Non-Compete Enforceability Analysis video
Every restrictive clause read, every employee matched to the law where they work, and every failing clause rewritten to the narrowest form that state allows. 1:18
What the film shows
Checks each restrictive covenant against the employee's state law, for employment counsel
Agents pull every restrictive clause from every version, match each employee to the law of the state they work in and this year's pay floor, and rule on each clause with the cite. They rewrite each failing clause to the narrowest lawful form, draft the notices and flag departures worth enforcing; counsel accepts each rewrite and signs the memo.
Transcript
- Non-Compete Enforceability Analysis checks each restrictive covenant against the employee's state law, for employment counsel.
- With the federal rule gone, each state's own law now decides.
- Larkspur Vane holds four hundred twelve agreements in six versions, across thirty-one states.
- Agents pull every clause and match each employee to their work state and pay.
- Each state rule is cited, with its pay floor and the date it changes.
- Minnesota glows red: fourteen employees under its 2023 ban.
- The drafter converts it to the narrowest non-solicit Minnesota allows.
- Cordelia accepts it for all fourteen, with fresh pay behind it.
- Thirty-eight void, ninety-seven to reform, every ruling cited, and the memo signed on day nine.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.