In-Line Inspection Report Review demo
Vendor caveats in an inspection report applied to the listing rows they change, so integrity engineers plan digs before the discovery clock runs out. 1:24
What the demo shows
Checks inspection reports against past runs, digs and repair clocks for integrity engineers.
Agents check the vendor's files, align three runs, estimate growth, read the written report page by page, and compare every dig with the tool. They propose a dig or monitoring from the customer's procedure. An integrity engineer decides after opening the evidence, a manager countersigns after opening the same evidence, a VP rules any dispute or dropped dig, and failure pressure stays in the engineer's own tool.
Transcript
- In-Line Inspection Report Review checks reports against runs, digs, and repair clocks.
- Four integrity engineers, 180 days after a run to learn enough to judge each condition.
- Three runs, joint by joint, growth rising.
- Page 2-12. The tool ran too fast, mile 58 to 64.
- The listing never says.
- The agent pulls those 37.
- 26, now 44%. A nearby dig found 38 for years after a 24 call.
- Active corrosion. Ja opens the evidence, moves it to a dig.
- Manager Evo opens the same page, the same dig sheet, and the same calc record, and only then can he countersign.
- Every no-dig decision keeps its evidence.
- 83 features re-read, 7 proposed digs added, 1 signed.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens, and governance on one platform.
Transcribed from the film’s narration. Captions are on the player.