Sanctions Alert Review demo
The member and the list entry face to face, every identifier cited, closures re-reviewed blind and true matches blocked on two signatures 1:34
What the demo shows
Sanctions analysts clear name-screening hits identifier by identifier and escalate true hits
Agents put the member and the list entry face to face, one identifier per row, each value cited to the member record or the list entry and its version, run OFAC's six evaluation steps and write a one-sentence verdict. A duplicate guard reuses an earlier closure only on an identical entry version; OFAC updates are re-screened the evening they are published. The analyst closes or escalates, a QA reviewer re-reviews a sample blind, the OFAC Officer decides every potential match, and a block needs a second officer before funds move and the 10-business-day report clock starts.
Transcript
- Sanctions Alert Review helps sanctions analysts clear name-screening hits, identifier by identifier.
- Ninety to ninety-five percent of hits are commonly false; one miss is a violation.
- Yesterday OFAC listed a Maria Elena Castillo; a Norrell member shares the name.
- Member and list entry face each other, each identifier cited.
- She was born in 1988 in Maine; the listed person, 1961, Mexico.
- The verdict: two of five conflict; not the listed person.
- Analyst Jordan Ellery agrees and closes it; it's drawn for QA.
- Reviewer Grant Okafor re-checks it blind, then agrees.
- The duplicate guard reopens a closure whose list entry changed.
- A true match goes to the OFAC Officer to block; a deputy approves.
- Every step is logged, kept ten years, ready for the examiner.
- Payment hits clear in six minutes; matches reach the officer within the hour.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.