SystemPayment Disputes & Fraud Claims

Reg E Dispute Management

Reg E dispute management that keeps every claim on its legal clock, with a person approving every credit and letter

Every claim on its legal clock, provisional credit by day 3, every letter checked.

See one case, screen by screen ↓
targetDay 3of 10provisional credit decided, not day 9 or 10
target100%of member letters checked for every required element before a person signs
demo23claimslinked to one ATM by the Pattern agent overnight, $21,500.00 withdrawn, every one a magnetic-stripe read
demo2,512closurestested for timing in one month: every claim, not a sample
In short

What is Reg E Dispute Management?

Reg E dispute management is the work of resolving the errors a consumer reports on an electronic fund transfer, such as debit card purchases, ATM withdrawals, ACH debits, person-to-person payments and bill pay, within the deadlines and with the notices Regulation E sets. Reg E Dispute Management puts seven agents on the reading, records, arithmetic and drafting. A Dispute Specialist approves every credit, result and letter, and a manager checks each one as the second person.

AI use cases in banking: a buyer's guide to agentic AI for bank and credit union operations →

Updated

The problem

Why Reg E claims run late and letters fall short

Reg E dispute management runs on a legal clock that starts the moment a member tells the credit union about an error, on any channel. From that notice, Regulation E allows 10 business days to decide or give provisional credit and 45 or 90 days to finish, with written notices whose contents are set at each step. Yet the notice date is often taken from the dispute form, not the first call; the clock is picked by hand from processor codes; and the records sit in four systems: the core, the card processor, the ATM network switch and digital banking.

So provisional credit posts on day 9 or 10, or without the fees that came with the withdrawals. Denial letters go out without the right to request documents, and reversals without the five-business-day honoring notice. One skimmed ATM is worked as twenty separate claims, each waiting on the ATM owner's answer. Compliance samples closed claims after the fact, and the examiner finds the rest.

typical50million+U.S. disputes a year, each costing $10 to $50 to handle
typical$11billionin charges consumers disputed in 2024, up 40% since 2019
Where a claim's business days go before provisional creditestimated
By hand9 days
With the solution2 days
  • Logging the notice, picking the claim type and the clock1 → 0.2 d
  • Pulling records from the core, card processor, ATM switch and digital banking3 → 0.5 d
  • Waiting on one claim's answers while the same terminal sits behind others2 → 0.3 d
  • Member liability and the credit, with the fees charged1 → 0.2 d
  • Drafting the letter and checking its required elements1 → 0.3 d
  • Approval, the second person's check and posting to the core1 → 0.5 d

Estimated split of the business days from the notice to a provisional credit decision on a typical card or ATM claim, by hand and with the agents; our estimate, kept modest.

How it works

How a Reg E claim runs

Seven agents read, investigate, compute and draft every claim; a specialist decides and a manager checks.

What comes in
The member's notice and the records4 withdrawals · call, app form, ATM switch, card processor, sign-ins
Agents at work
Intake agentnotice date, the right clock
Then
Investigation agentrecords on the track
Pattern agentone ATM, 23 claims
Then
Liability agent$0, fees included
Clock agentescalates at day 7
Then
Letter agentevery notice drafted
Compliance check agentevery element checked
A person decides
Dispute Specialist and managerapprove, then check as the second person
What comes out
Provisional credit on day 3
Every letter complete
Tested, exportable record
One case, step by step

Reg E dispute management, one claim from first call to posted credit

Renata Holloway, a member of Norrell Federal Credit Union since 2011, calls on a Friday evening about four ATM withdrawals in Tampa she never made: $1,860.00, while her card was in her wallet in Dayton, Ohio. Here is claim RE-2026-18734, screen by screen, in the working solution.

  1. 01Day 3, morning

    What needs her today, in order

    Alana Pruitt · Dispute Specialist

    Alana's start page shows the 118 claims that are hers among 1,684 open, 47 due in 2 business days, 6 clocks at risk and 23 waiting for a second person. Overnight, from 1:00 to 2:34 a.m., the agents read 131 new contacts, recomputed 1,684 clocks, drafted and checked 96 letters and retried one core posting.

    “2:10 a.m. · Terminal TMP-4471 behind 23 claims, $21,500.00; 14 without provisional credit”

  2. 02The queue

    Every open claim with its clock

    Alana Pruitt · Dispute Specialist

    The queue sorts 1,684 open Reg E claims by days left, each with a ten-step clock bar and its next deadline: 812 before provisional credit, 803 credited and under investigation, 69 letters to check and 6 at risk. Claims escalate to the manager at business day 7 and to the Head of Card and Payment Services at day 9. Specialists filter by type of transfer, then assign, release and export in bulk.

  3. 03Friday, 5:52 p.m.

    The notice date is the first call, not the form

    Intake agent

    Renata called the Member Contact Center on Friday, October 16 at 5:52 p.m.; Jonah Whitfield blocked and reissued her card, and the call was logged as a card block. Her app form came on Saturday, which would have started the clock on Monday, October 19. The Intake agent reads every channel, finds the first contact that describes the error and sets the notice date there, citing the call transcript and Policy DSP-4 §2.1.

    “Starting there would have put day 10 on November 2 instead of October 30.”

  4. 04Day 3 of 10

    One claim laid along its legal clock

    Alana Pruitt · Dispute Specialist

    An ATM withdrawal on an account opened in 2011 gets 10 business days and 45 days, so the track runs from the notice to day 10 on Friday, October 30 and day 45 on Monday, November 30. Each agent's step sits on the day it happened, with its finding and source: the call and the app form on day 0, the ATM switch records on day 1, the Dayton chip read and app sign-ins on day 2, the pattern and the liability arithmetic on day 3. The next action is drafted directly under the track, with Approve and Edit.

  5. 05Days 1 and 2

    Four magnetic-stripe reads of a chip card

    Investigation agent

    The ATM network switch shows all four withdrawals at terminal TMP-4471, for $500.00, $500.00, $460.00 and $400.00, read the magnetic stripe with the chip not read, while the card processor shows her card chip-read in Dayton on October 14 at 5:31 p.m., between withdrawals 2 and 3, and digital banking shows her phone signing in from Dayton each day. The finding: consistent with a counterfeit copy of her card made from skimmed data, confidence 0.97. The network claim is ready to hand to Card Dispute Management with a 9-file evidence pack.

    “It proposes; Alana Pruitt decides.”

  6. 062:10 a.m.

    One ATM behind 23 claims

    Pattern agent

    Overnight, the Pattern agent found terminal TMP-4471 in 22 other open claims: $21,500.00 withdrawn across the 23, every one a magnetic-stripe read of a chip card. Fourteen have no provisional credit, four of them at business day 7 or 8, and 41 more cards were used there with no claim yet. It drafts the 14 credits, $11,788.50 with fees, as one item for the checker, and proposes card reissues to Card Fraud, a restricted referral to the BSA Officer and an alert to the ATM network, each for a person to decide.

  7. 072:14 to 2:18 a.m.

    $1,882.00 of credit, and a letter checked 7 of 7

    Liability agent and Letter agent

    Her card was never lost or stolen and no statement shows the withdrawals yet, so under §1005.6(b)(3) her liability is $0. The Liability agent also finds 4 ATM owner surcharges ($12.00) and 4 out-of-network fees ($10.00), so the credit is $1,882.00, not $1,860.00. The Letter agent drafts letter PC-3 v4 in plain words, and the Compliance check agent checks all 7 required elements, including the result by November 30, her right to request documents and no mention of any referral.

  8. 089:38 a.m.

    She approves on day 3, with a reason

    Alana Pruitt · Dispute Specialist

    Alana approves $1,882.00 to share draft account ending 4417 and letter PC-3 v4 on day 3 of 10, with the reason code “Investigation not complete; evidence supports the claim”. Her name, the reason and the evidence go on the audit trail.

    “Desmond Achterberg checks it as the second person before it posts. You cannot check your own work.”

  9. 099:41 a.m.

    The second person checks, and the core retries once

    Desmond Achterberg · Card and Payment Services Manager

    Desmond sees Alana's approval with its six cited sources and checks it. The core banking system does not answer within 30 seconds, so the posting is retried and goes through at 9:41:39 a.m., reference PC-26-1021-0441. Letter PC-3 v4 goes out, and the day 10 deadline is met on day 3. At 9:50 a.m. Alana submits the 14 pattern credits to him as one item.

  10. 10October 21

    What the member sees

    Renata Holloway · Member

    In the Norrell app, Renata sees $1,882.00 credited on October 21, including $22.00 in fees and usable now; her steps from October 16 to an answer by November 30; her letter; and a button to ask for the documents relied on. She never sees any fraud or BSA referral, other members' claims, agent confidence or notes, or a full account or card number.

Who it’s for

Built for everyone who touches a Reg E claim.

The same claim, seen by the four people who carry it: what their day looked like, and what it looks like now.

AP
Alana PruittDispute Specialist, Card and Payment Services · about 118 open claims
Dispute Specialist
Before
Re-keys each notice into the dispute tracker, picks the clock by hand and pulls records from four screens, claim by claim; the credit often goes out on day 8 or 9.
Now
Opens each claim already on its clock, with the records on the track and the credit and letter drafted; she approves, edits or returns it with a reason.
DA
Desmond AchterbergCard and Payment Services Manager · the second person on every credit and notice
Card and Payment Services Manager
Before
Checks credits, denials, reversals and notices against records he has to find himself, and owns the escalations.
Now
Checks each approval with its cited sources on one desk; a pattern's credits arrive as one item, and no one can check their own work.
IC
Ingrid CastellanoCompliance Officer · tests the work and approves rule and template changes
Compliance Officer
Before
Samples closed claims for timing and letter errors after the fact; the examiner finds the rest.
Now
Sees every closure tested for timing, 2,512 in September, signs the results and approves each change to rules, templates and agents.
JW
Jonah WhitfieldMember Services Representative · Member Contact Center
Member Services Representative
Before
Logs a call as a card block; the dispute starts later, when a form arrives.
Now
The call he logs is read by the Intake agent, and the notice date is set at that first contact.
Built on the engine

7 agents. Each with one job, and hard limits.

Seven agents read, investigate, compute and draft every claim; a specialist decides and a manager checks.

Intake agent

Reads chat, call transcripts, app forms and branch notes; fixes the notice date at the first contact that describes the error; classifies the transfer, tests coverage and picks the clock: 10 business days and 45 days, 20 and 90, or 10 and 90.

  • Never rejects a notice
  • Never asks for a police report or written confirmation first
  • Below 0.90 confidence, a person confirms the reading
Investigation agent

Pulls card processor authorizations, ATM network switch reads, ACH entries and authorizations, person-to-person payment records and digital banking sign-ins, and lays each finding on the claim's track with its source and a confidence.

  • Never decides an error
  • Never contacts a member or merchant
  • Below 0.90, a “no error” proposal needs every source opened by the specialist
Pattern agent

Compares open claims by terminal, merchant, originator, device and payee, finds common points of compromise and lists the cards at risk.

  • Never decides a claim
  • Card reissues and referrals are proposals for people to decide
Liability agent

Applies §1005.6 to the loss, notice and statement dates, and computes provisional credit with the fees charged with the transfers and dividends where the account earns them, showing the arithmetic.

  • Never withholds credit without the specialist's decision
Letter agent

Drafts every notice from approved templates in plain words: acknowledgement, provisional credit, result, no-error result, reversal and request for information.

  • Never sends a letter
  • Never mentions a fraud or BSA referral
Compliance check agent

Checks every letter's required elements and timing before a person sees it, and tests the timing of every closed claim each month.

  • Never passes a letter with a miss
  • Never closes a finding
Clock agent

Computes every claim's clocks on the credit union's business-day calendar and escalates at business day 7 and 9 of 10.

  • Never changes a deadline
Dispute Specialist and Card and Payment Services Manager

Approve and check. The agents propose; a named person decides.

Ask in plain words

Ask about any claim, clock or rule

Ask about any claim, clock, record, letter or rule, or say what to prepare. Every answer points to its source.

Why does Renata’s clock start on October 16, not October 19?

Because Renata told us on Friday, October 16 at 5:53 p.m., on a call logged as a card block. A notice can be oral, and Norrell counts a notice received while the contact center is open that day, from the first contact that describes the error. Her app form came on Saturday; starting there would have put day 10 on November 2 instead of October 30.

Is Renata liable for any of the $1,860?

No: $0. Her card was never lost or stolen; it was in her wallet, and no statement shows the withdrawals yet, so the 60-day rule cannot apply. The Liability agent also found $22.00 in fees charged with the withdrawals, so the drafted provisional credit is $1,882.00.

Which other members used terminal TMP-4471?

22 other members have open claims at TMP-4471, notices October 2 to 15, every withdrawal a magnetic-stripe read of a chip card. Eight already have provisional credit; 14 have none, four of them at business day 7 or 8. 41 more cards were used there with no claim yet. The 14 credits are drafted as one item for Desmond Achterberg, with a reissue proposal for the Card Fraud team.

What does Renata never see?

Any fraud or BSA referral, or that one exists; other members’ claims and the pattern; agent confidence and internal notes; and any full account or card number. The guard is locked by the Compliance Officer.

Every screen

The working solution, as it ships.

13 screens from the working solution, on its sample data. Pick one to see it large.

One Reg E claim laid along its legal clockClaim RE-2026-18734 as a track from the notice on Friday, October 16 at 5:52 p.m. to business day 10 (October 30: provisional credit or a result due) and day 45 (November 30: final result due), today marked at day 3. Each agent's step sits on the day it happened, and the next action is drafted underneath: $1,882.00 of provisional credit and the member letter, with Approve and Edit.
The dispute specialist's morningAlana Pruitt's start page: 1,684 open claims, 47 due in 2 business days, 6 clocks at risk, 23 waiting for a second person, and the agent brief on one Tampa ATM behind 23 claims.
Every open claim with its clockThe Reg E disputes queue sorted by days left, each claim with a ten-step clock bar and its next deadline, escalations at business day 7 and 9, and bulk assign, release and export.
The notice date fixed at the first callThe Intake agent's reading of Renata Holloway's notice: her Friday call, logged as a card block, starts the clock, not the Saturday app form. Each reading has its source and confidence.
The evidence, from four systems on one screenAll four withdrawals at terminal TMP-4471 read the magnetic stripe while her card was chip-read in Dayton and her phone signed in from Dayton each day: consistent with a counterfeit copy of her card, confidence 0.97. The agent does not decide.
One ATM behind 23 claimsTerminal TMP-4471 in 23 open claims, $21,500.00 withdrawn, 14 without provisional credit and 41 more cards used there with no claim yet. Each proposal is decided by a person.
The drafted credit and letter, in fullProvisional credit of $1,882.00 with the arithmetic: four withdrawals plus $12.00 in ATM owner surcharges and $10.00 in out-of-network fees, member liability $0 under §1005.6(b)(3). Beside it, letter PC-3 v4 with all 7 required elements checked.
The specialist approves on day 3Alana Pruitt approves the credit and letter on day 3 of 10 with a reason code; the dialog states that a second person checks it before it posts.
The manager checks, and the core retries onceDesmond Achterberg checks Alana Pruitt's approval with its six cited sources; the core banking system times out once and posts on retry at 9:41:39 a.m., and the letter goes out.
What the member seesRenata Holloway's status page in the app: $1,882.00 credited on October 21, her steps to an answer by November 30, her letter and a button to ask for the documents relied on. Beside it, what a member never sees.
Every closed claim tested for timingCompliance testing for September: all 2,512 closures tested for timing, 3 exceptions, and 60 letters sampled with 2 findings, each with its claim, rule and remediation, and Ingrid Castellano's sign-off.
Who did what, when, why and on which evidenceThe audit trail for people and agents, with filters by person, agent, claim and word, a CSV export and a sealed examiner pack for the NCUA, the CFPB or internal audit.
Agents with versions, thresholds and reason codesSettings for the seven agents: versions, models, confidence thresholds (0.90 for intake readings and for proposing no error, 0.95 for liability), who each hands to, and override reason codes.
Governance

Reg E dispute management that is cited, checked and on the record.

Every value cites its sourceEvery value and agent statement on a claim cites its record, passage or rule: the call transcript, the switch record, the fee on the core, §1005.11. One click opens the source.
A maker and a checker on every decisionProvisional credit, final results, reversals, every member notice, card reissues, routing a claim out of Reg E and every settings change need a second person. No one checks their own work.
Agents propose, people decideThe agents never decide an error, deny a claim, post money, send a letter, change a deadline, contact a member, reissue a card or file a SAR.
No tipping offA referral's existence never appears on a member view, letter or member-facing export. The guard is locked by the Compliance Officer, and referral notes are restricted to the BSA Officer.
Versioned agents with thresholdsEach agent has a version, a model and a confidence threshold. Overrides carry a reason code, the administrator proposes changes and the Compliance Officer approves them, and an evaluation set of 400 closed claims runs before any change.
Audit trail and examiner packsWho did what, when, why and on which evidence, for people and agents alike. Export a CSV or build a sealed examiner pack for the NCUA, the CFPB, internal audit or the BSA Officer, with account and card numbers to the last four.
Configuration

Your dispute policy, set once and versioned

The escalations, thresholds and guards every claim runs on are settings: the administrator proposes a change and the Compliance Officer approves it. The clocks the rule sets are locked.

SettingDefaultChoose from
Escalate to the manager at business day7Day 3 to day 10, one day at a time
Escalate to the Head of Card and Payment Services at business day9Day 3 to day 10, one day at a time
10 / 20 business days · 45 / 90 daysSet by §1005.11 · lockedNew accounts, point-of-sale and foreign-initiated transfers by the rule
Require written confirmation of an oral noticeOff (Policy DSP-4 §2.5)On, with members told at the oral notice · Off
A notice while the contact center is open counts that dayOn · open to 7 p.m. on business daysOn · Off
Intake agent confidence threshold0.900.70 to 0.99, in steps of 0.01
Investigation agent confidence to propose “no error”0.900.70 to 0.99, in steps of 0.01
Tipping-off guardOn · lockedReferrals never on a member view, letter or member export
Connections

Works with the systems a Reg E claim already runs on

Contact center recordingscalls, chats, app dispute forms and branch notes, read for the notice date
Core banking systemtransactions, account history, and provisional credit posted to the general ledger
Card processorauthorizations and how each card was read, chip or magnetic stripe
ATM network switchwithdrawal records by terminal, with the read method
ACH processing platformACH entries and originator authorizations
Digital banking platformsign-ins by device, and the app's dispute forms
What it changes

The difference, in numbers.

Every figure is labelled: a target the solution is built to, an estimate, a typical published result, or a proven one.

target
Day 7
every 10-, 45- and 90-day Reg E clock watched, and escalated to a manager at business day 7
Every clock watched
on the business-day calendar
target
100%
of member letters checked for every required element before a person signs
target
Day 3
provisional credit decided, not day 9 or 10
By handday 9 or 10
With agentsday 3

“demo” = seen in the working solution, on its sample data · “target” = the design goal, measured in the live solution · “estimated” = our estimate · “typical” = published figures (an industry estimate: more than 50 million U.S. disputes a year at $10 to $50 each to handle; ICBA: $11 billion in disputed charges in 2024, up 40% since 2019) · Rules: 12 CFR 1005.11 (error resolution: 10 business days, 45 and 90 days, notices), 1005.6 (liability) and 1005.13 (records). Norrell Federal Credit Union and the people, members, accounts, cards, terminals and claims named on this page are fictional — characters and sample data in the working solution.

Questions

What dispute teams ask us.

What is Reg E dispute management?

Reg E dispute management is the work of resolving the errors a consumer reports on an electronic fund transfer, such as debit card purchases, ATM withdrawals, ACH debits, person-to-person payments and bill pay, within the deadlines and with the notices Regulation E sets. Reg E Dispute Management puts seven agents on the reading, records, arithmetic and drafting. A Dispute Specialist approves every credit, result and letter, and a manager checks each one as the second person.

What is the Reg E disputes timeline?

From the notice of error, 10 business days to decide or give provisional credit, then 45 days to finish; 20 business days and 90 days for new accounts; and 90 days for point-of-sale debit card and foreign-initiated transfers. The member is told of a provisional credit within 2 business days and of the result within 3. The Clock agent computes every claim's clocks on the business-day calendar and escalates at business day 7 and 9.

When is provisional credit required under Reg E?

When the investigation will not be finished within 10 business days (20 for new accounts), the amount in error is provisionally credited by then, so the institution can take the longer period. The Liability agent computes the member's liability and the credit with the fees charged with the transfers: in the working solution, $1,882.00 instead of $1,860.00, drafted on day 3.

What must a Regulation E error resolution notice include?

A result letter gives a written explanation of the findings and the member's right to request the documents relied on; reversing a provisional credit needs notice of the date and amount and 5 business days of honoring checks and preauthorized transfers. The Letter agent drafts from your approved templates, and the Compliance check agent checks every required element before a person sees the letter. It never passes a letter with a miss.

Do Reg E disputes cover business accounts?

No. Regulation E covers consumer accounts. The Intake agent tests coverage on every notice and routes a business account's claim to the business dispute process with the reason, and routing a claim out of Reg E needs a second person.

How does it find skimming across claims?

The Pattern agent compares open claims by terminal, merchant, originator, device and payee. In the working solution it found one ATM behind 23 claims, every one a magnetic-stripe read of a chip card, and drafted the 14 missing credits as one item for the checker. Card reissues and referrals stay proposals for people to decide.

Do people stay in control of Reg E decisions?

Yes. The agents never decide an error, deny a claim, post money, send a letter, change a deadline or contact a member. A Dispute Specialist approves with a reason code, the Card and Payment Services Manager checks as the second person, and no one can check their own work.

How long does it take to go live?

The Agentic Solution Engine builds and deploys it from your requirements and documents: your dispute policy, letter templates and a sample of closed Reg E claims. It goes live once every quality gate has passed. We will walk you through it on your own claims first.

See it on
your Reg E claims.

We'll run Reg E Dispute Management on a sample of your own closed Reg E claims.