Weigh each product, chase supplier certificates and propose the method
- Every input tied to its certificate or heading
- Both methods worked with headroom
- Products re-weighed when a shared part moves
Free trade agreement qualification that re-weighs a product whenever its sourcing changes: each input tied to its certificate, regional value content worked both ways, and the math challenged before the certifier signs.
See one pump re-weighed and signed off for next year ↓A customer in Mexico asks for next year's blanket certification on a pump already covered by this year's certification. In the meantime sourcing moved the casing offshore, a fabricator says the baseplate will come from India from January, and the coupling guard's supplier certificate ends on the last day of this year. None of that reached the analyst, because nothing ties a sourcing change to the products that use the part.
So the bill of materials is exported again, the tariff shift tested input by input, and the cost roll-up rebuilt in a spreadsheet where export crating can sit inside net cost without anyone noticing. The manager signs with no view of the record behind each input. If the importing country verifies and the pump did not qualify, the customer pays the duty and the exporter owes written notice to everyone it gave the certification to.
Built forDirectors of global tradeTrade compliance analystsCost accountantsTrade compliance managers
A sourcing change can push a product below its rule of origin, and nobody weighs it again before the certification is signed.
Rebuilt by hand each year
Built-in controls
Sourcing sees how close each product sits to its threshold, and the certifier signs with the record behind every input open.
For the analyst who weighs the product, the cost accountant who owns net cost, and the manager and director who sign.
demoSample data throughout: the exporter, its customer and suppliers, the people, the parts and the costs.
Sourcing reads the headroom; it signs nothing.
Weigh each product, chase supplier certificates and propose the method
Sign each certification as certifier and decide notices when a product stops qualifying
Countersign as second person and approve each rule the agents learn
Confirm the net cost each regional value content test relies on
What the agents and the verifier found on one pump before the certification went out.
The draft left $38.00 of crating, palletizing and loading in, showing net cost at 50.32%. Corrected, it is 49.44%, below the 50% threshold.
The coupling guard's certificate ended with this year, so it counted non-originating until the supplier answered with cover for next year.
The fabricator answered in fields that the baseplate is made in India from early January, so it moved to the non-originating pan.
The verifier asked what value was used; the answer is the declared import value, freight included, from the entry.
demoSample data, from the working solution.
Each step names its source and the next agent in line.
Reads the customer's email for product, period, importer and date needed, and opens the case.
Pulls the bill of materials from the ERP with part, supplier, cost and HS subheading per input.
Finds the product-specific rule in the general note, quotes it and tests the tariff shift per input.
Matches each originating input to a certificate covering the whole period and sends fixed-field requests.
Builds total cost and net cost from cost accounting, and takes transaction value from the price and terms.
Weighs the inputs, computes regional value content both ways, the headroom and the price floor.
Fills the nine minimum data elements of the certification.
Plays the importing country's customs authority in a verification and lists what it would ask.
The analyst's queue and the files a verification draws on.
demoSample data, from the working solution.
Free trade agreement qualification is showing that a product meets its rule of origin, by tariff shift, regional value content or both, so a customer can claim preference. Here agents weigh each input on its record and draft the certification; the analyst, the certifier and a second person decide and sign.
There is no set form, only nine minimum data elements: certifier, exporter, producer, importer, description and HS subheading, origin criterion, blanket period, and an authorized signature and date with the certifying statement.
By transaction value, the price less non-originating materials over the price, or by net cost, total cost less excluded costs such as packing for shipment, less non-originating materials, over net cost. The exporter or producer chooses the method; both are shown here.
The input counts as non-originating until the supplier answers with cover for the full period, and the balance shows the result both ways meanwhile.
The exporter must promptly notify in writing everyone it gave the certification to. The product list flags the product; the manager and a second person decide the notice.
Yes. The what-if screen redoes both methods, the headroom and the price floor for a switched supplier, and the analyst can send the result to sourcing.
Every zone lot closed like a bank statement, every difference explained or reported.
1-min demoTariff Impact AnalysisEvery tariff date set against the containers it meets, priced before they land.
1-min demoExport Control ClassificationClassify the order as built, not the catalog model, before anything ships.
1-min demoBring its bill of materials, cost roll-up and supplier certificates, and see where it stands against its rule for next year.