A farm loan is secured by land, machinery, cattle and crops, and every one of them changes after the loan is made. The land's appraisal sits in the file for years while combines are traded, cattle are sold and prices swing. Collateral monitoring is the lender's regular check, between appraisals, that what secures each loan is still there, still covered by its liens, and still worth enough.
This guide is for everyone who stands behind a farm loan's collateral: ag loan officers, rural appraisal managers and review appraisers, collateral and loan servicing staff, credit administration and chief credit officers at Farm Credit associations, agricultural banks and credit unions, lenders on FSA guaranteed loans, and the leaders deciding whether to automate the work. No background needed.
Imagine you are the rural appraisal manager at an agricultural lender in Ames, Iowa, and your job this week is to say what every farm your lender holds a mortgage on is worth now. The third quarter's land sales and auction results came in on Monday, October 12, 2026.
One family, Brekke Valley Farms, grows corn and soybeans and feeds cattle in Hardin County, and owes your lender $9,348,600 on farmland loan RE-4471. Six tracts, 1,180 acres, secure it. The only value in the file is an appraisal from March 2023, 43 months old: $13,330,000. On that value the loan is 70.1% of what the land is worth, its loan-to-value.
One of those tracts, South Creek, is 320 acres of poorer creek-bottom ground, part of it without underground drainage. The 2023 appraiser valued it at $9,250 an acre on three sales from 2022. Since November 2025, four sales of similar soil within 12 miles, each between an unrelated buyer and seller, have closed at $7,640 to $8,310 an acre.
Appraisal in the file · March 2023
South Creek
320 acres · soil index 61
Sales used
Three, all from 2022
Value
$9,250 an acre
Six tracts
$13,330,000
Re-marked on recent sales · Q3 2026
South Creek
320 acres · soil index 61
Sales used
Four, November 2025 to July 2026
Value
$7,950 an acre
Six tracts
$12,403,000
70.1% loan-to-value in the file75.4% on today's salesyour policy's watch line for farmland loans is 75%.
The same quarter's auction results hold a second surprise. The 24-row planter listed on line 8 of the Brekkes' security agreement, valued at $164,000, sold at a farm auction in Eldora on August 22, 2026 for $148,500. Nobody asked your lender to release its lien, and none of the money reached the loan. The cattle check out: the herd is 110 head smaller than pledged, and the sale shows up as a $271,800 deposit three days later.
Monitoring catches the loan that crossed its line on a stale appraisal, and the pledged machine that left the farm, in the quarter they happen instead of at renewal or default.
How farm lenders keep track of the land, machinery, livestock and crops behind their loans
The four kinds of farm collateral, the liens and the federal buyer rule, appraisals and evaluations, the 2026 land, machinery and cattle markets, the common failures and how lenders do the work today, explained without selling anything. If you are new to farm lending, start here.
01 · In plain words
What happens to a farm loan's collateral after the loan closes
A farm lender takes a lien on something it could sell if the loan is not repaid. For a land loan that is a mortgage on the farm. For an operating line, the yearly credit a farm draws on for seed, feed and fuel, it is a security interest in the crops, cattle, machinery and often the crop insurance and government payments. At closing an appraiser values the land and the loan officer values the machinery and livestock, and the loan is sized so the collateral is worth comfortably more than the debt. That margin is the cushion.
Then the farm keeps working. Corn is harvested and sold. Feeder cattle arrive in the spring and go to a packer in the fall. A combine is traded for a newer one. A land market that rose for five years flattens, and poorer ground starts to sell for less than good ground. None of this is wrongdoing: farms are businesses, and their assets are meant to move. But each sale, trade and price change alters the cushion behind a loan, and the file does not change by itself.
Collateral monitoring is the work of keeping the file true. It has two halves. The first is value: re-pricing land, machinery and livestock against recent sales and market reports, recomputing each loan's loan-to-value, and ordering a new appraisal where the cushion has thinned. The second is existence and position: checking that pledged machines are still on the farm, that head counts match what was pledged, that sale proceeds reached the loan, and that the lender's liens and notices still protect it against buyers.
Regulators expect it. Bank examiners want lenders to "monitor collateral risk on a portfolio and on an individual credit basis".1 The Farm Service Agency, which guarantees farm loans made by private lenders, makes the lender responsible for "protecting and accounting for the collateral" and for ensuring the borrower "does not convert loan security".2 The hard part is scale: a lender with a thousand farm loans holds thousands of tracts, thousands of machines and tens of thousands of head, and the people who know how to value them are few.
How farm loan collateral ages after closing, in five steps
The loan closes on fresh valuesBrekke Valley Farms' land is appraised in March 2023 at $13,330,000; machinery and cattle are listed on a security agreement schedule.
Liens are perfected and notices sentA mortgage is recorded, a financing statement filed, the crop insurer and the cattle buyers notified.
The collateral is watched between appraisalsLand re-priced on recent sales, machinery matched to auction results, head counts checked against deposits. This is where South Creek's 14% fall and the sold planter are caught, or missed.
The line renews each yearA balance sheet, an inventory and an annual review; most lenders re-check chattel values here.
Trouble, if it comes, tests the fileIn a workout or a bankruptcy, the collateral is only worth what can be found and sold, with liens that hold.
Step 3 is the subject of this guide. The people, farms and figures in this example are fictional.
Four surprises about farm liens, land values and pledged property
A buyer of cattle can keep them free of your lien
Under the Food Security Act of 1985, a buyer of farm products in the ordinary course takes free of the farmer's lender's security interest "even though the security interest is perfected", unless the lender sent a proper notice or used a state's central filing system.3
A lien recorded elsewhere does not reach the crop insurance check
The federal crop policy says the insurer will not pay a lienholder "even if you may have a lien or other assignment recorded elsewhere" unless the farmer signed the insurer's own assignment form.4
In the same year, land values rose or stood still, depending on who measured
USDA put US farm real estate up 3.4% in 2026, while 79 Midwest lenders surveyed by the Chicago Fed saw no change over the year to mid-2026, a 3.7% fall after inflation.5,6
One in four borrowers visited had sold pledged property
When USDA's inspector general visited 71 borrowers with direct FSA farm loans, a quarter had removed collateral without permission, and the agency usually approved the sales after the fact.7
Loan-to-value, evaluation, farm products and conversion defined
Loan-to-value
The loan balance divided by the value of what secures it. $7.5 million owed on land worth $10 million is 75%.
Evaluation
A lender's documented estimate of collateral value, shorter than a full appraisal; allowed below the appraisal thresholds and for monitoring.
Farm products
Crops, livestock, supplies and their unprocessed products held by a farmer: the collateral the federal buyer rule covers.
Conversion
Selling, removing or using pledged property against the lender's rights, for example selling a pledged planter without a release.
Land, machinery, livestock and crops: four kinds of farm collateral on four different clocks
In shortFarm real estate is 83% of the value of all US farm assets, so land dominates every book. But the collateral behind an operating line is chattel, property that can be moved: machinery that wears out and trades, livestock that is born, sold and dies, and crops that exist only between planting and sale. Each kind loses value, and goes missing, in its own way, so each needs its own check.
Farm real estate is 83 of every 100 dollars of US farm assets
83 in 100
dollars of farm sector assets are farm real estate, 2026 forecast
dollars of farm sector assets are farm real estate, 2026 forecast
83 of 100
USDA's Economic Research Service forecasts farm sector debt at $605.1 billion for 2026, up 4.6%, of which $399.0 billion is secured by real estate and $206.1 billion is not. The debt-to-asset ratio is forecast at 13.54%, up from 13.34% in 2025.8 Low leverage on average hides a wide spread: a young operator with rented land and a new combine can be far more leveraged than the sector, and it is the operating lines, secured by chattel, that move fastest.
Price swings by class and weight, disease, weather
Sold, died, never existed; proceeds not applied
Weekly market reports by class and weight
Head counts, brands or tags, sale barn records, deposits
Crops and payments
Yield, price, quality, storage loss
Sold to a buyer the lender never notified; insurance paid to the farmer alone
Bushels on hand times cash price; insurance guarantee
Bin measurements, warehouse receipts, insurance assignment on file
Why the clocks matter. Land is appraised at origination and often not again for years. Machinery is valued at each line renewal. Livestock is counted when the borrower reports. Crops change hands within weeks. A file that holds four values taken at four different times is four different ages at once, and a lender that re-checks only at renewal sees each change up to a year late.
03 · The rules and their dates
Which federal and state rules reach farm collateral, and the three that moved in 2025 and 2026
Status as of October 2026
In shortNo single rule says how often to re-value farm collateral. A federal statute decides who wins when farm products are sold; the Uniform Commercial Code decides the rest; bank and Farm Credit rules set when an appraisal is needed and ask lenders to monitor in between; FSA's guarantee rules spell out inspections and age limits. Three things changed recently: new model risk guidance, the valuation-model rule taking effect for home mortgages, and the move of Oklahoma's central filing system.
The farm collateral rulebook was written in 1985 and 2010, and keeps changing at the edges
Dec 1985Food Security Act, section 1324
Buyers of farm products take free of the lender's lien unless notified directly or through a state central filing system.
Dec 2, 2010Interagency appraisal and evaluation guidelines
Banks monitor collateral risk by loan and by portfolio, with criteria for new valuations.
Oct 1, 2025Valuation-model rule takes effect
Quality controls for automated valuation in credit decisions on mortgages secured by a consumer's home.
Mar 16, 2026USDA approves Oklahoma's move
The central filing system passes to the Oklahoma County Clerk 180 days after approval, under a 2025 state law, with electronic filing and filings online within 48 hours.
Apr 17, 2026SR 26-2 replaces SR 11-7
New model risk guidance from the Fed, OCC and FDIC.
In forceFSA guarantee rules (2026 CFR)
Chattel appraisals no older than 12 months; real estate no older than 18 months above $250,000.
Buyers, commission merchants and selling firms take farm products free of the lender's lien unless notified by direct written notice within a year before the sale, or through a certified central filing system.3
In force; notices must be amended within 3 months of a material change
UCC Article 9 (state law)
Defines farm products and equipment; a security interest continues in collateral sold without the lender's authorization and attaches to identifiable proceeds; growing crops can outrank the landowner's mortgage.14
Enacted in every state, with local variations
12 CFR 614.4260–4266 (Farm Credit)
Market value for real and personal property; personal property evaluations must name "a source of comparisons of value" and describe quantity, species, weight, condition and date.9
Current
12 CFR 34.43 and the 2010 guidelines (banks)
Appraisal above $500,000 for farm real estate; an evaluation below it; criteria for when a value is stale; portfolio monitoring with external market data.15,1
Current
7 CFR 762 (FSA guaranteed loans)
Inspect collateral "as often as deemed necessary", account for its whereabouts in the annual analysis of lines of credit and term loans over $100,000, apply sale proceeds by lien priority, file status reports March 31 and September 30.2
2026 edition
7 CFR 457.8 (crop insurance)
Indemnities go to a creditor only through the insurer's assignment form, one crop year at a time.4
2026 edition
18 U.S.C. 658
Concealing, removing or converting, with intent to defraud, property pledged to the Farm Credit lenders and USDA farm credit agencies the statute names (production credit associations among them) is a crime: up to five years, or one year at $1,000 or less.16
In force
SR 26-2 / OCC 2026-13 / FDIC FIL-15-2026
Model risk management tailored to the institution; "most relevant" to banking organizations over $30 billion.13
April 17, 2026
Farm Credit institutions are supervised by the Farm Credit Administration, which had published no rule on artificial intelligence in the Federal Register as of October 2026. The 2024 valuation-model rule covers automated valuations used in credit decisions on mortgages secured by a consumer's principal dwelling; it does not cover farm equipment, and models used only to monitor a loan portfolio fall outside it.10
04 · Liens and the buyer rule
Why a perfected lien on cattle or grain can lose to an honest buyer, and the two ways a lender keeps it
In shortSince 1985, a buyer of farm products from a farmer takes them free of the farmer's lender's lien, even a perfected one the buyer knows about. The lender keeps its claim only if it sent the buyer a proper written notice within the year before the sale, or, in one of the states with a certified central filing system, filed an effective financing statement the buyer should have checked. Machinery is outside this rule. Monitoring has to keep both the notices and the list of buyers current.
Congress wrote the rule because buyers were paying twice: once to the farmer, and again to the farmer's lender when the farmer did not pay the loan. Its findings describe a purchaser who "lacks any practical method for discovering the existence of the security interest". The fix in subsection (d) is blunt: a buyer in the ordinary course from a seller engaged in farming "shall take free of a security interest created by the seller, even though the security interest is perfected".3
Subsection (e) gives the lender two ways back. In a direct notice state, the buyer takes subject to the lien only if, within one year before the sale, it received a written notice organized by farm product that names the lender and the farmer, gives the farmer's taxpayer or other approved number, describes the products with the crop year and the counties, and states the payment terms for a release, typically a check payable jointly to the farmer and the lender. And then only if the buyer did not meet those terms.3
In a central filing state, the lender files an effective financing statement with the state, and buyers who fail to register with the state, or who registered and were sent the list naming that farmer and product, take subject to the lien unless they met its payment terms.3 The same rules cover commission merchants and selling firms such as livestock auction markets.3
Whether a buyer of pledged grain or cattle takes it free of your lien turns on four questions
1Is it a farm product?
Crops, livestock, supplies or their unprocessed products held by a farmer. Machinery is equipment, and the Uniform Commercial Code governs it.
Lender's counselFirst
2Where was it produced or located?
That state decides whether direct notice or central filing applies.
Collateral staffSecond
3Direct notice state
Did this buyer receive a proper written notice in the 12 months before the sale, amended within 3 months of any change?
Loan officerIf no central filing
4Central filing state
Is an effective financing statement on file, naming this farmer and this product, and is the buyer registered?
Collateral staffIf certified
5Did the buyer meet the payment terms?
A buyer that paid as the notice required, for example by joint check, takes free.
Crops, livestock, supplies or their unprocessed products held by a farmer. Machinery is equipment, and the Uniform Commercial Code governs it.
Lender's counsel
First
Where was it produced or located?
That state decides whether direct notice or central filing applies.
Collateral staff
Second
Direct notice state
Did this buyer receive a proper written notice in the 12 months before the sale, amended within 3 months of any change?
Loan officer
If no central filing
Central filing state
Is an effective financing statement on file, naming this farmer and this product, and is the buyer registered?
Collateral staff
If certified
Did the buyer meet the payment terms?
A buyer that paid as the notice required, for example by joint check, takes free.
Buyer
Last
Which states run a central filing system
USDA certifies central filing systems. Its last published count, in 2016, was 19 states.17
Central filing · 19 states (2016 count)
Buyers check the state's list
A legislative record names them: Alabama, Colorado, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia and Wyoming.18
Direct notice · every other state
The lender writes to each buyer
Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri and Texas among them. The lender keeps its own list of the buyers, auction markets and elevators each borrower sells to, and notifies each one.
Coverage differs from state to state: Oklahoma's system covers all farm products. In March 2026 USDA approved moving it from the Secretary of State to the Oklahoma County Clerk, with electronic filing and filings online within 48 hours;11 the state's 2025 law makes the move take effect 180 days after USDA's certification.12 Confirm the current list with USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service before relying on it.
A Nebraska law firm summarizes what a Nebraska filing must hold: the lender's and borrower's names and addresses, the borrower's Social Security or tax number, the products, each county where they are produced or located, and the crop year unless every crop is covered. A filing lasts five years and can be continued. Courts have split on names: a trade name on a filing was not "seriously misleading" where the buyer knew the borrower, while a nickname, or a corporate name missing "Inc.", sank a lender's UCC financing statement in bankruptcy.19
Each kind of farm collateral is protected by a different instrument, so one lien search never covers the book
How much each instrument protects the lender's position, by collateral
Our reading of the sources3,14,4,20 · Our reading of the statute, the UCC and the crop policy. Breeding stock is notified when it is culled and sold. State agricultural liens, such as a landlord's or a feed dealer's, can outrank all of these.
Show the numbers
Mortgage
UCC filing
Buyer notice or EFS
Insurance assignment
Farmland
Essential
None
None
None
Machinery
None
Essential
None
None
Stored grain
None
Essential
Essential
None
Growing crops
Some
Essential
Essential
Essential
Feeder cattle
None
Essential
Essential
None
Breeding stock
None
Essential
Some
None
Crop insurance proceeds
None
Some
None
Essential
Liens a lender does not create, and can lose to
States grant suppliers and landlords their own liens on crops and livestock. Iowa State's agricultural law center lists them for Iowa: a landlord's lien that can outrank an earlier security interest, a farm supply dealer's lien perfected within 31 days, a harvester's lien with priority "regardless of when that security interest was perfected", custom feedlot and production contract liens, and a veterinarian's lien.20
The federal buyer rule "applies only to security interests, not agricultural liens".20 A lender monitoring a feeder cattle line has to know whose cattle are in whose yard, and who has fed them.
Machinery follows other rules. A combine or planter is equipment. Under Article 9 a security interest generally continues in collateral that is sold, unless the lender authorized the sale free of its interest, and it attaches to the identifiable proceeds.14 A farmer selling a used planter is not usually in the business of selling planters, so the ordinary-course buyer protection rarely helps the buyer. That gives the lender rights, but rights against a machine in another county and a buyer who paid in good faith are slow to enforce. Finding the sale quickly matters more than winning the argument later. This is general information; ask your counsel about a particular sale.
05 · Appraisals and evaluations
When a farm needs a new appraisal, when an evaluation will do, and how old a value may be
In shortBanks need a certified appraisal for farm real estate loans above $500,000; Farm Credit lenders need a licensed or certified appraisal above $250,000 (certified above $1 million); below those lines a documented evaluation is enough. Both let an old value support a later loan action only if there has been "no obvious and material change in market conditions". FSA guarantees set hard ages: 12 months for chattel appraisals, 18 months for real estate above $250,000. Monitoring is how a lender knows whether the market has changed.
A Farm Credit lender needs an appraisal at half the loan size a bank does
Transaction value above which a certified or licensed appraisal is required for farm real estate
Bank, commercial real estate (farmland included)12 CFR 34.43$500K
Farm Credit System institution12 CFR 614.4260$250K
FSA guaranteed loan, certified general appraiser7 CFR 762.127$250K
For banks, farmland counts as commercial real estate, because the rule defines a commercial real estate transaction as any real estate-related transaction "not secured by a single 1-to-4 family residential property". Above $500,000 the appraisal must be by a state-certified appraiser; at $1,000,000 or more a certified appraiser is required whatever the property. Below the threshold, and for business loans of $1 million or less that do not depend on real estate for repayment, the bank must still obtain "an appropriate evaluation of real property collateral".15
Farm Credit's rule sets its threshold at $250,000, requires a state-certified appraiser above $1,000,000, and has its own business loan exemption at $1,000,000. Its real estate standard requires market value from the income, sales comparison or cost approaches, reconciled, with "nonagricultural influences" such as urban development or minerals identified.
Its personal property standard is unusually specific: an evaluation must include "a source of comparisons of value (i.e., equipment dealer listings, Blue Book, market sales reports, etc.)" and a description including "location of the property and, where applicable, quantity, species/variety, measure/weight, value per unit and in total, type of identification (such as brand, bill of lading, or warehouse receipt), quality, condition, and date".9 Where a fee appraiser did the evaluation, the institution's standards must include "periodic collateral inspections" by its own staff.9
When an old value goes stale
The exemption both rules share
No obvious and material change
A later loan action can rest on the existing value if there is no new money beyond closing costs, or if "there has been no obvious and material change in market conditions or physical aspects of the property that threatens the adequacy" of the collateral protection.15,9 A lender has to be watching to say that.
The guidelines' list
What makes a value stale
"Passage of time", "Volatility of the local market", "Changes in terms and availability of financing", "Natural disasters", over- or under-supply, improvements or "Lack of maintenance".1 The agencies reserve the right to require a new appraisal or evaluation on an existing loan when there are safety and soundness concerns.1
FSA guaranteed loans
Ages written into the rule
Chattel appraisal "not more than 12 months old", based on "public sales of the same or similar property in the market area". Real estate above $250,000: "not more than 18 months old" by a certified general appraiser, unless the lender documents stable markets, condition and value.2
Releases on FSA loans
The 75% test
Releasing security outright, with no payment, needs FSA's written approval and a guaranteed balance of at most 75% of the remaining security, "excluding the value of growing crops or planned production, based on a current appraisal".2
The guidelines also ask banks to keep criteria "for determining when to obtain a new appraisal or evaluation" that address "deterioration in the credit since origination or changes in market conditions", and to show they have "sufficient, reliable, and timely information on market trends", from "external market data, internal data, or reviews of recently obtained appraisals and evaluations".1 That is a description of collateral monitoring.
06 · Re-marking a tract
How to re-mark a farm tract on recent sales and recompute its loan-to-value, worked through
In shortFind recent arm's-length sales of similar land nearby, set aside family sales and sales with buildings, adjust each remaining sale for date, soil and size, and take the indicated value per acre. Multiply by the acres, add up the tracts, and divide the loan balance by the total. The arithmetic is simple; the judgment is in which sales count.
Take the example's South Creek tract: 320 acres in Hardin County, Iowa, with a soil productivity index (Iowa's CSR2, Corn Suitability Rating 2) of 61, part of it not tiled. Six sales happened within 12 miles in the past year. Two are set aside: a sale between family members at $10,900 an acre, which is not arm's-length, and a farm with a building site and 60,000 bushels of grain bins at $11,400, which is not bare land.
Sale
Acres · soil index
Price an acre
Date
Soil
Size
Adjusted
S1 · November 14, 2025, cash
152 · 58
$7,640
−$80
+$240
+$80
$7,880
S2 · February 3, 2026, sealed bid
200 · 66
$8,310
−$60
−$240
+$40
$8,050
S3 · April 21, 2026, public auction
80 · 55
$7,700
−$30
+$300
−$250
$7,720
S4 · July 18, 2026, cash
240 · 64
$8,250
$0
−$160
+$60
$8,150
Indicated value
320 acres
$7,950 × 320 = $2,544,000
Fictional example. The four adjusted prices average $7,950. The March 2023 appraisal valued the tract at $9,250 an acre on 2022 sales; the re-mark is 14.1% lower.
The poorest tract fell furthest: South Creek lost 14% while the home farm lost 2%
Brekke Valley Farms' six tracts, value per acre
March 2023 appraisalQ3 2026 re-mark
T1 Home farm · 240 ac · index 86$13.4K$13.2K
T2 North 160 · 160 ac · index 82$12.9K$12.5K
T3 Ellis 80 · 80 ac · index 79$12.3K$11.8K
T5 Iowa River 220 · 220 ac · index 74$11.1K$10.2K
T6 Gifford 160 · 160 ac · index 68$10.4K$9,400
T4 South Creek · 320 ac · index 61$9,250$7,950
Fictional example from this guide
Show the numbers
March 2023 appraisal
Q3 2026 re-mark
T1 Home farm · 240 ac · index 86
$13.4K
$13.2K
T2 North 160 · 160 ac · index 82
$12.9K
$12.5K
T3 Ellis 80 · 80 ac · index 79
$12.3K
$11.8K
T5 Iowa River 220 · 220 ac · index 74
$11.1K
$10.2K
T6 Gifford 160 · 160 ac · index 68
$10.4K
$9,400
T4 South Creek · 320 ac · index 61
$9,250
$7,950
From tracts to loan-to-value
Step 1
Add up the tracts
Six tracts re-mark from $13,330,000 to $12,403,000, down $927,000 or 7.0%. South Creek alone accounts for $416,000 of the fall.
Step 2
Divide the balance
$9,348,600 ÷ $12,403,000 = 75.4%, against 70.1% on the old appraisal ($9,348,600 ÷ $13,330,000). The loan crosses a 75% watch line.
Step 3
Look at the whole relationship
Across all three of the family's loans, its relationship with the lender, and with machinery, the planter and the cattle added, collateral of $18,983,440 falls to $17,945,424 against $12,845,000 of exposure: 67.7% to 71.6%, coverage 1.48 times to 1.40 times.
Two habits make the arithmetic honest. First, use the same policy every quarter: a radius, a time window, a minimum number of sales and a soil band, so the value does not depend on who ran it. Second, send any tract with fewer sales than the policy minimum to a review appraiser instead of stretching the radius until the number looks right. A tract re-mark of this kind is an evaluation for monitoring; when it pushes a loan over a line, the answer is to order an appraisal.
07 · Land values in 2026
Farmland values in 2026: up 3.4% in USDA's annual survey, flat to lower in the lenders' quarterly ones
In shortUSDA's July 2026 report put US farm real estate at $4,500 an acre, up 3.4%, and Iowa at $10,100, up 3.2%. Lender surveys taken through the year are cooler: Chicago Fed District values were flat in nominal terms and down 3.7% after inflation by mid-2026, and 56% of its lenders called farmland overvalued. Poorer land fell further in Indiana. A lender re-marking a book should use local sales and treat every average as a direction, never a value.
Iowa farm real estate passed $10,000 an acre in 2026 and has risen every year since 2022
Average value of farm land and buildings, dollars per acre, surveyed April to June each year
USDA's Land Values summary comes from a survey of about 30,000 operations taken from April to June. It reports state and regional averages: US cropland $6,020 an acre (+3.3%) and pasture $2,000 (+4.2%); Iowa cropland $10,700 (+3.9%); Corn Belt farm real estate $8,540 (+3.5%); Nebraska $4,400 (+3.5%).5 It is the most complete public measure, published once a year and revised later, and it has no county or tract values.
What lenders said during the year
Chicago Fed · Q1 2026
56% said overvalued
104 lenders in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan and Wisconsin: values up 3% on the year, "good" land down 1% in the quarter; 56% called farmland overvalued and 1% undervalued; the renewals and extensions index reached 136, "its highest value since the second quarter of 2020"; collateral required somewhat higher than a year earlier.21
Chicago Fed · Q2 2026
Flat, and 3.7% lower after inflation
79 lenders: District values "flat in the second quarter of 2026 from a year earlier", a 3.7% decline after inflation; Illinois and Iowa up, Indiana and Wisconsin down; 14% expected a decline in the third quarter, 81% stability.6
Kansas City Fed · Q1 and Q2 2026
Ranchland at records
Ranchland up nearly 11% on the year in the first quarter, at "new record highs alongside ongoing strength in the cattle sector", and more than 7% in the second, when nonirrigated cropland rose about 1% and irrigated about 4%. 129 lenders responded in the first quarter, 142 in the second.22,23
Iowa State · late 2025
An uneven adjustment
Iowa average $11,549 an acre, +0.7% and still below the 2023 peak of $11,835; 60 counties up in nominal terms but 78 down after inflation; Kossuth County −4.3%, Clayton and Allamakee +4.4%.24
In Indiana, poor land lost 3.1% in a year while top land gained 0.6%
Indiana farmland value per acre by quality, June 2026, with the change from June 2025
Quality spreads are why a county average misleads. Purdue's June 2026 survey found the gap opening in Indiana, and its economists noted a price-to-rent ratio "substantially higher than historical levels".25 But the pattern is not a law: Iowa State's 2025 survey had low-quality Iowa land rising 1.7% while high-quality land rose 0.7%.24 The only safe reading is to measure each band of soil in each county on its own sales, every quarter, and to see which way your own book's tracts are moving.
08 · Machinery values
Farm machinery values: new combine sales fell by a third in 2025 while used auction prices held
In shortMachinery is valued from what similar units bring at dealers and auctions, by make, model, year, hours and condition. In 2025 new combine sales fell 35.6% and tractor sales 9.9%, yet used combine auction values ended the year 7.5% higher than a year earlier. Machinery values do not track the farm economy in a straight line; each category, and each unit, needs its own comparison.
New combine sales fell more than three times as fast as tractor sales in 2025
Fall in US unit sales of new machines from 2024 to 2025
An economist at the University of Illinois summarized the market in February 2026 from equipment makers' and Sandhills Global's data. New sales fell for a second year: tractors 13.2% in 2024 and 9.9% in 2025, combines 24.4% and then 35.6%. Used inventories tightened: used tractor inventories had fallen eight months in a row by December 2025, 15.5% down on the year, and used combine inventories were 9.5% lower. Prices split: used tractor asking prices were 5.85% lower than a year earlier and auction values 2.54% lower, while used combine auction values were 7.47% higher.26
Used market, December 2025 vs a year earlier
Tractors
Combines
Inventory for sale
−15.5%
−9.5%
Asking prices
−5.85%
−0.37%
Auction values
−2.54%
+7.47%
Source: farmdoc daily, February 27, 2026, from Sandhills Global data.26
What a machinery check looks for
Value
Matched comparisons
Auction and dealer results for the same make, model and year, adjusted for hours and condition. A combine's separator hours matter more than its age; a unit with unreported hours is valued no better than its last inspected condition.
Existence
Serial numbers
Every pledged unit's serial number on the security agreement schedule, checked against what is on the farm at a visit and against public sale results between visits.
Replacement
Trades and upgrades
A unit traded in for a newer one should appear on an amended schedule with the lender's lien on the replacement. FSA's rule allows a release without its approval when the item is "used as a trade-in or source of down payment funds for a like item that will be taken as security".2
09 · Livestock and counts
Livestock collateral: record cattle prices in early 2026, a 6.6% drop by the third quarter, and why counts matter more than prices
In shortLivestock collateral is priced by class and weight from weekly market reports and counted on the farm or from the borrower's inventory reports. Feeder cattle prices peaked in the second quarter of 2026 and fell in the third, so the same herd lost value in a quarter. Price moves are visible to everyone; missing head are not, which is why a count that ties to sales and deposits is the core check.
Feeder steer prices peaked in the second quarter of 2026, then fell 6.6% in the third
Medium Frame No. 1 feeder steers, Oklahoma City, dollars per hundredweight, quarterly average; Q4 2026 is USDA's forecast
USDA's October 2026 outlook reported that 750–800 pound feeder steers at Oklahoma City averaged $347.69 per hundredweight in September 2026, "nearly $20 below September 2025", after "2 weeks of sharp declines in late August"; it raised its fourth-quarter forecast to $343. Slaughter steers averaged $221.05 in September, a fourth straight monthly fall. Hog prices in the third quarter were 11.9% below a year earlier.27
Lenders felt the price rise first: the Kansas City Fed found feeder livestock loan volume up about 25% and loan size about 15% over the year to early 2026, as larger loans tracked higher cattle prices.28
What a count checks
Reported against pledged
Head on hand
The borrower's latest inventory report, by class and weight, against the head the security agreement covers. Reports go stale; many lenders set a limit, such as 90 days, after which they count.
Sold against deposited
Where the missing head went
Fewer head than pledged is normal in a feeding operation. It passes when the sale matches a deposit to the operating account. A drop with no sale and no deposit is the finding.
Seen on the farm
Counted and identified
Farm Credit's rule asks evaluations to describe "quantity, species/variety, measure/weight" and the "type of identification (such as brand…)".9 A count by someone who walks the pens is the only proof a herd exists.
The ghost cattle case. From 2016 to November 2020 a Washington rancher billed a meat packer and a second company for the care of more than 265,000 head of cattle that did not exist, collecting more than $244 million. He was sentenced in October 2022 to 11 years in prison.29 The money was lost by the companies billed for the cattle's care. A lender guards against the same failure: paperwork for animals nobody had counted.
10 · Crops, insurance, payments
Growing crops, crop insurance assignments and government payments: the collateral that exists only on paper for most of the year
In shortAn operating line is often secured by a crop that is not yet harvested and by the insurance on it. The lien on a growing crop can outrank the landowner's mortgage, but the insurance indemnity reaches the lender only through the insurer's own assignment form, renewed every crop year. In 2026 government payments are a large part of farm income, and they too need the lender's paperwork to reach the loan.
Under Article 9, "A perfected security interest in crops growing on real property has priority over a conflicting interest of an encumbrancer or owner of the real property if the debtor has an interest of record in or is in possession of the real property."14 Tenant farmers' crops can secure their lines even on mortgaged land. But a growing crop is a promise: it can fail, and when it does, the collateral is the insurance check.
The crop insurance assignment
The federal Common Crop Insurance Policy lets a farmer assign the right to an indemnity "for the crop year only to creditors or other persons to whom you have a financial debt". The assignment "must be on our form", and without it the insurer "will not make any payment to a lienholder … even if you may have a lien or other assignment recorded elsewhere".
With it, "Only one payment will be issued jointly in the names of all assignees and you", and an assignee may file the claim itself up to 30 days after the farmer's deadline if the farmer does not.4 Monitoring therefore includes a yearly question for every insured borrower: is this crop year's assignment on file with this insurer?
Federal crop insurance carries $168 billion of liability on 2026 crops so far
Liability on non-livestock policies, by crop year, as of October 26, 2026
$181.6B2023
$158.7B2024
$159.4B2025
$168B2026 to date
Source30 · 2026 is incomplete; policies for some crops are still being written.
Show the numbers
Period
Value
2023
$181.6B
2024
$158.7B
2025
$159.4B
2026 to date
$168B
The program is large: policies on 561 million net acres for the 2025 crop year and 573 million so far for 2026, with $11.6 billion of 2025 indemnities paid to date.30 For a lender, that is the scale of money that reaches a farmer, and either reaches the loan or does not, depending on a one-page form.
Government payments are forecast at $47.4 billion in 2026, up $19.5 billion on 2025
US farm cash receipts and payments, 2026 forecast, billions of dollars
Animal and animal product receipts−5.4% on 2025287.3 billion
Crop receipts+6.1% on 2025253 billion
Direct government payments+$19.5 billion on 202547.4 billion
USDA's September 2026 forecast has net farm income at $158.4 billion, down 2.6% (5.5% after inflation), with production expenses up 4.5% to $492.8 billion. Supplemental and disaster assistance, including the Farmer Bridge Assistance Program, make up $26.5 billion of the payments.31 A lender relying on those payments to repay a line needs to know they will be paid to the borrower, and how they reach the loan.
11 · What goes wrong
How farm collateral is lost: sold without a release, proceeds diverted, counts that never happened, values nobody updated
In shortMost losses are quiet. A pledged machine is sold at an auction the lender never sees; a cattle check is endorsed without the lender; a notice to a grain buyer lapses; a herd count is copied from last year's report; a land value is four years old when the loan goes bad. Each is found late because nothing in a performing loan forces the question.
A quarter of FSA borrowers visited had removed pledged collateral without permission
25 in 100
FSA direct-loan borrowers had removed collateral without permission, in a sample of 71 visited by USDA's inspector general (reported 2010)
FSA direct-loan borrowers had removed collateral without permission, in a sample of 71 visited by USDA's inspector general (reported 2010)
25 of 100
The inspector general's sample was small and the report dates from 2010, but what it found is the failure this guide is about. Borrowers sold tractors or wagons and said they forgot to report it; officials approved the sales after the fact in nearly all cases; inspections were due only every two or three years. The report warned that lax enforcement could encourage others to sell collateral.7
Failure
A real example
What would have caught it
Proceeds diverted
An Iowa hog farmer whose bank required two-party checks from a cooperative and an auction forged the bank's signature on them at least 20 times, diverting more than $400,000 of collateral; sentenced to 13 years in April 2026, with other frauds.32
Matching sales at the buyer to deposits and loan payments, every month
Livestock that never existed
More than 265,000 "ghost cattle" billed over four years, more than $244 million.29
Counts by someone independent; reports reconciled to purchases and sales
Pledged equipment sold
USDA's inspector general: a quarter of borrowers visited.7
Serial numbers checked against auction and dealer results between visits
Notice or filing defects
Filings lost in bankruptcy over a nickname and a missing "Inc."19
Legal names checked against the filing; notices amended within 3 months3
Stale values
The guidelines list passage of time and market volatility as reasons a value no longer holds.1
Quarterly re-marks with a re-appraisal trigger
Machinery and livestock carry the most risk of going missing; land carries the most risk of going stale
How exposed each kind of collateral is to each failure
LowMediumHigh
Sold or removedProceeds divertedValue staleLien or notice defectFarmlandLowLowHighMediumMachineryHighMediumMediumMediumFeeder livestockHighHighMediumHighBreeding stockMediumMediumMediumMediumStored grainHighHighLowHighInsurance and paymentsLowHighLowHigh
Our reading of the sources7,32,29,1,3 · Our reading of the cases and rules above; weigh it against your own losses.
Show the numbers
Sold or removed
Proceeds diverted
Value stale
Lien or notice defect
Farmland
Low
Low
High
Medium
Machinery
High
Medium
Medium
Medium
Feeder livestock
High
High
Medium
High
Breeding stock
Medium
Medium
Medium
Medium
Stored grain
High
High
Low
High
Insurance and payments
Low
High
Low
High
Conversion is also a federal crime when the property is pledged to one of the Farm Credit lenders or USDA farm credit agencies the statute names: knowingly concealing, removing or disposing of it "with intent to defraud" carries up to five years in prison.16 Prosecution comes after the loss. Monitoring is what shortens the time between the sale and the lender's knowledge of it.
12 · The 2026 farm economy
Why collateral is getting more attention in 2026: thinner margins, more renewals, more family farm bankruptcies
In shortFarm income is holding up on government payments while expenses rise; lenders report more renewals and extensions, higher collateral requirements and slower repayment; family farm bankruptcies rose 23% in the year to September 2026. Interest rates eased a little. When cash flow tightens, the collateral cushion is what protects the loan, so its accuracy matters more.
Midwest farm loan rates were about half a point lower in mid-2026 than a year earlier
Average interest rates on new farm loans, Seventh Federal Reserve District, end of the second quarter
The Chicago Fed's repayment index was 63 in the first quarter of 2026, down from a year earlier for the tenth straight quarter, and 73 in the second; renewals and extensions reached 136 before easing to 124. Lenders said 17% of their borrowers carried more debt into 2026 than into 2025.21,6
Problem balances
Stress is modest, and rising slowly
Kansas City Fed lenders put less than 10% of farm loan balances in major or severe repayment trouble in the second quarter of 2026 and about 15% in minor trouble.23 In the first quarter they called the deterioration in repayment "modest, but persistent".22
Chapter 12 family farm bankruptcies rose 23% in the year to September 2026, more than double the 2023 count
Chapter 12 filings in the 12 months ending September 30 of each year
Who lends matters for which rules apply. In 2021 the Farm Credit System provided 45% of farm sector debt and commercial banks 35%, together 80%.34 Farm Credit lenders follow the FCA's collateral rules; banks follow the interagency appraisal rules and guidelines; both follow FSA's rules on the loans FSA guarantees, and the Food Security Act and state law on every lien.
13 · How it is done today
Today's farm collateral routine: five roles, a once-a-year check, and the days a quarterly review takes
In shortFour or five roles share the work: loan officers visit farms and collect inventories, collateral staff keep liens and notices current, review appraisers and an appraisal manager own values, and the chief credit officer reports to the board. Most of the checking happens once a year at renewal. The hours go to travel, matching schedules to what is on the farm, re-keying values and assembling the board report.
Ag loan officerVisits farms, collects balance sheets and inventories, sees the machinery and the cattle, takes the borrower's call when a unit is traded.
Collateral and servicing staffFiles financing statements and notices to buyers, keeps insurance assignments, releases liens on payment, tracks expirations.
Rural appraisal managerOwns valuation policy and the appraiser panel, orders appraisals, decides when an evaluation is enough.
Review appraiserChecks appraisals and evaluations, especially values with thin sales support.
Chief credit officerSets the watch lines, signs the portfolio report to the board's risk committee, answers to examiners.
Most lenders re-check farm collateral once a year, at renewal, and land only when new money is lent
A typical cycle for one operating line and its land loan
1Annual review
Balance sheet, income, inventory of grain, livestock and machinery.
Loan officerAt renewal
2Farm visit
Machinery serials seen, cattle counted or estimated, bins measured.
Loan officerOnce a year
3Values updated
Chattel re-priced from guides or recent sales; land left at its appraisal unless new money.
Loan officer, appraisal staffAt renewal
4Liens refreshed
Notices to buyers re-sent, filings continued, insurance assignment for the new crop year.
Collateral staffEach crop year
5Portfolio report
Loan-to-value by band, exceptions, watch list.
Credit administrationQuarterly or yearly
Illustrative · replace with your own numbers · A pattern drawn from the rules and common practice; your cycle may differ.
Show the numbers
Step
What happens
Who
Time
Annual review
Balance sheet, income, inventory of grain, livestock and machinery.
Loan officer
At renewal
Farm visit
Machinery serials seen, cattle counted or estimated, bins measured.
Loan officer
Once a year
Values updated
Chattel re-priced from guides or recent sales; land left at its appraisal unless new money.
Loan officer, appraisal staff
At renewal
Liens refreshed
Notices to buyers re-sent, filings continued, insurance assignment for the new crop year.
Collateral staff
Each crop year
Portfolio report
Loan-to-value by band, exceptions, watch list.
Credit administration
Quarterly or yearly
Gathering evidence and re-valuing take most of a manual quarterly review
Days of staff time in one quarterly review of a whole book, by stage, our estimate
Gathering sales, auction results and pricesRe-valuing land, machinery and livestockRecomputing loan-to-value and the watch listDeciding re-appraisals and drafting ordersWriting and signing the report
A manual quarterly review8 days12 days4 days4 days4 days
Illustrative · replace with your own numbers · Illustrative split of 32 staff days for a book of about 1,200 loans. No public time study exists; time your own quarter.
Show the numbers
Gathering sales, auction results and prices
Re-valuing land, machinery and livestock
Recomputing loan-to-value and the watch list
Deciding re-appraisals and drafting orders
Writing and signing the report
A manual quarterly review
8 days
12 days
4 days
4 days
4 days
Renewal updates, outside appraisers or collateral data tools
Approach
How it works
Strength
Weakness
In house, at renewal
Loan officers update values and inventories in the annual review; appraisal staff re-appraise land on new money
People who know the farm and the family
Up to a year late; values vary by officer; land values age for years
Outsourced appraisal and inspection
A panel of fee appraisers and field inspectors on a schedule or on triggers
Independent, certified values
Fees and weeks per tract; cannot cover a whole book each quarter
Data and software
Land sales data, equipment value guides, market price feeds; spreadsheets or tools that re-price the book
Whole-book coverage, every quarter
Usually one asset class at a time; someone still has to decide and act
The approaches combine. The question each lender has to answer is which loans get a person's attention this quarter, and whether that choice rests on evidence or on the calendar.
Part B · See it working
Botminds Agricultural Collateral Monitoring, re-valuing a fictional Iowa lender's whole farm book in one quarter
Part A described the work without naming a product. This part shows how Botminds does it at a fictional agricultural lender in central Iowa with 1,186 secured loans to 842 borrowers and $1.24 billion of exposure. Every farm, person, appraiser, auction, price and number in the screens is sample data, including the market prices the screens use.
14 · One quarter, start to finish
Ridgefold's third quarter on screen: a stale appraisal, a sold planter and 31 requests signed off
In shortThis is the example from the top of the page, inside the product. Six agents re-value every pledged tract, machine and head against the quarter's sales, auction results and market reports, recompute loan-to-value on every loan, and draft the re-appraisal orders, inspections, counts and alerts. Ingrid Sorensen, the rural appraisal manager, reads the evidence, approves the re-mark and the requests, and signs the coverage report; Paul Vandermeer, the chief credit officer, signs second.
1
The whole book on one map, at the June values
Monday morning, October 12, 2026. Ingrid opens the collateral book as of the second-quarter mark: $2,267.3 million of pledged collateral drawn as one map, farmland $1,712.4 million, machinery $412.6 million and livestock $142.3 million, each block split by county and each tile sized by value.
The run log says the third-quarter evidence is in: 214 recorded farmland sales, 9,860 dealer and auction results, 13 weeks of livestock prices and 402 head counts. Book loan-to-value is 54.7%, and 19 loans sit at or above their watch line.
The book at the June values. Every tile is pledged collateral, sized by value; the rail shows the three passes still to run.
2
One click re-values the book, class by class
Ingrid runs the third-quarter re-mark. The farmland pass re-values 1,630 tracts from county sales and land value surveys; the machinery pass matches 4,212 units to auction and dealer results, 4,166 of them by serial number; the livestock pass prices 70,900 head by class and weight. The tiles re-color pass by pass.
Farmland ends 2.9% lower, machinery 5.6% lower and livestock 6.3% higher on the product's sample prices. The book is $2,203.5 million, $63.8 million lower, loan-to-value is 56.3%, 37 loans sit at or above their watch line, and four borrowers have collateral worth less than 1.20 times what they owe.
After the re-mark. Red tiles lost value, green gained; four borrowers below 1.20 times coverage are ringed and listed. The livestock gain comes from the product's sample prices; real feeder cattle prices fell in the third quarter of 2026 (Part A, section 09).
3
Three combines take a custom harvester below the floor
Ingrid replays the machinery pass. In Hamilton County, Nygaard Custom Harvest, which harvests other farms' crops for hire, pledges three combines against $2.26 million of exposure. Its 2022 Class 9 combine re-marks from $572,000 to $498,000 on an auction result; two 2021 Class 8s fall 15.0% and 11.1% on an auction result and dealer listings. Collateral falls from $2.78 million to $2.62 million, and coverage from 1.23 times to 1.16 times, under the lender's 1.20 floor.
Separator hours have not been reported since January, so the values are held at the last inspected condition and a machinery inspection is drafted to the loan officer.
What moved it. Each combine's old and new value, with the sale or listing behind it, and the inspection drafted because hours were not reported.
4
Brekke Valley Farms: one tract carries most of the fall
In Hardin County, Brekke Valley Farms' six tracts re-mark from $13.33 million to $12.40 million, down 7.0%. The panel lists each tract with its soil index, its old and new value per acre and its sales support. South Creek, 320 acres with a soil index of 61, falls from $9,250 to $7,950 an acre on four arm's-length sales within 12 miles; two other sales are set aside.
Relationship coverage moves from 1.48 times to 1.40 times, still above the floor; but the farmland loan alone crosses its 75% line.
A borrower's tracts. Six tracts, each with its soil index, old and new value per acre, and the sales behind it; the poorest soil fell most.
5
The relationship, and the planter that was sold
The relationship screen bridges the collateral from $18,983,440 to $17,945,424: land −$927,000, machinery −$335,000, the planter −$164,000, cattle +$387,984. Farmland loan RE-4471 is now at 75.4% on an appraisal 43 months old, so a re-appraisal order to the lender's appraiser panel is drafted: six tracts, fee $3,400, due November 13.
The second finding is the planter. The 24-row unit on schedule A, serial ending 4471, appears in an auction result: sold August 22, 2026 in Eldora for $148,500, with no release asked for and no payment to the line. A conversion alert to the loan officer, Cody Brandt, is drafted: ask for the proceeds, or for a replacement unit pledged in its place. The cattle count passes: 1,040 head reported against 1,150 pledged, and the 110 sold on September 18 match a $271,800 deposit on September 21.
The relationship. Three loans, a bridge from the last mark to now, and findings each tied to an appraisal, a sale, an auction result or an inventory report.
6
Approve, send, sign
Ingrid approves the re-mark. She approves and sends all 31 requests: 14 re-appraisal orders, $46,100 in fees, 9 machinery inspections, 6 livestock counts and 2 conversion alerts. Then she signs the quarterly coverage report, and Paul Vandermeer signs second before it goes to the board's risk committee.
Of the 612 tracts appraised more than three years earlier, only those behind the 14 loans whose cushion thinned get a new appraisal this quarter, one order per loan.
The signed coverage report. Summary, collateral by class and the watch list, two signatures, and the checks done before signing. The draft's line about "record prices" reflects the product's sample market; real feeder steer prices peaked in the second quarter of 2026.
Of 1,186 loans re-marked, 14 needed a new appraisal this quarter
Ridgefold's third-quarter re-mark, from every loan to the re-appraisal orders
Loans re-marked1,186
At 75% loan-to-value or above41
At or above their own watch line37
New to the watch list this quarter18
Re-appraisals ordered14
Fictional example from this guide · Farmland loans watch at 75%, machinery and livestock loans at 80%, so 41 loans are at 75% or above and 37 at their own line.
Show the numbers
Stage
Count
Loans re-marked
1,186
At 75% loan-to-value or above
41
At or above their own watch line
37
New to the watch list this quarter
18
Re-appraisals ordered
14
15 · Every screen
What else the re-mark shows: comparable sales, soil bands, sold machinery, head counts, the watch list and the policy
In shortEach screen answers one question a manager, appraiser or loan officer asks: which sales moved this tract, which county and soil band fell, which machines were sold, which herds do not tie, which loans crossed their line, what was ordered, and which rules the quarter followed.
Comparable sales for one tract. Four sales used, each adjusted for date, soil and size; a family sale and a sale with buildings set aside; any sale can be switched off to see the value without it.
Farmland by county and soil. The sales around the subject tract, and change by county and soil band. In this sample book poorer soils fell furthest, as in Indiana in 2026; Iowa's 2025 survey showed the opposite, so the pattern is measured, never assumed.
The quarterly re-mark, approved. The evidence read, each agent's step with what it found, and loans by loan-to-value band at June 30 and September 30.
Machinery. Change by category, and two pledged units found in sale results by serial number, $189,500 of sale proceeds that never reached the loans.
Head counts against the pledge. A drop passes when a sale matches a deposit; 340 head missing with no sale, or a report 177 days old, draws a count.
Livestock prices by class. The weekly price used for each class and its effect on value. These prices are the product's sample data; real feeder prices are in Part A.
Portfolio coverage. Loans by band and by type, and the watch list with the reason, the oldest valuation and the action for each.
Requests, approved and sent. Each order with its reason, its appraiser or officer, fee and due date; nothing leaves until the manager approves.
Your collateral policy as settings. Watch lines, re-appraisal triggers, the coverage floor and the evidence rules, versioned on the audit trail.
16 · Who values, who signs
Who reads the sales, who values each kind of collateral, and the two people who sign the quarter
In shortEach agent does one job and has written limits. None of them replaces an appraisal, changes a risk rating or sends anything on its own. A named person approves every re-mark and every request, and two people sign the coverage report.
Sales and price reader
Reads recorded farmland sales, land value surveys, dealer and auction results, livestock price reports and borrower inventory reports, and flags sales that are not arm's-length.
Never uses a sale it cannot tie to a recorded deed, or treats a family transfer as arm's-length.
Farmland valuer
Re-marks every pledged tract by sales comparison, adjusted for soil, size, drainage and date, and shows the sales behind each value.
Never replaces an appraisal; a tract with fewer than three sales goes to a review appraiser.
Machinery valuer
Matches every pledged unit to dealer and auction results by make, model, year, hours and serial number, and spots pledged serials that have been sold.
Never values a unit above its last inspected condition; every sold serial raises an alert.
Livestock valuer
Prices each borrower's head count by class and weight at weekly market prices, and matches sales to deposits.
Never counts livestock it has no report or count for; a drop passes only when a sale matches a deposit.
Coverage checker
Recomputes loan-to-value for every loan and relationship on current values, tests the watch lines and ranks the watch list.
Never changes a risk rating or a loan's terms.
Request drafter
Drafts re-appraisal orders, inspection and count requests, conversion alerts and the quarterly coverage report.
Never sends anything without the manager's approval; a fee above the cap goes to the chief credit officer.
Who approves a farm collateral re-mark and signs the coverage report
ApprovesRural appraisal managerReads the evidence, approves the re-mark, approves or edits every order, inspection, count and alert, and signs the coverage report first.
Second signatureChief credit officerSigns the coverage report for the board's risk committee and approves any appraisal fee above the cap.
ReviewsReview appraiserReviews every value with thin support, with the sales used and set aside in front of her.
Values are evaluations for monitoring and are labeled that way. Each approval, order and signature is recorded with who, what and when, apart from the agents' steps; changes to the settings are versioned.
Ingrid, Paul, Tessa and Cody: Ridgefold's fictional valuation team
Fictional, from the sample data
IS
Ingrid Sorensen · rural appraisal manager
Owns valuation for 1,186 secured loans with three review appraisers; 612 of 1,630 pledged tracts were last appraised more than three years ago.
"Half the values in our files are older than the land market's last turn."
PV
Paul Vandermeer · chief credit officer
Signs the quarterly coverage report to the board's risk committee.
"Tell me which loans lost their cushion."
TL
Tessa Lindqvist · review appraiser
Reviews every value flagged as weakly supported.
"Give me the comps, and the ones you threw out."
CB
Cody Brandt · ag loan officer, Iowa Falls
96 relationships, including Brekke Valley Farms.
"If I call a borrower about value, I need to know which tract and why."
17 · What goes in and out
What the quarterly re-mark reads from your systems and the market, and what it hands back
In shortIt reads evidence a review appraiser would use and the lender's own loan and collateral records, applies the lender's collateral policy, and leaves behind current values with their evidence, loan-to-value on every loan, drafted requests and a signed quarterly report. The loan system stays the system of record.
Market evidence
Recorded farmland sales with soil and parcel data
University and lender land value surveys
Dealer listings and auction results
Weekly livestock prices by class and weight
From the lender
Collateral records and the last appraisals
Security agreement schedules with serial numbers
Borrower inventory reports and operating account deposits
Loan balances, commitments and your collateral policy
Agents read, re-value and draftEvery tract, unit and head, every quarter, under your collateral policy
The manager approves every request
Every value linked to its evidence
Outputs
Updated collateral values with their evidence
Loan-to-value and coverage by loan and relationship
The watch list, with reasons and actions
Re-appraisal orders, inspections, counts and conversion alerts
The quarterly coverage report, signed twice
What changes for the team
Appraisals ordered where the cushion thinned
Pledged sales found in the quarter they happen
Counts asked for where they do not tie
Loan, deposit, land sales and auction data a re-mark connects to
Collateral recordsTracts, schedules, serials, liens
Deposit systemOperating account deposits for sale matching
Land sales dataRecorded deeds you license or collect
Equipment valuesAuction and dealer results you license
Livestock pricesPublic weekly market reports
Appraiser panelOrders out, appraisals back
Identity and accessApprovers, signing roles, separation of duties
For each, check whether it has an API, a file feed, or only screens, and who owns it.
What the sample quarter shows: estimates and design targets
Most of a quarterly review's days are in gathering and re-valuing, which is where software helps
Staff days for one quarterly review of the whole book, by stage
By hand (estimate)With the solution (estimate)
Gathering sales, auction results and prices81
Re-valuing land, machinery and livestock122
Recomputing loan-to-value and the watch list40.5
Deciding re-appraisals and drafting orders41
Writing and signing the report41
Illustrative · replace with your own numbers · Estimates from the solution's design, made before any measurement. Time your own quarter before and during a pilot.
Show the numbers
By hand (estimate)
With the solution (estimate)
Gathering sales, auction results and prices
8
1
Re-valuing land, machinery and livestock
12
2
Recomputing loan-to-value and the watch list
4
0.5
Deciding re-appraisals and drafting orders
4
1
Writing and signing the report
4
1
1
Every quarter
Every pledged tract, unit and head re-marked each quarter, against the next appraisal or renewal today. Design target.
2
14 of 612
Re-appraisal orders where coverage thinned, against 612 aged tracts, in the sample quarter. Design target.
3
2 units, $189,500
Pledged machinery found sold at auction with no release, in the sample quarter.
Part C · Are you ready to automate?
Weighing automation for your farm collateral book: what stale values cost, what you get back, and how to start
You value, inspect or report on the collateral behind farm loans, or run the people who do, or answer to the board and the examiners for it. This part is written for you: what stale values and missing collateral cost, what automating the re-mark could return, whether your team is ready, and what to ask any vendor, including us.
18 · What stale values cost
The price of a stale farmland value or a sold planter, and how to put a number on yours
In shortNobody publishes what stale collateral values cost farm lenders. What is published is the size of the exposure, the rise in farm stress and the frequency of unauthorized sales. The costs you can measure yourself are appraisal fees spent on the wrong tracts, staff days spent re-keying values, and sale proceeds that never reached a loan.
$605B
of US farm debt forecast for 2026, up 4.6%, two-thirds of it secured by real estate.8
USDA ERS, September 3, 2026
+23%
more Chapter 12 family farm bankruptcies in the year to September 30, 2026: 361 against 293.33
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
1 in 4
FSA direct-loan borrowers visited by USDA's inspector general had removed collateral without permission.7
USDA OIG audit, reported 2010
Re-appraising only where the cushion thinned cost $46,100; ordering every aged tract on its own could cost up to about $2 million
Appraisal fees in Ridgefold's third quarter, two policies
Every tract appraised over three years ago (612)Only loans over their line on an aged appraisal (14)
Appraisal fees for the quarter$2M$46.1K
Fictional example from this guide · An upper bound: 612 tracts at the sample's average fee of $3,293 an order ($46,100 ÷ 14). One order can cover several tracts (Brekke's six tracts are one $3,400 order), so a calendar rule would cost less. Fictional example; your fees and policy will differ.
Show the numbers
Every tract appraised over three years ago (612)
Only loans over their line on an aged appraisal (14)
Appraisal fees for the quarter
$2M
$46.1K
What nobody publishes. There is no public figure for the share of farm loans carrying a value more than three years old, the cost of a farm appraisal, the time a quarterly collateral review takes, the loss rate on converted collateral, or how often a buyer notice has lapsed. Vendor figures for these come without a dataset. Measure your own.
Measuring stale values, appraisal fees and converted collateral
Cost
Where it hides
How to find your number in a week
Stale land values
Loans whose last appraisal predates the 2024–2026 turn
Count pledged tracts by appraisal date; re-price 20 of the oldest on recent county sales and compare
Appraisal fees on the wrong tracts
Calendar-driven re-appraisals of loans with plenty of cushion
List last year's re-appraisals; mark which loans were above their watch line when ordered
Staff days
Gathering prices, re-keying values, assembling the board report
Time one quarter's review by stage, including loan officers' hours
Converted collateral
Machinery traded or sold without a release; cattle sold with proceeds not applied
Pull last year's releases and charge-offs; check 50 pledged serials against public sale results
Lapsed protections
Buyer notices older than a year, filings near expiry, missing insurance assignments
Values the lender cannot support on classified loans
Read the last two exam reports for collateral and appraisal comments
Yesterday's land values and a planter in another county
The loan graded on yesterday's landA credit that looks well secured on a 2022 appraisal can be classified late, with the reserve to match.
The machine in another countyA lien that follows a sold planter is worth less every month it is not found.
The relationship call made too lateA borrower asked about a missing unit at renewal has had a year to spend the money.
The board's false comfortA book-wide average hides the loans whose cushion went, until a workout shows them.
The appraiser who leavesMarket knowledge that lives in one person's head goes when she does.
19 · Your return
Fees, staff days and recovered proceeds: a calculator for the return on a quarterly re-mark
In shortPut in your own numbers. The calculator values the staff days a quarterly review takes now and after, the appraisal fees you would spend on a calendar rule against triggers, and the sale proceeds you would recover sooner, then subtracts what the tool and your testing cost. Every default is an assumption to replace.
Where a quarterly re-mark saves fees and recovers proceeds
Staff time
Evidence gathered and re-priced for you
Sales, auction results and prices arrive read and matched; staff work the flagged loans.
4 quarters × days saved per review × loaded daily cost
Appraisal fees
Orders where the cushion thinned
Re-appraisals follow loan-to-value and evidence instead of the calendar.
(calendar orders − triggered orders) × average fee
Recoveries
Sales found in the quarter they happen
Serial and count checks every quarter find pledged sales while the money can still be traced.
proceeds found a year × share recovered because found early
Credit grading
Ratings on current values
Loans that crossed their line are seen in the quarter they crossed it.
loans newly over the line found a quarter earlier
Exams
Values an examiner can test
Every value with its sales, results and reports behind it.
hours spent assembling support for exams
Board reporting
A report that names loans
The quarterly report lists each loan over its line, with the action taken.
days to produce the quarterly report, before and after
Fees, staff days and proceeds on your own farm book
No input here comes from a published survey: there is none for farm collateral reviews. Every input is an assumption, marked illustrative. Replace them with your own.
Staff timeAppraisalsConverted collateralYour cost
Illustrative yearly value
Staff time released, valued$0
Appraisal fees not spent$0
Proceeds recovered sooner$0
After your yearly cost$0
Staff days released a year0
Formulas, per year: Staff time = 4 × (days today − days with automation) × daily cost Fees not spent = (calendar re-appraisals − triggered re-appraisals) × average fee Proceeds recovered sooner = proceeds found × extra share recovered After your cost = the three lines − yearly cost
The 32 days and 5.5 days describe a quarterly review of about 1,200 loans by hand and with the solution, as estimated in its design; neither is a measurement. A daily cost of $460 is the US median credit analyst wage, $40.15 an hour in 2025,35 for 8 hours, loaded about 43% for benefits and overhead (our assumption); use your own. Triggered re-appraisals can exceed calendar ones in a falling market, and that is the point: the fees then go where the risk is. Not counted: earlier grading, exam time, the board report.
With the defaults, appraisal fees not spent carry most of the value
Illustrative yearly value by lever, using the calculator's defaults
Staff time released (4 × 26.5 days × $460)$48.8K
Appraisal fees not spent (90 × $3,300)$297K
Proceeds recovered sooner (25% of $400,000)$100K
Illustrative · replace with your own numbers
Show the numbers
Lever
Yearly value
Staff time released (4 × 26.5 days × $460)
$48.8K
Appraisal fees not spent (90 × $3,300)
$297K
Proceeds recovered sooner (25% of $400,000)
$100K
Change the calendar rule and the result changes most: a lender that already orders few appraisals saves little on fees and should judge the case on time and recoveries. A lender with a small book and few chattel loans may not clear its cost at all, and should check that before buying anything.
Start here20 · Readiness check
Nine questions that show whether your collateral records and policy are ready for a quarterly re-mark
In shortScore each question 0, 1 or 2. Eight are scored, for a total out of 16; the ninth is for reflection. The band tells you whether to build a baseline, run a pilot or plan a full rollout.
1
Size of the book
How many secured farm loans, pledged tracts and machinery units do you hold?
Why it mattersVolume decides whether a quarterly whole-book re-mark is possible by hand. Below a few hundred loans, people may manage.
A strong answer"About 1,200 loans, 1,600 tracts and 4,000 units on schedules."
2
Age of your land values
What share of your pledged tracts was last appraised more than three years ago?
Why it mattersValues set before the 2024–2026 turn are where the cushion may have gone unnoticed.6
A strong answer"We know: 37%, listed by loan."
3
Written policy
Are your watch lines, re-appraisal triggers and comparable-sale rules written down?
Why it mattersSoftware applies a policy; it cannot invent one. The 2010 guidelines expect written criteria for new valuations.1
A strong answer"75% for land, 80% for chattel; re-appraise over the line on a value older than 36 months, or on a 10% fall."
4
Collateral records
Are pledged machines on schedules with serial numbers, and tracts with legal descriptions, in a system?
Why it mattersSerial matching and tract re-marks need identifiable collateral. FSA requires it on guaranteed loans.2
A strong answer"Schedules are in the loan system with serials; tracts carry parcel numbers."
5
Market evidence
Do you have recorded land sales, equipment results and livestock prices you can use?
Why it mattersValues are only as good as the sales behind them; Farm Credit's rule names the comparison sources.9
A strong answer"We license county sales and an auction feed; prices come from public market reports."
6
Liens and notices
Can you list, for every operating line, the buyer notices or filings and this crop year's insurance assignment?
Why it mattersA value is worth nothing if a buyer takes the cattle free of your lien.3,4
A strong answer"Yes, with notice dates and buyers, from our collateral system."
7
An owner
Is one person accountable for collateral values across the book, with a sponsor above?
Why it mattersThe work crosses loan officers, appraisal, servicing and credit. Without an owner it stalls.
A strong answer"Our rural appraisal manager, sponsored by the chief credit officer."
8
Governance
Do vendor management and model risk have a path for a tool that estimates collateral values?
Why it mattersA tool that estimates values is likely a model under the April 2026 guidance for banks; Farm Credit lenders follow their own framework.13
A strong answer"Yes: documented data, limits and overrides, and a named approver for every value used."
9
Vision · for reflection
If an examiner picked ten farm loans tomorrow, could you show for each one what the collateral is worth today, why, and where every pledged machine and head is?
Why it mattersYour answer lists the gaps. Each gap is a candidate job for software: gathering, re-pricing, matching or reporting.
A strong answerA short, specific list, for example: "land on this quarter's sales, every serial checked, counts tied to deposits, notices current."
From an appraisal-age baseline to a whole-book re-mark
0–6
Explore
Build the baseline: count tracts by appraisal age, write down your watch lines and triggers, get serials onto schedules, and name an owner. Start with one asset class, often machinery serial checks or land re-marks on the oldest appraisals.
7–11
Ready to pilot
Re-mark one quarter of your own book in parallel with your current process. Compare values with recent appraisals, count the loans found over their lines and the sales found, and keep your people approving every request.
12–16
Ready to implement
Plan the whole book: your policy as settings, data feeds for sales, results and prices, links to the loan and deposit systems, the appraiser panel, approvers and the board report.
21 · Questions for any vendor
Before you buy: fifteen questions that test a vendor's land sales, serial matching, lien tracking and proof
In shortAsk every vendor the same questions, us included. The answers show what evidence the values rest on, how land, machinery and livestock are each handled, what the lender keeps control of, and how you would measure it on your own book.
A
Land sales, serial matches and livestock counts
A1
Which land sales does it use, and how does it decide a sale is arm's-length?
Why it mattersFamily transfers and sales with buildings distort bare-land values.
Strong answer · warning sign
Recorded deeds, rules for setting sales aside, every sale shown.
A county average with no sales listed.
A2
What happens to a tract with too few comparable sales?
Why it mattersThin markets are where estimates go wrong.
Strong answer · warning sign
It goes to a review appraiser, flagged.
The radius widens until a number appears.
A3
How are machines matched: by serial number, or by make and model only?
Why it mattersOnly a serial match finds a pledged unit that was sold.
Strong answer · warning sign
Serial first, model as a fallback, both shown.
"Average value for the model year."
A4
How is livestock priced, and how are counts reconciled with sales and deposits?
Why it mattersPrice is public; missing head are not.
Strong answer · warning sign
By class and weight; drops matched to deposits.
Head count times a price, no reconciliation.
B
Approvals, versioned settings and model risk documentation
B1
Does anything leave the system, an order, an alert, a changed rating, without a named person's approval?
Why it mattersValues are evaluations for monitoring; decisions stay with your people.
Strong answer · warning sign
Nothing; every approval recorded.
Automatic updates to risk ratings.
B2
Can our watch lines, triggers, comparable-sale rules and approvers be set without code, and are changes versioned?
Why it mattersYour policy changes; the tool has to follow it, with a record.
Strong answer · warning sign
Settings, versioned, on the audit trail.
"Our consultants configure it."
B3
What model risk documentation do you provide for the valuation estimates?
Why it mattersThe April 2026 guidance expects tailored model risk management.13
Strong answer · warning sign
Data, methods, limits, testing results.
"It is AI, it learns."
B4
Where is our data kept, who can see it, and can we export everything?
Why it mattersThird-party responsibility stays with you.
Strong answer · warning sign
Named locations, role-based access, full export.
Vague answers on export.
C
Liens and the farm-products rule
C1
Does it track buyer notices, central filings and crop insurance assignments, with renewal dates?
Why it mattersA notice is good for a year; an assignment for one crop year.3,4
Strong answer · warning sign
By borrower, buyer and crop year, with alerts.
Out of scope.
C2
How does it handle borrowers with collateral in a central filing state and a direct notice state?
Why it mattersThe state where products are located decides the rule.3
Strong answer · warning sign
By location of the products.
One rule for the whole book.
C3
For FSA guaranteed loans, does it support the inspection, whereabouts and age requirements?
Why it mattersNegligent servicing can cost the guarantee.2
Strong answer · warning sign
12- and 18-month ages and annual whereabouts tracked.
No FSA knowledge.
D
A back-test on your own farm book, systems and cost
D1
Will you re-mark a past quarter of our book and compare with appraisals we ordered since?
Why it mattersA back-test on your own loans is the only fair measure.
Strong answer · warning sign
Yes, with the differences explained.
Only a demo book.
D2
Which of our systems does it read from and write to, and how?
Why it mattersLoan, deposit and collateral systems decide the effort.
Strong answer · warning sign
APIs or files, named.
"We'll figure it out."
D3
Does it cover land, machinery and livestock in one place, or one at a time?
Why it mattersCoverage is a relationship number; one asset class gives part of it.
Strong answer · warning sign
All three, rolled up by loan and relationship.
One class, export to a spreadsheet.
D4
What does it cost in year one and after, including data licenses?
Why it mattersSales and auction data can cost more than the software.
Strong answer · warning sign
Every line, with data separately.
Data "extra, depending".
22 · How to start
A pilot on one region's farm loans: back-test a past quarter, run the next one in parallel, and measure five things
In shortPick one region or one asset class, write the policy down, re-mark one quarter in parallel with your current process, and compare. Measure loans found over their lines, pledged sales found, value differences against recent appraisals, and staff days. Decide on the numbers.
A twelve-week pilot re-marks one quarter in parallel and decides on measured results
Your teamVendor
Baseline: appraisal ages, last quarter's days
Write watch lines, triggers, sale rules
Load collateral records and data feeds
Back-test a past quarter against appraisals
Live quarter in parallel
Measure and decide
Week 04812
Illustrative · replace with your own numbers
Show the numbers
Activity
From
To
Baseline: appraisal ages, last quarter's days
0
3
Write watch lines, triggers, sale rules
0
2
Load collateral records and data feeds
1
5
Back-test a past quarter against appraisals
4
7
Live quarter in parallel
6
10
Measure and decide
10
12
Start where pledged collateral moves often and a miss costs most: machinery serials and land re-marks
Cost of a miss →
Check on triggers
Automate first
Keep manual for now
Automate the routine
Land re-marksMachinery serialsHead countsBuyer noticesInsurance assignmentsStored grain
How often the collateral changes →
Illustrative · replace with your own numbers
Show the numbers
Item
How often the collateral changes (0–1)
Cost of a miss (0–1)
Land re-marks
0.68
0.80
Machinery serials
0.80
0.70
Head counts
0.74
0.60
Buyer notices
0.12
0.52
Insurance assignments
0.12
0.15
Stored grain
0.70
0.13
Value accuracy, loans and sales found, days and fees
Measure
How
Good result
Value accuracy
Re-marked land values against appraisals completed in the pilot window
Differences explained by named sales
Loans found
Loans over their line found by the re-mark, against your current process
More found, earlier, with fewer false alarms
Sales found
Pledged serials found in sale results; head drops without deposits
Each confirmed or cleared by the loan officer
Staff days
Days for the quarter, by stage, before and in the pilot
Fewer days, spent on the flagged loans
Orders
Re-appraisals ordered and their fees, by trigger
Fees moved to loans with thin cushions
The working-session questions for your team: twelve questions in four groups
Bring loan officers, appraisal, collateral servicing, credit administration, model risk and IT into one room.
A
Which counties, tracts and FSA loans the pilot covers
A1
Which loans and regions are in the pilot, and which stay out?
Why it mattersA clear scope makes the comparison fair.
Strong answer · warning sign
Named counties and loan types.
"Everything."
A2
How many tracts are on appraisals older than three years, by county?
Why it mattersThat is the size of the stale-value problem.
Strong answer · warning sign
A list.
A guess.
A3
Which loans are FSA guaranteed, and what do their age rules require?
Why it mattersFSA's 12- and 18-month limits are hard rules.2
Strong answer · warning sign
Flagged in the loan system.
Unknown.
B
Watch lines, comparable-sale rules and approvers
B1
What are our watch lines for land and chattel, and our re-appraisal triggers?
Why it mattersThey become settings.
Strong answer · warning sign
Written numbers.
"Judgment."
B2
What makes a land sale comparable: radius, months, soil band, minimum count?
Why it mattersThe same rule every quarter keeps values consistent.
Strong answer · warning sign
One rule, with exceptions to review.
Each appraiser's own.
B3
Who approves orders and signs the report, and above what fee does approval move up?
Why it mattersApprovers become roles.
Strong answer · warning sign
Named roles and limits.
Whoever is in.
C
Land sales, serial numbers and deposit feeds
C1
Where do our land sales, equipment results and livestock prices come from today?
Why it mattersLicenses and feeds decide coverage.
Strong answer · warning sign
Named sources.
"The officer looks it up."
C2
Are serial numbers on every security agreement schedule?
Why it mattersNo serial, no match.
Strong answer · warning sign
Yes, in the system.
On paper only.
C3
Can operating account deposits be read to match livestock and grain sales?
Why it mattersA head drop passes only when a sale meets a deposit.
Strong answer · warning sign
A daily file.
Statements by mail.
D
When to expand the re-mark, and who tells borrowers
D1
What result would make us expand, and what would make us stop?
Why it mattersDecide the test before seeing the answer.
Strong answer · warning sign
Written thresholds.
"We'll know."
D2
Who tells loan officers and borrowers what changes?
Why it mattersA conversion alert needs a careful call.
Strong answer · warning sign
A script and an owner.
Nobody.
D3
How will we show examiners the method and its limits?
Why it mattersEvaluations used for monitoring must be supportable.1
In shortShort answers to what people search about farm loan collateral, each one complete on its own.
What is agricultural collateral monitoring?
Agricultural collateral monitoring is a farm lender's ongoing check, between appraisals, that the land, machinery, livestock, crops and payments securing each loan are still there, still covered by valid liens and notices, and still worth enough. It combines re-valuing collateral against recent sales and market prices with inspections, head counts, serial checks and lien reviews. Its purpose is to find thinned cushions and missing collateral in the quarter they happen.
How often should farm loan collateral be inspected?
No rule sets one frequency for every lender. FSA requires guaranteed lenders to inspect collateral "as often as deemed necessary", to account each year for the whereabouts of all collateral on lines of credit and term loans over $100,000, and, for standard eligible lenders, to file an annual farm visit report or collateral inspection. Most lenders visit at least once a year and re-check more often for livestock and stored grain.
What is the Food Security Act farm products rule?
Section 1324 of the Food Security Act of 1985, 7 U.S.C. 1631, lets a buyer of farm products in the ordinary course take them free of the farmer's lender's security interest, even a perfected one. The lender keeps its claim only if it gave the buyer proper written notice within a year before the sale, or filed an effective financing statement in a state with a certified central filing system, and the buyer did not meet the payment terms.
Which states have a central filing system for farm products?
USDA last published a count of 19 certified states, in 2016: Alabama, Colorado, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia and Wyoming. In March 2026 USDA approved moving Oklahoma's system to the Oklahoma County Clerk, effective 180 days later under state law. Other states, including Iowa, rely on direct notice; confirm the current list with USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service.
How does a lender get paid from crop insurance?
Through an assignment of indemnity on the insurer's own form, signed for one crop year. Without it the federal policy says the insurer will not pay a lienholder even if a lien is recorded elsewhere. With it, the insurer issues one check jointly to the farmer and every assignee, and an assignee may file the claim itself up to 30 days after the farmer's deadline.
When does farmland need a new appraisal?
Banks need a certified appraisal for farm real estate transactions above $500,000; Farm Credit lenders need a licensed or certified appraisal above $250,000, and a certified one above $1 million; below those an evaluation is allowed. An existing value can support a later loan action without new money, or if there has been no obvious and material change in market conditions or the property. FSA guaranteed loans need real estate appraisals no older than 18 months above $250,000.
What is the difference between an appraisal and an evaluation?
An appraisal is a valuation by a state licensed or certified appraiser under professional standards, required above regulatory thresholds. An evaluation is a lender's documented estimate of market value used below those thresholds and for monitoring. Farm Credit's rule requires personal property evaluations to name their source of comparisons and describe quantity, weight, condition and date.
What happened to farmland values in 2026?
USDA's July 2026 report put US farm real estate at $4,500 an acre, up 3.4%, and Iowa at $10,100, up 3.2%. Lender surveys were cooler: the Chicago Fed found Midwest values flat over the year to mid-2026 and down 3.7% after inflation, and 56% of its lenders called farmland overvalued in the first quarter. Kansas City Fed lenders reported record ranchland values.
How do you value farm equipment for a loan?
Match each unit to recent dealer and auction results for the same make, model and year, adjusted for hours and condition, and identify it by serial number. Farm Credit's rule names equipment dealer listings, pricing guides and market sales reports as sources. FSA guaranteed loans need chattel appraisals no older than 12 months, based on public sales of similar property in the area.
What is conversion of farm collateral?
Conversion is selling, removing or using pledged property against the lender's rights, such as selling a pledged planter or cattle without a release or keeping the proceeds. It is usually an event of default under the security agreement, and where the property is pledged to one of the Farm Credit lenders or USDA farm credit agencies named in 18 U.S.C. 658, doing it knowingly with intent to defraud is a federal crime.
Can software replace farm appraisals?
No. Software can re-price collateral between appraisals from recorded sales, auction results and market reports, and show which loans need attention, but those values are evaluations for monitoring. A new appraisal is still required where the rules call for one, and a person decides when to order it.
What do FSA guaranteed loan servicing rules require for collateral?
The lender must protect and account for the collateral, obtain insurance and income assignments, inspect as often as needed, ensure the borrower does not convert security, apply sale proceeds by lien priority, and file status reports on March 31 and September 30. A loss caused by negligent servicing cannot be recovered under the guarantee.
24 · One-page summary
Farm collateral monitoring on one page: the method, the rules and the terms
Print this page
In shortThe whole guide on one screen: the method, the rules as of October 2026, the readiness bands and the terms.
The method
Keep every pledged tract, unit and head identifiable: legal descriptions, serials, classes and counts.
Re-mark land each quarter on recent arm's-length sales, by soil band; send thin-support tracts to a review appraiser.
Match machinery to auction and dealer results by serial; alert on any pledged serial sold.
Price livestock by class and weight; pass a head drop only when a sale meets a deposit.
Keep buyer notices, filings and insurance assignments current for each crop year.
Recompute loan-to-value by loan and relationship; order appraisals where loans cross their lines; report to the board by loan.
Readiness: score 0–2 on eight questions: 0–6 explore · 7–11 pilot · 12–16 implement.
As of October 2026: 19 central filing states (2016 count), Oklahoma's move to the county clerk approved March 16, 2026 · bank appraisal threshold $500,000, Farm Credit $250,000 · FSA ages 12 months chattel, 18 months real estate · SR 26-2 replaced SR 11-7 on April 17, 2026 · the 2024 valuation-model rule covers credit decisions on home mortgages and leaves portfolio monitoring out.
14 terms
Loan-to-value
Loan balance divided by collateral value.
Coverage
Collateral value divided by exposure; 1.20x means $1.20 for every $1.00 owed.
Watch line
A loan-to-value at which a loan goes on the watch list.
Re-mark
Re-valuing collateral on current evidence between appraisals.
Evaluation
A lender's documented estimate of market value, used below the appraisal thresholds and for monitoring.
Arm's-length sale
A sale between unrelated, willing parties; family sales are set aside.
CSR2
Iowa's Corn Suitability Rating 2, a soil productivity index; higher is better land.
Farm products
Crops, livestock, supplies and their unprocessed products held by a farmer.
Direct notice
A lender's written notice to a buyer of farm products, good for a year.
Effective financing statement
A filing in a central filing state that warns registered buyers.
Assignment of indemnity
The crop insurer's form that pays a creditor jointly, one crop year at a time.
Agricultural lien
A lien the law gives a landlord, supplier or vet, which can outrank a lender.
Conversion
Selling or using pledged property against the lender's rights.
Chattel
Movable collateral: machinery, livestock, crops.
25 · Sources
Sources
Accessed October 2026. Regulatory status statements are as of October 2026.
OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC, OTS and NCUA, "Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines", December 2, 2010 (FDIC FIL-82-2010). fdic.gov
7 CFR part 762, Guaranteed Farm Loans, §§ 762.126 (security), 762.127 (appraisals), 762.140 (general servicing), 762.141 (reporting), 762.142 (servicing related to collateral), Code of Federal Regulations, 2026 edition. govinfo.gov
7 U.S.C. § 1631, "Protection for purchasers of farm products" (Food Security Act of 1985, § 1324), current text. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. law.cornell.edu
7 CFR 457.8, Common Crop Insurance Policy, Basic Provisions, §§ 28 (Transfer of Coverage and Right to Indemnity) and 29 (Assignment of Indemnity), Code of Federal Regulations, 2026 edition. govinfo.gov
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, "Land Values 2026 Summary", July 2026. nass.usda.gov
E. Kepner and D. Oppedahl, "Second Quarter Midwest Farmland Values Unchanged", AgLetter No. 2013, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, August 2026. chicagofed.org
J. Vorman, "25 percent of farmers sold loan collateral without permission", Center for Public Integrity, August 23, 2010, reporting USDA OIG audit 03601-18-CH of FSA direct farm loans. publicintegrity.org
USDA Economic Research Service, "Assets, Debt, and Wealth", updated September 3, 2026. ers.usda.gov
12 CFR 614.4260, 614.4265 and 614.4266, Farm Credit Administration collateral evaluation requirements, Code of Federal Regulations, 2025 edition (latest on GovInfo). govinfo.gov
OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC, NCUA, CFPB and FHFA, "Quality Control Standards for Automated Valuation Models", final rule, 89 FR 64538, August 7, 2024, effective October 1, 2025. federalregister.gov
Agricultural Marketing Service, "Amendment to Certification of Oklahoma's Central Filing System", Doc. No. AMS-FTPP-25-0453, 91 FR 12550, March 16, 2026. federalregister.gov
Oklahoma Legislature, Enrolled Senate Bill No. 988 (2025), transferring the farm products central filing system from the Secretary of State to the Oklahoma County Clerk, effective 180 days after USDA certification; became law without the Governor's signature May 28, 2025. oklegislature.gov
Federal Reserve SR 26-2, OCC Bulletin 2026-13 and FDIC FIL-15-2026, "Revised Guidance on Model Risk Management", April 17, 2026. federalreserve.gov
Uniform Commercial Code, Article 9, §§ 9-102 (definitions), 9-315 (proceeds), 9-320 (buyers of goods) and 9-334 (crops), model text. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. law.cornell.edu
12 CFR 34.42 and 34.43, OCC appraisal requirements (the FDIC and Federal Reserve rules match), Code of Federal Regulations, 2026 edition. govinfo.gov
18 U.S.C. § 658, "Property mortgaged or pledged to farm credit agencies". Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. law.cornell.edu
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, "Request for Extension and Revision of a Currently Approved Information Collection Under the Clear Title Program", 81 FR 59597, August 30, 2016 (FR Doc. 2016-20730: "Nineteen states have certified central filing systems currently"). govinfo.gov
Washington State Legislature, House Concurrent Resolution 4408 (2001), naming the 19 states with USDA-certified central filing systems. leg.wa.gov
R. Wright, N. Buda and S. Andersen (Baird Holm LLP), "Protection for Lenders: The Effective Financing Statement and Key Court Decisions", Nebraska Banker, August 17, 2020. nebraska-banker.thenewslinkgroup.org
K. A. Tidgren, "Iowa Agricultural Liens: A Legal Review", Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation, Iowa State University, September 30, 2016. calt.iastate.edu
D. Oppedahl and E. Kepner, "First Quarter Midwest Farmland Values Up Some from a Year Ago", AgLetter No. 2012, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, May 2026. chicagofed.org
T. Kreitman, "Sharp Growth in Tenth District Ranchland Values", Tenth District Agricultural Credit Survey, Q1 2026, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, May 14, 2026. kansascityfed.org
T. Kreitman, "Steady Tightening of Agricultural Credit Conditions Persists", Tenth District Agricultural Credit Survey, Q2 2026, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, August 14, 2026. kansascityfed.org
Iowa State University, "Iowa Farmland Values Inch Up in Market Readjustment" (2025 ISU Land Value Survey), news release, December 9, 2025. farmland.card.iastate.edu
T. Kuethe and M. Langemeier, "Purdue Farmland Values and Cash Rent Survey Results", Purdue Agricultural Economics Report, August 17, 2026. ag.purdue.edu
G. Mashange, "The U.S. Farm Machinery and Equipment Market: Sales, Inventories, and Tariff Headwinds", farmdoc daily (16):33, University of Illinois, February 27, 2026 (AEM unit sales; Sandhills used-equipment values). farmdocdaily.illinois.edu
USDA Economic Research Service, "Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook: October 2026", LDP-M-388, October 16, 2026. ers.usda.gov
T. Kreitman, "Growth in Farm Lending Activity Persists", Agricultural Finance Update (National Survey of Terms of Lending to Farmers), Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, April 8, 2026. kansascityfed.org
FDIC Office of Inspector General, "Rancher Sentenced for Running $244 Million 'Ghost Cattle' Scam" (U.S. Department of Justice release), October 5, 2022. fdicoig.gov
USDA Risk Management Agency, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, "Summary of Business Report for 2023 thru 2026", as of October 26, 2026. rma.usda.gov
USDA Economic Research Service, "Farm Sector Income Forecast" and "Highlights From the Farm Income Forecast", September 3, 2026. ers.usda.gov
DTN/Progressive Farmer, "Iowa Hog Farmer Sentenced to 13 Years for $1.7M Fraud", April 13, 2026, reporting the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Iowa. dtnpf.com
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, "Bankruptcy Filings Increase 11.4 Percent", October 22, 2026. uscourts.gov
USDA Economic Research Service, "Debt Use by U.S. Farm Businesses, 2012–2021", EIB-273, June 26, 2024. ers.usda.gov
O*NET OnLine (U.S. Department of Labor), "Credit Analysts, 13-2041.00": wages, United States median $40.15 an hour, $83,510 a year (Bureau of Labor Statistics 2025 wage data). onetonline.org
Next step
See it on your own pledged collateral.
Explore the solution, or bring a sample of your loan book, your security agreement schedules and your collateral policy, and we will re-mark it with you, every value linked to its evidence.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and cookieless, anonymised analytics to understand how it's used. "Accept all" also turns on Google Analytics, which sets cookies. Privacy policy