Inbound Freight Compliance demo

A routing-guide case laid out from both sides, argued from the supplier's side by an agent, before anyone charges it. 1:27

What the demo shows

Enforce your routing guide on suppliers' inbound shipments and charge back violations

Agents line up the purchase order, the routing request, the routing desk’s reply, the pickup and the EDI 856, re-rate the shipment on the routed carrier and draft each charge, such as extra freight, the routing-guide fee and a late ship notice. A challenger argues the supplier’s side first, catching the agents’ own errors and the buyer’s own misses, such as a routing reply later than the desk promises. The analyst decides each charge line with a reason, the manager opens the evidence and signs, and the supplier answers in fixed fields while any note goes to a person. Accounts payable applies the deduction, and the routing desk’s own misses are counted.

Transcript

  1. Inbound Freight Compliance charges back routing guide violations. One retailer charges two hundred fifty dollars each; weak charges get disputed.
  2. Dana starts the agents, and mid-run adds a ninety-day check.
  3. Agents read each record, handing off by name.
  4. The Supplier's Rebuttal argues their side: a wrong fuel week in our math, and our late reply.
  5. Dana drops the routing charge and writes why in her own words, then keeps the hundred-dollar ship notice fee, with a written reason too.
  6. Wade, the manager, reads the desk's email, sent after the truck had left, and only then signs the drop.
  7. Then he reads the ship notice before signing the fee. Nobody signs their own decision.
  8. To the portal; a labeled sample reply returns in fixed fields.
  9. Its note waits for a person before any deduction.
  10. One hundred dollars to accounts payable, seven hundred twenty-two dropped, the desk's miss counted.
  11. Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.

The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.