- Before
- Re-keys each notice into the dispute tracker, picks the clock by hand and pulls records from four screens, claim by claim; the credit often goes out on day 8 or 9.
- Now
- Opens each claim already on its clock, with the records on the track and the credit and letter drafted; she approves, edits or returns it with a reason.
Reg E dispute management, one claim from first call to posted credit
Renata Holloway, a member of Norrell Federal Credit Union since 2011, calls on a Friday evening about four ATM withdrawals in Tampa she never made: $1,860.00, while her card was in her wallet in Dayton, Ohio. Here is claim RE-2026-18734, screen by screen, in the working solution.
- 01Day 3, morning
What needs her today, in order
Alana Pruitt · Dispute SpecialistAlana's start page shows the 118 claims that are hers among 1,684 open, 47 due in 2 business days, 6 clocks at risk and 23 waiting for a second person. Overnight, from 1:00 to 2:34 a.m., the agents read 131 new contacts, recomputed 1,684 clocks, drafted and checked 96 letters and retried one core posting.
“2:10 a.m. · Terminal TMP-4471 behind 23 claims, $21,500.00; 14 without provisional credit”
- 02The queue
Every open claim with its clock
Alana Pruitt · Dispute SpecialistThe queue sorts 1,684 open Reg E claims by days left, each with a ten-step clock bar and its next deadline: 812 before provisional credit, 803 credited and under investigation, 69 letters to check and 6 at risk. Claims escalate to the manager at business day 7 and to the Head of Card and Payment Services at day 9. Specialists filter by type of transfer, then assign, release and export in bulk.
- 03Friday, 5:52 p.m.
The notice date is the first call, not the form
Intake agentRenata called the Member Contact Center on Friday, October 16 at 5:52 p.m.; Jonah Whitfield blocked and reissued her card, and the call was logged as a card block. Her app form came on Saturday, which would have started the clock on Monday, October 19. The Intake agent reads every channel, finds the first contact that describes the error and sets the notice date there, citing the call transcript and Policy DSP-4 §2.1.
“Starting there would have put day 10 on November 2 instead of October 30.”
- 04Day 3 of 10
One claim laid along its legal clock
Alana Pruitt · Dispute SpecialistAn ATM withdrawal on an account opened in 2011 gets 10 business days and 45 days, so the track runs from the notice to day 10 on Friday, October 30 and day 45 on Monday, November 30. Each agent's step sits on the day it happened, with its finding and source: the call and the app form on day 0, the ATM switch records on day 1, the Dayton chip read and app sign-ins on day 2, the pattern and the liability arithmetic on day 3. The next action is drafted directly under the track, with Approve and Edit.
- 05Days 1 and 2
Four magnetic-stripe reads of a chip card
Investigation agentThe ATM network switch shows all four withdrawals at terminal TMP-4471, for $500.00, $500.00, $460.00 and $400.00, read the magnetic stripe with the chip not read, while the card processor shows her card chip-read in Dayton on October 14 at 5:31 p.m., between withdrawals 2 and 3, and digital banking shows her phone signing in from Dayton each day. The finding: consistent with a counterfeit copy of her card made from skimmed data, confidence 0.97. The network claim is ready to hand to Card Dispute Management with a 9-file evidence pack.
“It proposes; Alana Pruitt decides.”
- 062:10 a.m.
One ATM behind 23 claims
Pattern agentOvernight, the Pattern agent found terminal TMP-4471 in 22 other open claims: $21,500.00 withdrawn across the 23, every one a magnetic-stripe read of a chip card. Fourteen have no provisional credit, four of them at business day 7 or 8, and 41 more cards were used there with no claim yet. It drafts the 14 credits, $11,788.50 with fees, as one item for the checker, and proposes card reissues to Card Fraud, a restricted referral to the BSA Officer and an alert to the ATM network, each for a person to decide.
- 072:14 to 2:18 a.m.
$1,882.00 of credit, and a letter checked 7 of 7
Liability agent and Letter agentHer card was never lost or stolen and no statement shows the withdrawals yet, so under §1005.6(b)(3) her liability is $0. The Liability agent also finds 4 ATM owner surcharges ($12.00) and 4 out-of-network fees ($10.00), so the credit is $1,882.00, not $1,860.00. The Letter agent drafts letter PC-3 v4 in plain words, and the Compliance check agent checks all 7 required elements, including the result by November 30, her right to request documents and no mention of any referral.
- 089:38 a.m.
She approves on day 3, with a reason
Alana Pruitt · Dispute SpecialistAlana approves $1,882.00 to share draft account ending 4417 and letter PC-3 v4 on day 3 of 10, with the reason code “Investigation not complete; evidence supports the claim”. Her name, the reason and the evidence go on the audit trail.
“Desmond Achterberg checks it as the second person before it posts. You cannot check your own work.”
- 099:41 a.m.
The second person checks, and the core retries once
Desmond Achterberg · Card and Payment Services ManagerDesmond sees Alana's approval with its six cited sources and checks it. The core banking system does not answer within 30 seconds, so the posting is retried and goes through at 9:41:39 a.m., reference PC-26-1021-0441. Letter PC-3 v4 goes out, and the day 10 deadline is met on day 3. At 9:50 a.m. Alana submits the 14 pattern credits to him as one item.
- 10October 21
What the member sees
Renata Holloway · MemberIn the Norrell app, Renata sees $1,882.00 credited on October 21, including $22.00 in fees and usable now; her steps from October 16 to an answer by November 30; her letter; and a button to ask for the documents relied on. She never sees any fraud or BSA referral, other members' claims, agent confidence or notes, or a full account or card number.