Port Infrastructure Grant Applications demo
For port grants teams: three versions of one project priced side by side and challenged as a federal reviewer would, before the narrative is written. 1:24
What the demo shows
For port grants teams: three project scopes priced and challenged, then the application written
Agents build three scopes of the project from the engineer’s estimates, each with cost, federal ask, match and who pays it, benefit-cost ratio and readiness, and ask partners for match letters in fixed fields, conditions included. A challenger scores the work as a federal reviewer would and catches the agents’ own errors, such as the same truck trips counted twice or a jobs claim larger than the study supports. The grants manager chooses the scope with a reason and the application draft fills from it, every sentence cited. The CFO signs the match only when the letters back it, and the executive director co-signs.
Transcript
- Port Infrastructure Grant Applications helps ports win federal grants: four hundred eighty-eight million in 2026.
- Seven agents price three versions of Berth 4.
- Mid-run, Alma asks: are we a small port? The plan grows.
- A challenger reads it as a federal reviewer would, and catches the agents' own error: trucks counted twice. Rail drops from one point nine to one point six.
- Alma rules on the railroad's condition and chooses the rail scope; the outline fills from it.
- The CFO opens the plan: the state's three million has no letter, so he sends it back.
- That afternoon the state answers in fixed fields: three million, no conditions.
- He signs the port's share with a one and a half million backstop, inside the capital plan.
- One scope, chosen at one point six.
- Nobody signs what the letters don't back, and every step is audited.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.