IRB Protocol Pre-Review demo
IRB staff screen protocols, parental permission and consent forms for Common Rule elements 1:32
What the demo shows
IRB staff screen protocols, parental permission and consent forms for Common Rule elements
Seven agents do the reading: they check each submission is complete for its review path, tie every required consent element to the paragraph that meets it, compare the protocol with every form, read translated forms back into English and measure reading level, draft the return, on resubmission show only what changed, and build a sealed audit pack on request. The analyst completes the pre-review, a second analyst checks every return, the investigator fixes each change with the agent, and a designated reviewer, the chair or the board makes every determination. Agents never decide exemption or approval.
Transcript
- IRB Protocol Pre-Review checks protocols and consent forms against the Common Rule.
- Of 5,239 consent forms, 91 percent read above eighth grade.
- Protocol 2026-0418 studies reading with children in six schools.
- Above the form: grade 12.4 against eight, and two surveys promised where the protocol has three.
- The Consent agent ties each required element to its paragraph.
- On the assent script, the key-points socket is open.
- In Spanish, opting out reads as missing the reading class.
- Jae-won settles one uncertain element herself, and sends three cited fixes for a second check.
- Checked on day one, they reach the investigator, who fixes each with the agent and resubmits.
- Agents never decide: the reviewer determines, with a reason, all logged.
- Pre-review in a day, not nine, with consent gaps closed.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.