Bay registry extract from Cyprus, dated October 20, 2026, with the line that matters lit: Gennady Orlek, 600 of 1,000 shares (60%). Halcyon Bay was incorporated on May 29, 2026, and its registered office is a corporate services address shared by 212 companies.

  6. 06Below the bar

    Control kept apart, and shares that moved but never left

    Restructuring watch

    Control concerns are listed under the bar and never added. Kasimir Volden, on the SDN list, is general manager and sole signatory. Orrin Tradeco, formed nine days before it bought 3% from Orlek, is owned by his former CFO. A clause lets Varnholt assign receivables to Halcyon Bay. The history shows Orlek at 55% before his June 12 designation, 48% on paper on July 10 and 28% on August 21, while the traced blocked share went 55%, 55%, 52%.

    “The shares moved; they never left him.”

  7. 078:47 AM

    She checks what the answer hinges on, and prepares a block

    Nadia Okafor · Sanctions Analyst

    The Memo writer has drafted six paragraphs with 14 citations, which Nadia can edit. Send stays disabled until she ticks five checks: Halcyon Bay is 60% Orlek's, the registry's Orlek is the listed Orlek, he still holds 280 shares, and she has read the control concerns and the transfer history. She keeps the agents' proposal, Block at 0.97 confidence, with four reason codes: OWN-50, RST-1, CTL-1 and SRC-2.

    Hinge fact: “If it were below 50%, Halcyon's 24% would not count, and the total would be 28%.”

  8. 08Decide

    The analyst who prepared cannot decide

    Nadia Okafor · Sanctions Analyst

    Signed in as Nadia, the Decide screen refuses her: she prepared the review. The prepared case waits for the Sanctions Officer: 52% blocked, the recommendation and its four codes, and two flags, a listed signatory and two transfers after the designation.

    “You prepared this review, so you cannot decide it. Separation of duties: a Sanctions Officer decides.”

  9. 098:55 AM

    The Sanctions Officer blocks the payment

    Martin Lisle · Sanctions Officer

    Martin chooses between block, reject, clear and return to the analyst, each with its reason code. He blocks with BLK-50, property of an entity blocked under the 50 Percent Rule, and the note for the record is prefilled from the memo. A clear over the line would have gone to the Head of Sanctions to co-sign.

    “Block the payment: funds go to a blocked, interest-bearing account; report to OFAC in 10 business days.”

  10. 10Handed off

    Funds blocked, the OFAC report drafted, the referral confidential

    Memo writer and the systems of record

    The payments hub moves $1,846,500.00 to blocked account BLK-26-0091, and trade finance marks Varnholt and Halcyon Bay as blocked parties. The Memo writer drafts the report of blocked property, due November 5, 2026, and a notice to Harlow Ridge Machinery that names the regulation only; both wait for a second person. Adding both companies to the internal blocked-entity list waits for the Head of Sanctions. Referral FIU-26-2231 goes to financial intelligence and appears on no customer-facing view.

    Blocked 1 hour 57 minutes after the hold, two hours inside the clock.

Who it’s for

Built for everyone who carries a sanctions review.

The same held wire, seen by four of the people it passes: what their week looked like, and what it looks like now.

NO
Nadia OkaforSanctions Analyst · prepares, never decides
Sanctions Analyst
Before
Works 12–15 ownership reviews at a time, pulling registries layer by layer and rebuilding the math in a spreadsheet while a payment waits.
Now
Opens a stack already built and cited, checks the three facts it hinges on and sends a cited memo to the officer.
ML
Martin LisleSanctions Officer · blocks, rejects or clears
Sanctions Officer
Before
Decides block, reject or clear on a memo whose numbers were copied from PDFs, with the link to the page lost.
Now
Sees what the answer hinges on, the reason codes and the memo as prepared, then decides with a reason code and a note.
OP
Owen PrescottHead of Sanctions · sets the policy, co-signs clears near the line
Head of Sanctions
Before
Answers for counterparties a new designation touches, and for transfers timed to drop an owner below the line.
Now
Sees every tree on file checked again when the lists change, approves list changes and settings, and co-signs clears in the watch band.
HB
Hugo BrandvoldInternal Auditor · reads and exports, changes nothing
Internal Auditor
Before
Pieces together who decided, on what evidence and from which registry line, from emails, spreadsheets and printouts.
Now
Builds one sealed pack: the decision, stack, tree, sources, history, agent versions and trail, with passport and account numbers masked.
Built on the engine

7 agents. Each with one job, and hard limits.

Seven agents build the tree through every layer, add blocked shares OFAC's way and replay transfers against designations; an analyst prepares and an officer decides.

Review coordinator

Opens a review from a payment hold, a trade finance request, a list update or a periodic review, runs the other agents in order, keeps the clock for the trigger and hands the prepared review to a named Sanctions Analyst.

  • Never decides
  • Stops and alerts when a source does not answer
Registry agent

Pulls a registry extract no more than 30 days old for every company in the chain: shareholders with share counts, officers and every dated transfer.

  • Never guesses a missing layer; it is marked unknown
Document reader

Reads the customer's ownership certification, invoices, agreements and bills of lading, and keeps every owner, officer, signatory and affiliate with its page.

  • Never fills a field it cannot cite
  • Field confidence 0.90 or more
Identity agent

Matches every person and company in the tree to the OFAC SDN and non-SDN lists and the bank's internal list, comparing name, birth date, nationality and identifiers.

  • Below 0.90 a person confirms the match
Ownership calculator

Applies the 50 Percent Rule: adds blocked persons' direct shares and the whole stakes of companies they own 50% or more, builds the stack and lists the facts the answer hinges on.

  • Never adds control to ownership
  • Never multiplies through a company that is not blocked
Restructuring watch

Replays every transfer within 180 days after or 30 days before a designation, and flags drops below the line on paper, transfers to family, associates or new companies, and continued control.

  • Flags only; never calls a transfer evasion
Memo writer

Drafts the analysis memo for the Sanctions Officer with a source for every sentence, the fields of the report of blocked property, the customer notice and requests for documents.

  • Nothing leaves the bank until a second person approves
Sanctions Officer

Blocks, rejects or clears with a reason. The agents propose; a named person decides.

Ask in plain words

Ask about any counterparty, owner or share

Ask about any counterparty, owner, share or rule, or ask for a draft. Every answer points to its source and opens the right screen.

Why is Varnholt blocked if it is on no list?

Because blocked persons own 52% of it, and OFAC treats a company owned 50% or more in aggregate by blocked persons as blocked itself. Gennady Orlek, listed on June 12, holds 28% directly. Halcyon Bay holds 24%; Orlek owns 60% of Halcyon Bay, so Halcyon Bay is blocked too and its whole stake counts.

What would change the answer?

Three facts. If Halcyon Bay were less than 50% Orlek's, its 24% would not count and the total would be 28%. If the registry's Orlek were a different man, it would be 0%; name, birth date and nationality all agree. If Orlek no longer held his 280 shares, Halcyon Bay alone would be 24%. Volden's control would not change the count either way.

Which other counterparties does Gennady Orlek touch?

On June 12 his listing touched 14 trees on file; 3 reached 50% and were blocked then. Varnholt was not on file: it arrived with today's payment.

Draft the report of blocked property

The draft is ready: $1,846,500.00 blocked on October 22, 2026 in account BLK-26-0091, beneficiary Varnholt Logistics FZE, owned 52% by Gennady Orlek through a direct stake and Halcyon Bay. It is due November 5, ten business days from the block. A Sanctions Officer who did not draft it approves it.

Every screen

The working solution, as it ships.

12 screens from the working solution, on its sample data. Pick one to see it large.

One bar to the 50% lineVarnholt Logistics FZE is on no sanctions list, but the stack adds what blocked persons own: Gennady Orlek's 28% directly and Halcyon Bay's 24%, counted whole because Orlek owns 60% of it. 52%, two points over the OFAC 50% rule line, with the agents' run beside it.
Ownership reviews, sorted by clock41 open reviews from payment holds, trade finance, correspondent banking, list updates and periodic reviews, each with its blocked share against the 50% line, stage, owner and clock, and a registry outage shown with what was rebuilt.
Control apart, and the ownership historyA listed manager, a possible proxy and a receivables clause, listed apart and never added. The history replays every transfer against the designation: 55% to 48% on paper, while the traced blocked share never fell below 50%.
The ownership treeNine nodes built from three registry extracts, every edge with its share and source, blocked persons and companies marked, and control drawn apart.
Three sources, side by sideThe registry, the customer's certification and the trade documents compared fact by fact: two conflicts and one gap shown, never averaged, and a request for documents drafted for a second person to approve.
Every number opens its sourceThe Halcyon Bay registry extract with the line that decides the case lit: Gennady Orlek, 600 of 1,000 shares.
The analyst preparesA cited, editable memo, five checks on the facts the answer hinges on, and the agents' proposal kept or changed with reason codes.
Separation of dutiesThe analyst who prepared the review cannot decide it; the prepared case waits for the Sanctions Officer.
The Sanctions Officer decidesBlock, reject, clear or return to the analyst, each with a reason code and a note for the record; a clear over the line needs the Head of Sanctions too.
After the blockFunds in a blocked account, blocked parties marked in trade finance, the OFAC blocked property report drafted with its due date, the customer notice for approval, and a confidential referral no customer-facing view shows.
When the lists changeAfter the October 21 list update, 6,214 ownership trees on file searched at every layer: 11 touched, 2 at 50% or more with reviews opened, 3 watched.
Audit trail and examiner packWho did what, when, why and on which evidence, people and agents alike, kept ten years, and a sealed export pack for an OCC examiner with passport and account numbers masked.
Governance

Sanctions ownership and control that stands up to an examination: cited, signed by two, on the record.

Every share cites its sourceEach part of the stack, each hinge fact, memo sentence and report field opens the passage it came from: the registry extract, the certification, the trade document or the list entry, kept with its retrieval record.
Two people on every decisionThe Sanctions Analyst prepares and the Sanctions Officer decides, never the same person. A clear in the 40–50% watch band, or with a listed person in control, needs the Head of Sanctions too.
Control is shown, never countedOfficers, signatories, proxies and receivable assignments are recorded apart from ownership. The agents never multiply through an unblocked company, never guess an unknown layer and never call a transfer evasion.
Nothing leaves without a second personThe report of blocked property, the customer notice and any request for documents are drafted by one person and approved by another. Additions to the internal blocked-entity list need the Head of Sanctions.
Need-to-know views, no tipping offRelationship managers and document examiners see payment status and outcomes only. A referral never appears on a customer-facing or relationship view, and exports mask passport and account numbers.
Ten years on the recordWho, what, when, why and the evidence, for every person and agent, kept ten years, with export packs for an OCC examiner, internal audit, the BSA officer and the Head of Sanctions. Agent versions and thresholds are pinned, and overrides carry reason codes.
Configuration

Your sanctions ownership and control policy, as settings

How blocked shares are added, what the restructuring watch flags, the clocks, who signs and which source wins. Every change is a change request the Head of Sanctions approves.

SettingDefaultChoose from
Blocked when owned50% or more, in aggregateSet by OFAC guidance; it cannot be raised
Indirect ownershipOFAC methodThe whole stake of a company blocked persons own 50% or more counts; never multiplied through one they don't
Watch band40%Reviews in the band are watched, and a clear needs the Head of Sanctions
ControlRecorded apart, never countedOfficers, signatories, proxies and receivable assignments
Restructuring look-back180 days after a designation, 30 beforeFlag drops to within 5 points under 50%, and transfers to family, former officers and companies under 90 days old
ClocksPayment held: 4 business hoursTrade finance 1 business day · correspondent 2 · designation ripple 2 · onboarding and periodic 5
ApprovalsTwo people on every decision, report and noticeThree for a clear in the watch band or with a listed person in control · Head of Sanctions on list changes
SourcesRegistry first; extracts no older than 30 daysCustomer certification valid 12 months · conflicts shown, never hidden
Connections

Works with the systems a sanctions review already runs on

Corporate registry data serviceregistry extracts and filing history for every layer
OFAC screening serviceSDN and non-SDN lists, with list update events
Document imagingcertifications, invoices and agreements, kept for the retention period
Payments hubholds, releases and moves payments to blocked accounts
Trade finance systemletters of credit, export bills and their document sets
Case managementconfidential referrals and OFAC reporting cases
What it changes

The difference, in numbers.

Every figure is labelled: a target the solution is built to, an estimate, a typical published result, or a proven one.

target
100%
of counted shares and memo sentences cite a registry line or document
Every part cited
click to see the passage
target
< 1hour
of analyst and officer time on a deep ownership review
By handhalf a day to a day
With agentsunder an hour
typical
10years
every review kept with its sources, history and both signatures

“demo” = seen in the working solution, on its sample data · “target” = the design goal, measured in the live solution · “estimated” = our estimate from the demo bank's design volumes, not a published figure · “typical” = published rules (OFAC, Revised Guidance on Entities Owned by Persons Whose Property and Interests in Property Are Blocked, August 13, 2014, and OFAC FAQs 398–402; 31 CFR 501.603, reports of blocked property within 10 business days; 31 CFR 501.601, sanctions records kept 10 years, as amended effective March 21, 2025; 31 CFR 1010.430, BSA records kept 5 years; OFAC advisory on sham transactions, March 31, 2026; FFIEC BSA/AML Examination Manual, Office of Foreign Assets Control). Corvane National Bank and the people, companies, accounts and references named on this page are fictional — characters and sample data in the working solution.

Questions

What sanctions teams ask us.

What is Sanctions Ownership and Control?

Sanctions Ownership and Control is software for bank sanctions teams that finds companies owned 50% or more by sanctioned persons, through every layer, even when the company is on no list. Seven agents build the ownership tree from registry extracts, read the customer's certification and trade documents, match every owner to the OFAC lists and add the blocked shares under OFAC's 50 Percent Rule. The answer is one bar against the 50% line, each part traced to its registry line, for a Sanctions Analyst to prepare and a Sanctions Officer to decide.

What is the OFAC 50 Percent Rule?

Under OFAC's guidance of August 13, 2014, a company owned 50% or more, directly or indirectly, individually or in aggregate, by one or more blocked persons is itself blocked, even when it is not on the SDN list. The solution applies the threshold as written: exactly 50% counts as blocked, and the shares of different blocked persons are added together. Settings can also apply the EU and UK ownership tests to euro and sterling payments.

How does it count indirect ownership?

OFAC's way: the whole stake of a company that blocked persons own 50% or more counts, and nothing is multiplied through a company they don't. In the sample case Gennady Orlek owns 60% of Halcyon Bay, so Halcyon Bay's whole 24% of Varnholt counts, not 60% of it; Orrin Tradeco's 3% does not, because its owner is not listed. Control, such as a listed manager, a possible proxy or an assignment of receivables, is listed apart and never added to the 50%.

How does it catch restructurings after a designation?

The Restructuring watch replays every dated transfer from 30 days before a designation to 180 days after, and shows the owner's shares on paper next to the traced blocked share. It flags drops to within 5 points under 50%, transfers to family, former officers and companies under 90 days old, and continued control, citing OFAC's advisory on sham transactions. It flags only; it never calls a transfer evasion.

What happens when the sanctions lists change?

A reverse search runs over every ownership tree on file, at every layer, and only trees whose blocked share moves reach a person. In the sample, the October 21 update added three names; the agents checked 6,214 trees, found 11 touched, opened reviews for the 2 that reached 50% on a 2-day clock, and put 3 on watch.

What happens after a payment is blocked?

The payments hub moves the funds to a blocked, interest-bearing account, and trade finance marks the blocked parties. The Memo writer drafts the report of blocked property, due to OFAC within 10 business days, and the customer notice, which names the regulation only; neither leaves the bank until a second person approves. A referral to financial intelligence stays confidential and never appears on a customer-facing or relationship view.

Do people stay in control of every decision?

Yes. Agents read, match, add and propose; they never decide, block, reject or release a payment, or send anything outside the bank. A Sanctions Analyst prepares and a Sanctions Officer decides, never the same person, and a clear in the watch band or with a listed person in control also needs the Head of Sanctions. Overrides need a reason code, and every step is kept with who, what, when, why and the evidence.

How does it go live?

The Agentic Solution Engine builds and deploys it from your requirements and documents: your sanctions procedures, approval matrix, clocks, reason codes and a sample of past ownership reviews, connected to your registry data, screening service, payments hub, trade finance and case management systems. It goes live once every quality gate has passed.

See it on
your counterparties.

We'll run Sanctions Ownership & Control on a sample of your own past ownership reviews.