Payment Investigations demo
Payment ops work wire inquiries, cancellations and non-receipt claims as cases, with replies 1:33
What the demo shows
Payment ops work wire inquiries, cancellations and non-receipt claims as cases, with replies
A Reading agent reads each request, structured ISO 20022 or free text, and extracts the case with a confidence on every field. A Research agent finds the payment in the payments hub, the SWIFT tracker, the Fedwire gateway, the core banking system and the general ledger, citing each record. A Rules agent decides what the facts mean under UCC Article 4A, Regulation J and the correspondent agreement, and marks any reply that admits liability, moves money or pays a claim. A Drafting agent writes the camt.111, camt.029 and customer notices, a Correction agent drafts the entries, a Deadline agent watches every client deadline, and a Trends agent summarizes repeat issues by correspondent. The analyst sends routine replies; a team lead approves the rest on the same thread.
Transcript
- Payment Investigations works wire inquiries, cancellations and non-receipt claims as cases.
- Corvane works 3,400 a month; a non-receipt claim took three days.
- Halberd Bank asks why 48,250 dollars never reached its customer.
- Agents trace it in the payments hub, tracker and ledger, each step cited.
- It went to a similarly named account; the name check scored 0.81.
- The drafting agent writes the correction and both replies.
- Dana asks why not return the funds; the agent cites the agreement.
- It admits a mistake and moves money, so it needs a checker.
- Team lead Marcus Oyelaran approves on the same evidence, and the case closes.
- Halberd's six mismatches reach the relationship manager in a drafted note.
- Every action is on the audit trail, with export packs for examiners.
- The result: closed in forty minutes, every liability reply signed twice.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.