Online Course Quality Review demo

Course designers review online course shells against a quality rubric and get drafted fixes 1:32

What the demo shows

Course designers review online course shells against a quality rubric and get drafted fixes

A Walker agent takes the course as a student would: it opens every page, follows every link, starts every quiz in preview and times every video. An Alignment agent maps objectives to assessments and activities and flags objectives nothing assesses. An Access agent sends captions, untagged files and contrast to the remediation queue on day one. A Fixer drafts each change with the rubric language quoted, such as a measurable objective aligned to a named quiz item. The instructional designer prepares, a faculty peer accepts, edits or rejects each fix, the faculty author accepts every change to their course, and the Director signs the certification after the peer.

Transcript

  1. Online Course Quality Review checks online courses against a rubric, with fixes drafted by agents.
  2. An outside review can take twenty weeks; NURS 6200 launches January 11.
  3. The Walker took the course as a student: all 296 items.
  4. It found three broken links and a 41-minute video with no captions.
  5. The Alignment agent found Module 4's objective is never assessed.
  6. Pins on the course map mark failing standards, the rubric beside each fix.
  7. The Fixer proposes: calculate a renal dose adjustment, aligned to Quiz 4, item 7.
  8. Peer reviewer Dr. Simone Achterberg accepts it, and 11 of 14 fixes in all.
  9. The author accepts each change before it reaches her course.
  10. The peer recommends, the Director signs, and every step is audited.
  11. NURS 6200 is certified at 92 of 101, every essential standard met.
  12. Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.

The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.