Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) Reporting demo
District data teams build CRDC discipline, access and staffing counts from SIS, SPED and HR 1:35
What the demo shows
District data teams build CRDC discipline, access and staffing counts from SIS, SPED and HR
Five build agents, one per module, assemble about 1,800 figures per school from the district's systems. The Plausibility agent checks every figure against the last collection and the source logs and writes a plain note when one looks wrong; the Disparity agent works out risk ratios by group so leaders see what the public will see. Stewards fix the source systems, special education confirms every restraint and seclusion figure, the Director of Data and Assessment approves each module and the superintendent certifies.
Transcript
- Civil Rights Data Collection Reporting builds each school's figures from district systems.
- Auditors found most districts reported zero restraints, and doubted the data.
- Agents built 111,642 figures overnight. Here is Corrie Hill, as the public will see it.
- Zero restraints? The Plausibility agent finds fourteen reports the student system never coded.
- The cause: a response code nobody mapped in January.
- Special education confirms each one: fourteen, eleven with disabilities.
- The profile reads fourteen, with a submission note.
- Readers will see Black students 3.4 times as likely to be suspended.
- Agents never change a record; stewards fix their own systems.
- The data director approves each module; only the superintendent certifies.
- Every figure keeps its records for an OCR review.
- Twenty questionable figures, settled before anyone outside sees them.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.