Research Integrity Screening demo

Screens figures, statistics and citations for duplication and errors, for integrity officers 1:31

What the demo shows

Screens figures, statistics and citations for duplication and errors, for integrity officers

Seven agents screen a manuscript before it is submitted. An Image agent compares every panel with every other panel and with the lab's earlier papers for duplication, rotation, splices and generated textures; a Stats agent recomputes every p-value; a Citation agent checks every reference against retraction notices. Before any flag reaches a person, a Second-Look agent tries to explain it innocently from the legends, methods and raw files, and a Provenance agent finds the original image the author can swap in. A specialist decides each remaining item, a second specialist checks the private report, and only the Research Integrity Officer can turn a flag into an allegation.

Transcript

  1. Research Integrity Screening checks figures, statistics and citations for integrity officers, before submission.
  2. One biomedical paper in twenty-five carries a problematic duplicated figure.
  3. Agents compare fifty-nine panels with the lab's earlier papers, recompute statistics and check retractions.
  4. Panel 3C matches the lab's 2024 paper, rotated 180 degrees.
  5. A Second-Look agent explains two other matches, so nobody hears of them.
  6. Nothing explains 3C, but the original blot turns up in lab storage.
  7. Specialist Daniel Achterberg adds it to a private report, each item cited.
  8. A second specialist checks it before the author sees it.
  9. The author swaps in the original blot, and the re-screen comes back clear.
  10. Resolved before submission. Only the Integrity Officer can escalate, and it is all audited.
  11. This year, four in five flagged manuscripts were fixed before submission.
  12. Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.

The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.