Validation Document Review demo
Four AI reviewers for GxP, data integrity, test design and writing each return their own redlines, agreement is marked where they concur, and every reviewer's accuracy against your past human reviews is on screen. Advisory only. 1:14
What the demo shows
A GxP validation QC solution for validation teams that reviews documents and returns redlines.
A protocol or report goes to a panel of four reviewers that read it independently: a GxP reviewer (procedures, templates and standards in force on the test date), a data integrity reviewer (raw data, corrections, records, calibration), a test design reviewer (requirements, acceptance criteria, samples, statistics) and a writing reviewer (terms, numbering, cross-references). Each fills its own column with located redlines; where two or more raise the same defect the panel marks the agreement. Every reviewer is scored nightly against 36 past reviews your quality reviewers signed off, so its recall and false-alarm rate sit at the top of its column. The quality reviewer accepts, edits or dismisses each finding; the panel never approves.
Transcript
- Validation Document Review marks up-validation protocols and reports for GxP quality teams.
- By hand it takes hours, and two reviewers rarely find the same things.
- Sam Patel submits an eight-page protocol for a marker-band vision system.
- Four reviewers read it on their own.
- GxP, data integrity, test design and writing.
- Then two of them, separately, flag the same gap.
- no criterion for distinct categories.
- Each column shows that reviewers' accuracy against 36 of your past human reviews.
- Each finding carries its evidence.
- SOP QA 0112 requires that criterion before anyone measures.
- Dana accepts. The redline protocol goes back to Sam in minutes, not hours.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens, and governance on one platform.
Transcribed from the film’s narration. Captions are on the player.