Promotion and Tenure Dossier Review demo
Faculty affairs offices assemble P&T dossiers, evaluations and letters against unit criteria 1:31
What the demo shows
Faculty affairs offices assemble P&T dossiers, evaluations and letters against unit criteria
Seven agents read a closed dossier against the criteria in force for that candidate, chosen from the candidate's appointment date and election form and cited on every check. They test every external reviewer against the CV, two publication databases, the grants system and advising records; a separate checker recounts the qualifying letters against the college minimum. Confidential letters never reach the candidate, same-department committee members are recused, and student names in evaluation comments are redacted. A Faculty Affairs specialist prepares each change; the Director signs it; and the next step lights only when every blocking item is signed.
Transcript
- Promotion and Tenure Dossier Review checks each dossier against the unit's own criteria.
- Halden State's faculty affairs office reviews two hundred and ninety cases a year.
- Dr. Imani Okafor's case for full professor climbs six steps.
- Seven agents check her dossier against the criteria in force when she reached her rank.
- Each check cites the twenty nineteen guidelines and its page.
- External reviewer four co-authored two papers with her in twenty twenty-two.
- So letter four is out, and six qualifying letters still meet the minimum.
- Owen prepares both changes with reason codes. He cannot sign them.
- The Director reviews the evidence and signs.
- The College Committee step lights, due March sixth, with her department recused.
- Letters never reach her view, and every decision is on the audit trail.
- Two blocking gaps, closed in one morning, before any committee read the case.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.