Collective Bargaining Agreement & Grievance Search demo
The plain answer first, then the clause's lineage: base article, side letter, MOU and award, checked for the date it happened 1:30
What the demo shows
Labor relations staff get cited answers from union contracts, side letters and rulings
Agents answer a manager's question in one plain sentence with the amount owed, then stack the clause's lineage: the base article, the side letter that controls, the MOU and the award, each dated, superseded wording struck through. A currency agent checks every layer was in force on the incident date, a cross-unit agent warns when another unit's contract answers differently, and a precedent agent pulls past grievances on the same article. When a grievance is filed, a drafting agent writes the Step 1 response against the contract clock; the manager signs, a Labor Relations Specialist approves and payroll releases any money. Bargaining notes stay with Labor Relations.
Transcript
- Collective Bargaining Agreement and Grievance Search answers managers' union contract questions.
- Arbitrators bill over two thousand dollars a day; Halden State has seven unions.
- A chemistry chair asks: a TA worked twenty-four hours in week nine. Do we owe?
- The answer comes first: yes, four hours, $125.60.
- Below it, the clause lineage: base article, side letter, MOU and award.
- The currency agent confirms each layer was in force.
- A past grievance settled it for three and a half hours.
- And the research staff contract answers it differently.
- A grievance is open; the agent drafts Step 1, due November second.
- The chair signs; a labor relations specialist approves.
- Bargaining notes stay private; every step lands in an arbitration pack.
- Ninety-two percent answered with a citation; every Step 1 on the clock.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.