botminds.aiRequest a demo
WorkflowPipelines, Midstream & LNG

Right-of-Way Encroachment Management

Right of way encroachment management that places each applicant’s drawing on the line, drafts cited conditions, and leaves the load and the signature to people.

See the demoBook a demo
Follow one crane crossing from inbox to signed letter ↓
The problem

A right of way encroachment request whose form and drawing disagree

A contractor emails a form, a site plan and a crane sheet. Someone in the land team finds the alignment sheet, judges by eye where the plan falls on it, rings an engineer if the load looks heavy, and searches for the letter written last time at that spot.

When the form names one crossing and the drawing shows another, that can go unnoticed until the crane is on site. Meanwhile the written answer is still owed inside a working-day clock, and the reason behind each condition leaves with the person who wrote it.

Built forRight-of-way analystsLand leadsPipeline engineersField locatorsInternal auditors

The Problem Today

Each request to dig or cross means finding the sheet, scaling a drawing and hunting old letters by hand.

10
working days to answer, in one regulator’s rules, for example published

Gathered by hand for each request

  • Emails
  • Drawings
  • Surveys
  • Old letters
  • The form and the plan differA haul road can sit well away from where the form says
  • Old answers decide new onesA letter from years ago decides what happens today

The Solution

  1. Read every requestEmails, forms and sheets read; what is missing is asked in writing
  2. Lay the drawing on the lineScaled onto the alignment sheet by matching points on both
  3. Propose cited conditionsTaken from similar past consents, each one linked to its source
  4. Route the decisionLoads go to the engineer; the land lead signs the written reply

Built-in controls

  • Cover and load questions reach the engineer
  • Load sums stay with the engineer
  • Land lead opens each part before signing

What You Get

Contractors get a clear written answer in time, and the next engineer can see why it was given.

  • Both clocks in viewReply and locate clocks counted in working days
  • Work with no consent flaggedField reports matched against consents and locate tickets
  • Each station keeps its historyLetters, checks and field notes stay with the spot
One crossing request

A 62-ton crane, Line 4, mile 41.6, and a form that names the wrong spot

A drainage contractor asks to walk a crawler crane across Line 4 at a farm crossing, to set culvert sections on the far side. The form names one station. The contractor’s own site plan puts the haul road somewhere else. Here is that request, on the working screens.

demoLine 4, the contractor, the landowner and each figure shown are sample data.

  1. 01Request in

    An email, a site plan and a crane sheet become one request

    Right-of-way analyst

    The request reader turns the contractor’s email and form into fields: Line 4 at mile 41.6, the existing farm crossing at Sta. 2196+48, the landowner, a crawler crane of 124,000 lb on 36 in tracks, the culvert work and the dates. Each field cites the line it came from. The request was complete, so the working-day clock started.

  2. 02Working day 7

    The haul road crosses 40 ft east of the station on the form

    Drawing placer

    Read their drawing lays the contractor’s site plan onto the alignment sheet. The scale bar says 1 in = 40 ft, but the plan was printed at 98.5%, so the true scale is 40.6 ft. Four control points give a fit of 1.6 ft. The road meets the line at Sta. 2196+88, and the agent stops there: the load is the pipeline engineer’s call.

  3. 03Working day 7

    Cover at the road is 3.2 ft, where the form’s crossing had 5.0

    Right-of-way analyst

    Clicking the red 3.2 opens the depth of cover survey it came from, page 14, station by station. The farm crossing at Sta. 2196+48 reads 5.0 ft because fill was placed there under an earlier consent. At the low point by the swale, the reading is 3.2 ft. The analyst now knows which ground the crane will really cross.

  4. 04Working day 7

    Seven conditions, each copied from a consent the company already signed

    Right-of-way analyst

    Seven conditions come from 2 past consents out of 23,640 searched: timber mats, hand digging first, an inspector on site, no machine digging within 25 ft, how the crane crosses, keeping the right of way clear, and putting it back. Each names its source and how sure the agent is, marked as sample. Two wait for the analyst to decide.

  5. 05Working day 7

    Hand digging first, read in the old letter it was taken from

    Right-of-way analyst

    A cite opens the earlier consent with the borrowed words highlighted: expose the pipe by hand and measure cover, the inspector checks pipe and coating, backfill in 6 in lifts, signed off before any mat goes down. Beside it, the panel answers the first thing a land person asks, why not use the fill, citing the contractor’s reply.

  6. 06Working day 7

    The engineer sees no sums until all four input pages are open

    Pipeline engineer

    The analyst accepts the two open conditions and sends the request on. At the top of the engineer’s list sits the question that came with it: is 3.2 feet enough. The worksheet shows four inputs, the crane sheet, the cover at the road, the pipe record and the ground, and the sums stay hidden until each page has been opened.

  7. 07Working day 7

    Without mats the ground takes 1,292 psf, and with them 689

    Pipeline engineer

    With the four pages open, the sums appear: 1,292 psf on the ground without mats against a sample soil value of 1,000, and 689 psf on two layers of oak. Hoop plus bending reads 61.1% and 58.7% of yield against a 90% sample limit. So the mats are for the ground, and a box spells out what these sums leave out.

  8. 08Working day 7

    Sign refuses until the land lead reads the engineer’s exact words

    Land lead

    The engineer marks the load accepted with conditions and answers the question: only with mats. On the reply, the land lead’s first press of Sign is refused, because that answer is unread. It opens as typed, marked not compared, with two choices: keep the request stopped, or record that it does not stop this crossing.

  9. 09Working day 7

    The letter names the real station and stops the job below 3.0 ft

    Land lead

    After opening the drawing, the conditions and the check, the land lead reads the letter as the contractor will. It says the plan puts the road 40 ft east of the form, where cover is 3.2 ft. Eight conditions follow, the last one new: if the hand dig finds under 3.0 ft, stop and call the pipeline engineer.

  10. 10Signed

    Signed and sent on working day 7 of 10, with the check beside it

    Land lead

    With all four parts opened, the letter goes out signed. The engineer’s note travels inside it, the sums stay on the record beside it, and the consent carries an end date. The request leaves the open list, which falls from 74 to 73, and the record for that station gains the load check and the consent.

Two layers of oak mats bring the ground under its sample soil value

The pipeline engineer’s worksheet for the crane at 3.2 ft of cover, on a sample method each company replaces with its own.

CheckNo matsWith matsLimit
Ground pressure1,292 psf689 psf1,000 psf, sample soil value
Pressure on top of the pipe7.0 psi5.6 psiCarried to the next line
Bending in the pipe wall5,203 psi4,187 psiCarried to the next line
Hoop stress at full pressure20,480 psi20,480 psiClass 2 design factor 60%
Hoop plus bending61.1%58.7%90% of yield, a sample limit

demoSample data, from the working solution. The pipe wall is inside the limit either way. The engineer sets each limit, and no agent runs these sums.

Around the request

Depth of cover, locate tickets and the record kept at each station

The locator’s, auditor’s and administrator’s view of Line 4, at full size on a click.

Their plan beside our sheetThe contractor’s site plan beside the alignment sheet, four control points and how far each is off. With too few points or a loose fit, the agent asks.
Cover at the low ground, over time4.0 ft when the pipe was laid, then 3.6 ft and 3.2 ft in two surveys. The screen shows what the record holds and leaves the judgment to the engineer.
The engineer’s answer, and what it doesThe engineer writes the answer and chooses whether it stops the work. Either way, the land lead reads those exact words before signing.
The record at one stationEach entry at Sta. 2196+88 since the pipe went in, each citing its page, with the site steps in order and how long each kind of record is kept.
Locate tickets on their own clockThe locator’s district, 13 tickets to mark in working days. A ticket with no request on file says so: a mark shows where the line is, not consent.
Audit trailPeople and agents in time order, 23 entries, none of them editable. The signature, the answer, the load check and each accepted condition all open what they refer to.
Settings, each with a signerClocks and thresholds, each signed by a named role. A change applies to new requests only, so an open request keeps the rule it came in under.

demoSample data, from the working solution.

Who proposes, who checks the load and who signs the consent letter

The one who proposes never signs, and the engineer never signs what he checked.

Right-of-way analyst
Sees
The drawing placed on the line, and each condition with its source
Signs
Decides each condition and sends the request on, with no signature
Pipeline engineer
Sees
The four input pages first, then the sums
Signs
Accepts, asks for more or refuses the load, in his own words
Land lead
Sees
The drawing, the conditions, the check and the letter, each opened
Signs
Signs, sends back or refuses the reply
Field locator
Sees
Tickets on the locate clock, each with its consent status
Signs
Marks tickets and files field reports
Internal auditor
Sees
Each request, letter and audit line
Signs
Reads and exports, and every action is refused

What the agents hand to the engineer and the land lead

The agents read, place and propose. The engineer and the land lead decide.

No agent runs the load sumsThey sit on the engineer’s worksheet. The conditions drafter proposes mats from past letters and never calculates anything.
Safety questions get no figures backA question on cover or load goes to the named engineer, and it stops the signature until that person answers.
No scale is guessedWhen a drawing has too few points to place, the drawing placer drafts a written ask to the applicant instead.
A mark is not consentA locate mark shows where the line is. The chip on each ticket says whether a consent exists, was refused or is still missing.
No letter leaves unsignedThe reply writer rebuilds the letter from the conditions as they stand, and only the land lead can send it.

Five systems behind one crossing answer, each one read only

The agents read these. Nothing is written back to them.

Mail and web formsRequests, attachments and the applicant’s replies
Land systemPast consents and their conditions
Map systemAlignment sheets and stationing
Document managementCover surveys, pipe records and data sheets
Locate systemTickets and their working-day clocks

What land teams ask about right of way encroachment requests

What is right of way encroachment management?

Right of way encroachment management is how a pipeline company handles requests to cross, dig near or drive over its line. Here agents read each request, place the applicant’s drawing on the line and propose conditions from past consents. People make each call on the load and the consent.

What goes in a pipeline crossing request?

The line and where the applicant says it crosses, the landowner, the machine and its weight, the work, the dates and a drawing. Each field is cited to its source. A sketch with no scale gets a written ask, and the clock waits until the request is complete.

How is heavy equipment crossing a pipeline checked?

Machine weight and cover thresholds in your rules send the request to the pipeline engineer. The engineer opens each input page, then sees ground pressure with and without mats and the stress in the pipe wall. The engineer’s own words go into the letter.

What does the pipeline crossing agreement letter say?

It names where the work really crosses, lists each condition with the earlier letter it came from, carries the engineer’s note and what to do in an emergency, and ends on a date. The land lead signs only after opening the drawing, the conditions and the check.

Why does depth of cover decide so much?

Cover changes as ground is worked and washed away, so an old figure at a nearby spot can mislead. The screen shows each survey reading by station, and the engineer decides. The letter stops the job if the hand dig finds less cover than the check assumed.

Can an agent approve a crossing?

No. Agents propose. The analyst decides each condition, the engineer rules on the load, and the land lead signs, sends back or refuses. A safety question put to the assistant goes to the named person, with no figures back.

How does it keep the reply clock?

Each request shows its working day and due date, and the clock keeper never stops or extends a clock. The rule set is your company’s own, signed by a named role, and a change applies to new requests only.

Pipelines, Midstream & LNG

More for pipeline land and damage prevention teams

All 6 solutions →
Storage Tank Inspection Management

Next due dates reworked from the readings, with the sum shown.

1-min demoMAOP Reconfirmation

Every operating pressure traced to the page behind it.

1-min demoControl Room Management

Handovers read against what stood at that minute.

1-min demo

Bring a crossing request
you answered last month.

We place its drawing on your line and set its conditions beside the old letters they would have come from.

Book a demoBrowse solutions