IEP Compliance Review demo

What the demo shows

Checks each draft IEP for required content, measurable goals and dates, for special ed staff

Seven agents read every draft IEP before its meeting and check each other. Among them, one tests each required item of 34 CFR 300.320 and the state form; one parses every annual goal into condition, behavior, criterion and timeframe and drafts a replacement from the present levels; one traces each need to a goal and a service; one watches the annual, reevaluation, notice and progress-report clocks. Where two agents disagree the finding is contested and goes to a person. The case manager decides with a reason code, and a compliance coordinator second-reads every draft with an open finding before the meeting notice goes out.

Transcript

1. 0:00IEP Compliance Review checks every draft IEP before the meeting, for school districts.
2. 0:09Last year districts answered nearly ten thousand state complaints.
3. 0:16Mateo's draft, clocks on top: meeting June eleventh, notice due June first.
4. 0:24Four agents read it first; every finding cites its rule and page.
5. 0:30Goal one has no criterion and no timeframe. Both chips sit empty.
6. 0:36Page three: sixty-two words a minute, against a benchmark of a hundred twelve.
7. 0:43So the agent writes the goal from that number, cited to the page.
8. 0:49Another agent finds written expression named as a need, with no goal. Renata accepts both, with a reason code.
9. 0:59Where agents disagree, nothing defaults — a named coordinator decides.
10. 1:08Dana second-reads and signs; the IEP system gets tracked suggestions, never an edit.
11. 1:15Every draft read in three minutes, not a sample after the meeting.
12. 1:21Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.

The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.