Reads the claims as written and draws the dependency tree, marking forward and cross-kind references.
- Never renumbers or reorders claims
Patent proofreading software that reads a draft the way an examiner will: the claims as the tree they form, each numeral against the drawings, each claim term against the description.
See each check, from the claim tree to the signature ↓Before filing, the senior paralegal proofs the draft by hand: a printout, a highlighter and a claim tree sketched on a pad. Each claim is read against its parents, each reference numeral ticked against the drawing sheets, and each claim term searched for in the description.
The errors that slip are structural. A term introduced in one claim and used with a definite article in a claim on another branch looks fine to a reader going in order, because the earlier claim was just read. A dependent claim that points to a later claim, or a medium claim hanging off a method claim, hides the same way. Each miss becomes an indefiniteness rejection, a certificate of correction after grant, or a scope problem no certificate can fix.
Built forPatent attorneysPatent agentsProofreading paralegalsIP practice chairs
A claim can read fine in order and still borrow a term from another branch, and the examiner reads the tree.
Checked on paper today
Built-in controls
A ready-to-file check signed by the attorney, and a Word file that carries only the accepted fixes.
From the first agent pass to the attorney’s signature, each check says who may act on what it finds.
How it works
Senior patent paralegalKnows which of the six drafts on the desk to open first, and where its errors sit, before turning a page of the printout.
How it works
Senior patent paralegalGets the wrong-branch errors she could only find by sketching the tree on a pad, each with its claim, its branch and the reason.
How it works
Patent attorneySees each broken dependency with its likely parent and the term that points to it, and settles it before an examiner objects.
How it works
Patent agentSees exactly which numeral was reused or mistyped, and in which paragraph, while the fix is still one word in the text.
How it works
Senior patent paralegalStops ticking numerals against four printed sheets, and sends the drafter a marked correction in place of an email describing it.
How it works
Senior patent paralegalClears twelve clerical fixes in one sitting and sends on only the five decisions that need a lawyer.
How it works
Patent attorneyChooses between amending claim 13 to the description’s own words and adding support, with the cited paragraph on screen.
How it works
Patent agentOpens one file showing each change against the draft they wrote, with the claim and the decision behind it.
How it works
Patent attorneySigns a check that traces item by item to the decisions behind it, on the day the draft reaches the desk.
The agents’ run and the decisions on this draft, beside our estimate of the same proof done on paper.
| Who | What they did | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Agents | Read 26 claims, 58 paragraphs and 4 sheets; found 15 issues and 2 warnings | 3 min 12 s |
| Senior patent paralegal | Accepted the 12 clerical fixes | 26 min |
| Patent attorney | Decided the 3 scope fixes and the 2 warnings, then signed | 12 min |
| On paper | The same proof with a printout and a highlighter | about 4 hours |
| What came out | 14 tracked changes in the Word file, 2 drawing corrections for the drafter | Same day |
estimatedOur estimate.
Six more screens: a citation, a drawing sheet, the attorney’s queue, a kept warning, the record and the settings.
Each reads one thing and proposes. The paralegal and the attorney decide.
Reads the claims as written and draws the dependency tree, marking forward and cross-kind references.
Checks each definite term against its own claim and the claims above it on its branch.
Flags a claim that depends on a later claim, on another kind of claim or on itself, and proposes the likely parent.
Reads the drawings and the text and matches each reference numeral and element name, both ways.
Looks in the description for each claim term, word for word or in close wording, and cites the paragraph.
Writes the marked-up Word document from the accepted fixes, as tracked changes in the decider’s name.
Four roles around the proofreading desk, and what each one answers for.
Patent proofreading software reads a draft application before filing the way an examiner will. This one draws the claims as the tree they really form, checks each antecedent on its own branch, matches reference numerals between the text and the drawings, and finds support for each claim term, with one cited fix per issue.
It checks each term against its own claim and the claims above it on its branch, and nothing else. A term introduced on another branch does not count, so a claim that borrows it shows on the tree with a dashed link to where the term really lives.
No. Agents propose and people decide. The marked-up Word document is a separate copy carrying only the accepted fixes as tracked changes, and drawing corrections go to the drafter as a marked sheet.
The attorney of record. Dependencies, support gaps and warnings go to the attorney, and the firm’s settings say which fixes count as clerical. The attorney also signs the ready-to-file check.
Yes. An amendment goes through the same checks, and only the amended claims and their branches are checked again. Anything that looks like new matter goes to the attorney.
No. Drafts stay inside the firm’s workspace, and the proof record, from the first agent run to the attorney’s signature, is filed with the matter.
A cited clearance opinion with the risky marks ranked, the same day.
1-min filmTrademark WatchEvery copycat filing scored, explained and caught inside the opposition window, with the opposition already drafted.
1-min filmIP Due DiligenceA cited IP schedule, with every title gap, lien and lapsed asset flagged before signing.
1-min filmA draft that drew an indefiniteness rejection is the best test: we’ll show you its claim tree, its numerals and its support table.