Instructional Materials Adoption Review demo
Scores curriculum bids against standards and rubrics, page cited, for adoption committees 1:33
What the demo shows
Scores curriculum bids against standards and rubrics, page cited, for adoption committees
Seven agents prepare a curriculum adoption so the committee spends its time on judgment. They pull every bid from the procurement system, read every sample page, map lessons to each state standard, draft page-cited evidence for every rubric criterion, and test each publisher's correlation and price sheet against the books. Members score on their own first; the Spread agent then shows where their scores split and what each side cited, without ever suggesting a score. The chair records each committee score, the curriculum director verifies the lock, the chief academic officer recommends, the board approves and purchasing awards, with disclosures checked against the bidder contact log throughout.
Transcript
- Instructional Materials Adoption Review scores curriculum bids against standards and rubrics, page cited, for adoption committees.
- Seven K–5 math bids run 38,000 pages; nobody can check every claim by hand.
- Members score alone; the Spread agent marks where scores split.
- Bid D claims all of grade 4 fractions; its alignment scores run one to four.
- Claim Check found fraction addition only in a supplement outside the price.
- It cites correlation page 12 and price sheet line 18: $620,100 more.
- Agents show what each side cited, never a score.
- Chair Howard Penhallow-Ruiz records the committee's score of 2, with the reason.
- The note enters the board packet; the director verifies every locked score.
- Disclosures are checked against the contact log; every decision is audited.
- Result: 1,100 claims checked against the pages; Bid D now ranks last.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.