Own the origin register and prepare each determination file
- The making laid out by station and country
- The reviewer's case before deciding
- Each answer priced in duty
Country of origin determination built from the plant's own router, costs and photos, argued first as a CBP reviewer would, and signed by counsel as a legal position before the first entry.
Follow one pump's origin from router to counsel ↓Sourcing moves final assembly to a new plant, and trade compliance often hears about it when the broker asks what origin to declare. The analyst lists component origins as suppliers state them and emails the contract plant for a description of its process. What comes back is a paragraph or a deck, without minutes, costs or photos.
The memo that follows rests on the plant's words. The reviewer's best argument, that the castings already had the pump's shape, is never written down. Marking origin and duty origin get mixed in one paragraph, a plant's passing sentence about moving a step goes unnoticed, and no signature says who took the legal position.
Built forTrade compliance managersOrigin analystsDirectors of global tradeCustoms counsel
Importers settle where a product is made from a supplier's description, and Section 301 duty on its full value can ride on that call.
Pieced from mail and lists
Built-in controls
The importer knows what the origin rests on, and what each answer costs, before the first entry.
The trade compliance manager prepares the file, the analyst works the plants, and counsel signs it. Here: a centrifugal pump whose final assembly moved to a contract plant in Mexico.
demoSample data on these screens: the importer, its plants, the people, the product and each amount. The CBP rulings they cite are real.
The manager prepares, counsel takes the legal position, the director signs second.
Own the origin register and prepare each determination file
Send evidence requests, run the marking check and own re-checks
Sign determinations and ruling requests as legal positions
Add the second signature to ruling requests and release held lots
What a plant paragraph would have hidden, and where each went.
The reviewer's first question: is Mexico only finishing them? It went to counsel with 126 machining minutes and 4.1 kg removed on the record.
The motor from Vietnam is 25.1% of the price, the castings from China 16.7%. A close legal question, routed to counsel.
The plant's first reply did not say. A follow-up in fields came back: its own staff, cell A, two assemblers.
Said only in the plant's free-text note. A person read it, and the ruling request states it as a known planned change.
demoSample data, from the working solution.
Where the case started, how the plant answered, and what counsel saw before signing.
demoSample data, from the working solution.
Each hands its step to the next by name, and none states the origin as settled.
Builds the stations from the parts list, purchase orders and invoices.
Writes the plant and foundry requests as fields, then reads only the answers given in them.
Works out minutes, cost and value added per station and ties the cost build-up to the price.
Marks where name, character or use could change and quotes rulings for and against.
Reads the file as a CBP reviewer would and argues each station is minor processing.
Answers each question from the records or hands it to a named person, and drafts the determination and the ruling request.
Prices the duty of each possible origin, assumptions open to change, with statutory figures set aside for counsel.
A country of origin determination is the importer's documented answer to where a product is made for customs purposes. For goods processed in more than one country, CBP looks to where the article last became a new and different article with a distinctive name, character or use. Here the answer is built from the plant's records, argued by a challenger, and signed by counsel.
It asks whether processing in a country turned the inputs into a new article with a different name, character or use. Simple assembly or finishing usually does not; complex work such as machining, balancing and testing may. CBP rulings go both ways on similar pumps, which is why the file shows both.
No. For goods processed in Mexico or Canada, the marking rules decide marking only, while substantial transformation decides origin for Section 301 duty. Trade-agreement origin is a third question. The file keeps them apart.
The plant's router with minutes and machines, the cost build-up, drawings before and after, photos of the operations and the component declarations. Here each one is asked in fixed fields and kept with the file for the retention period.
Often, when the call is close and the duty at stake is large. Counsel signs the request and a second person signs before it goes in, and it describes how entries are made until CBP rules.
No. They gather, measure, argue and price. The manager prepares the file, counsel signs the origin as a legal position, and the director signs any ruling request second.
Every affected entry found and priced, with counsel deciding before CBP asks.
1-min demoUFLPA ComplianceEvery rung of the chain on its records, every kilogram accounted for.
1-min demoFree Trade Agreement QualificationKnow which products still qualify before anyone signs, every input tied to its record.
1-min demoWe will lay out its stations with you from the plant's own records.