Research Integrity Screening demo
Screens figures, statistics and citations for duplication and errors, for integrity officers 1:31
What the demo shows
Screens figures, statistics and citations for duplication and errors, for integrity officers
Seven agents screen a manuscript before it is submitted. An Image agent compares every panel with every other panel and with the lab's earlier papers for duplication, rotation, splices and generated textures; a Stats agent recomputes every p-value; a Citation agent checks every reference against retraction notices. Before any flag reaches a person, a Second-Look agent tries to explain it innocently from the legends, methods and raw files, and a Provenance agent finds the original image the author can swap in. A specialist decides each remaining item, a second specialist checks the private report, and only the Research Integrity Officer can turn a flag into an allegation.
Transcript
- Research Integrity Screening checks figures, statistics and citations for integrity officers, before submission.
- One biomedical paper in twenty-five carries a problematic duplicated figure.
- Agents compare fifty-nine panels with the lab's earlier papers, recompute statistics and check retractions.
- Panel 3C matches the lab's 2024 paper, rotated 180 degrees.
- A Second-Look agent explains two other matches, so nobody hears of them.
- Nothing explains 3C, but the original blot turns up in lab storage.
- Specialist Daniel Achterberg adds it to a private report, each item cited.
- A second specialist checks it before the author sees it.
- The author swaps in the original blot, and the re-screen comes back clear.
- Resolved before submission. Only the Integrity Officer can escalate, and it is all audited.
- This year, four in five flagged manuscripts were fixed before submission.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.