WorkflowTrade Compliance

Free Trade Agreement Qualification

Free trade agreement qualification that re-weighs a product whenever its sourcing changes: each input tied to its certificate, regional value content worked both ways, and the math challenged before the certifier signs.

See one pump re-weighed and signed off for next year ↓
Watch with transcript →
The problem

A casing moves to a foundry abroad, and last year's certification still stands

A customer in Mexico asks for next year's blanket certification on a pump already covered by this year's certification. In the meantime sourcing moved the casing offshore, a fabricator says the baseplate will come from India from January, and the coupling guard's supplier certificate ends on the last day of this year. None of that reached the analyst, because nothing ties a sourcing change to the products that use the part.

So the bill of materials is exported again, the tariff shift tested input by input, and the cost roll-up rebuilt in a spreadsheet where export crating can sit inside net cost without anyone noticing. The manager signs with no view of the record behind each input. If the importing country verifies and the pump did not qualify, the customer pays the duty and the exporter owes written notice to everyone it gave the certification to.

Built forDirectors of global tradeTrade compliance analystsCost accountantsTrade compliance managers

The Problem Today

A sourcing change can push a product below its rule of origin, and nobody weighs it again before the certification is signed.

~80%
of US imports from Mexico and Canada under USMCA, July 2025 published
12
months: the longest period a blanket certification can cover published

Rebuilt by hand each year

  • BOM exports
  • Affidavits
  • Cost sheets
  • Emails
  • Certificates lapse mid-periodEnd dates sit on a list while the blanket year turns
  • Packing counted in net costExport crating inflates the figure the rule is tested on

The Solution

  1. The rule quoted, input by inputThe product-specific rule is read in full and tested on each input's heading
  2. Inputs weighed into two pansOriginating on a certificate, or non-originating, with the reason shown
  3. Suppliers answer in fieldsA lapsing certificate stays non-originating until a new one arrives
  4. Three people sign in turnPreparer, certifier and second person, after a challenger checks the math

Built-in controls

  • The analyst chooses the RVC method, never an agent
  • Supplier notes block the certifier until a person reads
  • The cost accountant alone confirms net cost

What You Get

Sourcing sees how close each product sits to its threshold, and the certifier signs with the record behind every input open.

  • Products that stop qualifying, foundRe-weighed when a shared part changes supplier
  • Supplier switches tested firstBoth methods, headroom and price floor, redone on each change
  • Past calls turned into rulesEach one in force after the director approves
Features

Free trade agreement qualification features, from BOM to signed certification

For the analyst who weighs the product, the cost accountant who owns net cost, and the manager and director who sign.

demoSample data throughout: the exporter, its customer and suppliers, the people, the parts and the costs.

  1. 01Origin balance

    Rules of origin determination for each bill-of-materials input

    • The product-specific rule quoted in full. The analyst sees which branch of the rule carries the product, so the tariff shift test is settled before any sum is built.
    • Each input placed by its record. Originating inputs sit on their certificates and non-originating ones show their heading, so the certifier can open any one of them.
    • Missing certificates counted against the result. While a supplier's certificate is still out, its input counts non-originating and the banner says which method holds meanwhile.
  2. 02Verifier

    A USMCA origin verification rehearsed before the certification is signed

    • Questions the importing customs authority would ask. Rule, net cost, transaction value, affiliate pricing and certificate cover are tested while the certification can still change.
    • Mistakes in the agents' arithmetic caught. Export crating left inside net cost is flagged with the general note's definition beside it, before anyone signs on the inflated figure.
    • Source shown beside each point. Each answer sits beside the cost roll-up and the definition it rests on, so the analyst checks it in place.
  3. 03Supplier certificates

    Supplier solicitation for certificates of origin, tracked by blanket period

    • Cover checked against the whole blanket period. A certificate ending partway through the blanket period counts for nothing, so no input rides as originating on lapsed cover.
    • Requests in fixed fields with reminders. Part, origin, criterion, period and producer come back comparable, and reminders go out against the due date.
    • Producer changes read from the answer. A supplier reporting a new country of origin moves the input to the non-originating pan from the date it gives.
  4. 04Supplier note

    Supplier free text read by the analyst before the certifier can sign

    • Free text stays outside the balance. Origin moves only through the supplier's fields, so a plan mentioned in passing cannot change the balance by itself.
    • Certifier held until the note is read. A production move hinted in a note is seen before signing, while the certification can still account for it.
    • Follow-up request created from the note. The analyst asks for a revised certificate when production moves, with a check-in date, so the blanket year stays covered.
  5. 05Net cost

    Regional value content calculation on a net cost the cost accountant confirms

    • Total cost to net cost, line by line. Sales promotion and packing for shipment come out where the definition says, so the net cost method is tested on the right base.
    • The agents' draft shown struck through. The cost accountant sees what changed and why before confirming, so a corrected figure is never quietly swapped in.
    • Transaction value terms beside it. Price, delivery terms and related-party status sit next to the cost, so the transaction value rests on checked terms.
  6. 06Method

    Transaction value or net cost method, chosen by the analyst on the record

    • Both methods shown against their thresholds. The analyst sees which method holds and by how much, and a failing method cannot be proposed.
    • Method chosen by a person. The rule leaves the choice to the exporter or producer, so the agents compute both and the analyst decides.
    • Reason and signature meaning recorded. The preparer writes why in plain words, ready for a verification years later.
  7. 07Certification

    USMCA blanket certification signed by preparer, certifier and second person

    • Three different people, each in their own view. No one signs work they prepared, and the certifier is held until the balance and the cost roll-up are opened.
    • Checks listed before anyone signs. Inputs weighed, verifier points closed, net cost confirmed and notes read are ticked off in one place.
    • Any change sends it back to all three. Editing a signed certification clears every signature; a sent one is withdrawn or replaced only with a second person and written notice.
  8. 08Certification of origin

    USMCA certification of origin with the nine minimum data elements

    • All nine minimum data elements filled. Every element the rule asks for, from certifier to the signed statement, goes out complete.
    • Delivered to the customer's portal. The importer downloads the signed certification instead of waiting on an emailed PDF.
    • Records kept for verification. The records behind each element stay with the case, so a verification years later is answered from the same file.
  9. 09What-if

    What-if on a supplier switch before sourcing moves a part

    • Supplier or price changed on screen. Sourcing sees whether a cheaper part stops the product qualifying before the purchase order goes out.
    • Headroom and price floor redone. The dollars left before the threshold and the lowest price that still qualifies update with each change.
    • The customer's duty at stake, labeled as assumed. The duty the buyer would pay is shown on a rate the analyst confirms, so the figure is read as a what-if.

Four people own a certification, and a fifth is told before parts move

Sourcing reads the headroom; it signs nothing.

Trade compliance analysts

Weigh each product, chase supplier certificates and propose the method

  • Every input tied to its certificate or heading
  • Both methods worked with headroom
  • Products re-weighed when a shared part moves
Trade compliance managers

Sign each certification as certifier and decide notices when a product stops qualifying

  • The record behind each input before signing
  • Supplier notes in front of them before signing
  • A product list sorted by qualification route
Directors of global trade

Countersign as second person and approve each rule the agents learn

  • The signed certification opened in full
  • Agent rules that change only with their sign-off
  • Origin verifications with their deadlines
Cost accountants

Confirm the net cost each regional value content test relies on

  • The build-up line by line
  • The agents' draft beside the correction
  • No figure confirmed by anyone else

Crating in net cost, a lapsing certificate, a baseplate moving to India

What the agents and the verifier found on one pump before the certification went out.

Export crating inside net cost

The draft left $38.00 of crating, palletizing and loading in, showing net cost at 50.32%. Corrected, it is 49.44%, below the 50% threshold.

A certificate that ends with the year

The coupling guard's certificate ended with this year, so it counted non-originating until the supplier answered with cover for next year.

A baseplate changing country in January

The fabricator answered in fields that the baseplate is made in India from early January, so it moved to the non-originating pan.

An impeller bought from an affiliate

The verifier asked what value was used; the answer is the declared import value, freight included, from the entry.

demoSample data, from the working solution.

Eight agents read the BOM, the rule and the costs, and none picks the method

Each step names its source and the next agent in line.

Request reader

Reads the customer's email for product, period, importer and date needed, and opens the case.

  • Promises no date to a customer
BOM reader

Pulls the bill of materials from the ERP with part, supplier, cost and HS subheading per input.

  • Changes no classification; flags gaps to the analyst
Rule reader

Finds the product-specific rule in the general note, quotes it and tests the tariff shift per input.

  • Paraphrases no rule without its quote
Certificate keeper

Matches each originating input to a certificate covering the whole period and sends fixed-field requests.

  • Counts no uncovered input as originating
  • Leaves supplier notes to a person
Cost builder

Builds total cost and net cost from cost accounting, and takes transaction value from the price and terms.

  • Confirms nothing it built; the cost accountant does
Origin balance

Weighs the inputs, computes regional value content both ways, the headroom and the price floor.

  • Picks no method; the analyst proposes
Certification drafter

Fills the nine minimum data elements of the certification.

  • Signs nothing and sends nothing without three signatures
Origin verifier

Plays the importing country's customs authority in a verification and lists what it would ask.

  • Gives no legal view
  • Calls no supplier dishonest

Requests from Mexico and Canada, the product list and the rules kept

The analyst's queue and the files a verification draws on.

Customer requests with their clocksTwenty-three open requests from customers in Mexico and Canada, each with its period, due date, owner and status, and a bulk re-weigh.
Guard supplier's portal replyThe guard supplier picks part, origin, criterion and producer, enters next year's period, attaches its certificate and adds a note a person must read.
Each product by its route340 products by qualification route; after the steer, one pump fails both methods on this year's shipments and waits for the manager's notice decision.
A verification letter, answered from the fileThe importing country's letter asks for the bill of materials, supplier certificates and cost records behind a past certification; the answer is assembled from that certification's file.
Origin rules learned from the team's own callsCertificate cover and distributor affidavits are in force; the rule taking packing out of net cost is with the director for approval.
From the supplier's reply to the second signatureThe supplier's reply, the note read, the cost confirmed and three signatures, each timed, reasoned and exportable as an evidence binder.

demoSample data, from the working solution.

Method, net cost and signature belong to three named jobs

No method pickedThe agents compute both methods; the analyst picks one and says why.
No net cost confirmed by the builderOnly the cost accountant confirms the figure the net cost method rests on.
No signature or sendPreparer, certifier and second person each sign separately before anything reaches the customer.
No notice decided by an agentWhen a product stops qualifying, the manager and a second person decide who is told in writing.
No legal viewThe verifier asks what customs would ask and names who decides.

What exporters ask about free trade agreement qualification

What is free trade agreement qualification?

Free trade agreement qualification is showing that a product meets its rule of origin, by tariff shift, regional value content or both, so a customer can claim preference. Here agents weigh each input on its record and draft the certification; the analyst, the certifier and a second person decide and sign.

What goes on a USMCA certification of origin?

There is no set form, only nine minimum data elements: certifier, exporter, producer, importer, description and HS subheading, origin criterion, blanket period, and an authorized signature and date with the certifying statement.

How is regional value content calculated?

By transaction value, the price less non-originating materials over the price, or by net cost, total cost less excluded costs such as packing for shipment, less non-originating materials, over net cost. The exporter or producer chooses the method; both are shown here.

What happens when a supplier certificate does not cover the whole blanket period?

The input counts as non-originating until the supplier answers with cover for the full period, and the balance shows the result both ways meanwhile.

What if a product stops qualifying after its certification went out?

The exporter must promptly notify in writing everyone it gave the certification to. The product list flags the product; the manager and a second person decide the notice.

Can sourcing see the effect of a supplier change before it happens?

Yes. The what-if screen redoes both methods, the headroom and the price floor for a switched supplier, and the analyst can send the result to sourcing.

Re-weigh a product
on last year's certification.

Bring its bill of materials, cost roll-up and supplier certificates, and see where it stands against its rule for next year.