Regular and Substantive Interaction Monitoring demo
Online learning offices check courses for regular, substantive instructor interaction 1:32
What the demo shows
Online learning offices check courses for regular, substantive instructor interaction
Seven agents read every instructor interaction in every online section each night. The Classifier labels each one against the five federal elements of substantive interaction and cites the element it meets, or why it meets none; a Skeptic on a different model re-checks a random 5% and every close call. The Regularity agent measures gaps against each syllabus’s posted schedule. When a gap passes seven days, the Nudge agent drafts a private, supportive note that the compliance director approves; it never goes to a chair. Escalation needs the dean, a status change needs two signatures, and every section keeps a dated record for reviewers.
Transcript
- Regular and Substantive Interaction Monitoring shows which online courses have real instructor interaction.
- Without it, a course counts as correspondence; one audit asked for 712.7 million dollars back.
- Each row is a section. Solid beats teach; hollow ones are automated, or “Nice work!”.
- Accounting 101, section 3: forty-six hollow messages, a sixteen-day gap.
- The Classifier labels every post; a Skeptic re-checks the close calls.
- The Nudge agent drafts a private, supportive note, not a report to his chair.
- Teresa, the compliance director, edits it and sends it at 8:12.
- By Thursday, Paul gave real feedback on 31 submissions; week eight turns solid.
- The dean releases the section’s dated record at 4:40.
- Non-compliance takes two signatures: the director’s and the dean’s.
- Twenty-seven of thirty-six nudged sections closed their gap in three days.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.