Treaty Submissions
Every renewal submission read and summarised, loss data rebuilt and gaps flagged in hours, not weeks.
Why it matters
At 1 January, 1 April and 1 July renewals, underwriters receive hundreds of submissions as PDFs and spreadsheets; analysts rebuild triangles by hand and many get a light look.
How the solution handles it
Agents read each submission, extract triangles, large losses and exposure profiles into clean tables, compare them with last year and flag gaps, then draft a cited summary. The treaty underwriter prices and writes the line.
How a submission moves
Five agents read the submission, rebuild loss and exposure data, compare years, flag gaps and draft the summary; a treaty underwriter prices and writes the line.
What it reads, and what it hands back.
What goes in
- Broker submission and slip
- Loss triangles and large-loss lists
- Limits and exposure profiles
- Cat model output and RDS
What comes out
- Underwriting summary, cited
- Clean loss and exposure data
- Year-on-year change list
- Broker question list
Who uses it
The difference, in numbers.
Every figure is labelled: a target the solution is built to, an estimate, a typical published result, or a proven one.
“Target” = design goal, measured in the live solution · “Estimated” = our estimate · by-hand time from an 8-hour working day · agents = the live solution’s configuration
5 specialist agents. One person decides.
More in this division.
Every facultative offer read against the underlying policy and guidelines, with a cited view in an hour.
Wording AbstractionEvery treaty wording turned into a cited abstract of limits and exclusions, checked against the slip.
Cession ReconciliationEvery bordereau and account matched to treaty terms, every difference explained before settlement.
Build this
for your team.
We’ll show Treaty Submissions running on your own documents.