Mass Tort Case Vetting video
Every claimant read against the settlement's own criteria, every pass, fail or missing cited to the page, and every tier decided by a named person. 1:20
What the film shows
Checks each mass tort claimant's records for proof of use and proof of injury against criteria
Agents read every pharmacy and medical record, check each claimant against the settlement's seven criteria with the page that proves or breaks each one, flag disqualifiers, draft one request per pharmacy for what is missing, and propose a tier. A nurse confirms the injury; the Director approves every tier and every reject, with a reason.
Transcript
- Mass Tort Case Vetting checks each claimant's records for proof of use and injury.
- By 2024, four in ten signed mass tort cases fell out unpaid.
- Ironbark Fallow has 4,812 claimants, each checked against seven settlement criteria.
- Every cell is a cited pass, fail or missing; one click shows the page.
- Row 214 fills in: a 2016 pharmacy record, injury on page 88, six years apart, so Tier 1.
- A nurse confirms the injury, and the director approves the tier.
- Missing proof becomes one request per pharmacy, sent when the paralegal approves.
- Five hundred thirty-two fail latency; each rejection needs the director's reason.
- Ninety days early, every claimant is sorted, and every criterion is cited.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.