Teacher Evaluation Evidence Review demo
Tags observation notes and artifacts to the rubric and drafts feedback, for principals 1:34
What the demo shows
Tags observation notes and artifacts to the rubric and drafts feedback, for principals
Seven agents do the reading around every observation: they bring in the script and the teacher's artifacts with student names masked, tag every line to the district rubric, propose a level only where the evidence matches the rubric's own wording, draft cited feedback in the evaluator's voice, run the bargaining agreement's clocks in school days, flag rating drift across caseloads, and keep every improvement plan file grievance-ready. The evaluator decides every tag and rating and signs; a second evaluator checks procedure before release; the teacher adds evidence and responds; human resources approves every plan.
Transcript
- Teacher Evaluation Evidence Review tags observation notes and artifacts to the rubric and drafts feedback, for principals.
- A write-up takes two to three hours; one missed date can void it.
- Every line of this math script is tagged to the rubric.
- Empty components say so; levels appear only where the rubric's wording fits.
- The Due-Process agent warns: Jonathan's feedback is due in two school days.
- Simone removes one overreaching tag; the draft drops its sentence.
- Every sentence cites its line; she decides each rating and signs.
- The principal checks procedure, not ratings, and releases it.
- Jonathan adds evidence and a response the same day.
- The Drift agent flags lower afternoon ratings; she plans a co-observation.
- Every step is logged; exports mask student names.
- Feedback written in days, not weeks, with every rating tied to the evidence.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.