SystemContracts, Pricing & Tenders

Equipment Placement Commitment and True-Up Tracking

Equipment placement agreement tracking for device makers that draws every placement's pace, reads the amendments and exhibits that change the year-end shortfall, and works out each remedy the agreement names before two people sign.

Follow one lab's $89,000 shortfall down to $22,000 ↓
Watch with transcript →
The problem

The commitment sits in the agreement; the true-up comes from a purchases file

Analyzers go into hospital labs at little or no upfront cost, paid for through a yearly reagent commitment. At year end a contract analyst compares the commitment keyed into the ERP with the purchases shipped to one ship-to, one agreement at a time.

The clauses that change the sum sit in amendments and exhibits nobody rereads: a sister lab added as an affiliated site, a ramp year, a second analyzer that raised the commitment, downtime and supply exclusions. Over-bill and a lab director disputes it; under-bill and the equipment was given away.

Built forContract managersFinance credit managersContract analystsCapital sales managers

The Problem Today

Placed analyzers are paid for through reagent commitments, but year-end true-ups come from a purchases file.

12,000
placement reviews a year for one big maker of devices our estimate

Checked by hand at each year end

  • Agreement
  • Amendments
  • Purchases
  • Ship-tos
  • Sister labs go uncountedPurchases at an affiliated site never reach the sum
  • Amendments stay unreadA raised commitment is never keyed into the record

The Solution

  1. Draw each agreement's pacePace needed, purchases and forecast for each placement, side by side
  2. Read what changes the sumSister sites, ramp years, amendments, downtime and credits, each cited
  3. Work out each remedyInvoice, price change, term extension or equipment purchase, by clause
  4. Two people sign, then sendThe contract manager prepares; finance opens each passage and signs

Built-in controls

  • Agents never send, bill or waive
  • Signers open each passage before they sign
  • Customer text uses compliance-approved wording

What You Get

Each lab is billed what its signed agreement says, and sees every purchase and clause behind the number.

$336,000
a year of analyst time at a large maker our estimate
  • Fewer disputes with labsEach statement shows the purchases and clauses behind it
  • Shortfalls seen before year endLanes behind pace reach capital sales while there is time
  • Evidence for each true-upWho prepared, who signed and what each one opened
One closed year, one sister lab

An equipment placement agreement for two chemistry analyzers, year 2 closed

September purchases loaded at 07:02 for 412 placement agreements and 670 analyzers. One core lab's year has just closed, and from its own purchases it looks $89,000 short.

demoLabs, analyzers, agreements and people are made up, and so are the dollars: sample data throughout.

  1. 0109:40

    412 lanes: 19 closed short, 52 behind pace, 29 with clauses unread

    Contract manager

    Each lane is a small chart of purchases against the pace the commitment needs, month by month. Selected, the core lab's lane shows a $480,000 commitment, $391,000 bought and $89,000 short. A yellow note says that figure comes from the purchases file alone: the agents have not yet read the clauses that can change it.

  2. 0209:40

    Amendment 1 replaced Exhibit B, and a sister lab counts toward the commitment

    Contract manager

    She asks the agents to read the clauses that change the sum. The agreement reader takes the commitment, the ramp year and the affiliated sites clause from the base agreement, then finds the amendment that added the sister hospital's lab. The purchase matcher finds $67,000 of chemistry reagents bought there and counted under no other agreement.

  3. 0309:41

    $89,000 short from the file, $22,000 after the clauses, four remedies priced

    Contract manager

    The true-up is laid out as a ladder, each line opening its passage or its purchase lines. Downtime of 31 hours stayed under the 48 the clause needs, the ramp ended with year 1, and the sister lab's immunoassay reagents fall outside the schedule. On the right, each remedy the agreement allows, worked out from its clause.

  4. 0409:41

    She opens the amendment herself before the prepare button counts

    Contract manager

    Each line that changed the sum has to be read by the person who prepares. The amendment opens at its one page: the sister hospital's laboratory, with its ship-to account, replaces the old exhibit. The opening is recorded in her name with the time.

  5. 0509:42

    Shortfall invoice for $22,000 prepared, and it waits for finance

    Contract manager

    She picks the shortfall invoice over a 4.6% price rise, a one-month term extension or an equipment purchase at $201,333, and signs as preparer. A waiver would need a written reason, the finance credit manager, commercial compliance and the finance director. The true-up now waits for the finance credit manager.

  6. 0609:44

    Finance opens the purchase lines: $391,000 here, $67,000 at the sister lab

    Finance credit manager

    Signed in as himself, he opens the month-by-month purchase lines for the core lab, the sister lab's chemistry and the immunoassay reagents that do not count. His signature stays locked until he has read the amendment too. $22,000 is under the $100,000 above which the finance director signs as well.

  7. 0709:47

    Two signatures in place, the statement goes in approved wording only

    Contract manager

    The statement to the laboratory director shows the commitment, the qualified purchases and why the sister lab counts, with every month by site. Any sentence she typed would wait for commercial compliance. Both signatures are in place and the wording is approved, so the send button is live.

  8. 0809:48

    Clauses read for all closed years: the short list now sums $581,036

    Contract manager

    She has the agents read the clauses for the other closed years. From the purchases file alone the 19 short years would be billed $837,435; after the clauses they owe $581,036, and the clauses changed the sum on 8 of them. Her lane now reads sent, with the lab's dispute window open.

How the core lab's shortfall fell from $89,000 to $22,000

Agreement year 2, two analyzers, one affiliated site.

Annual commitment, section 3.1$480,000
Qualified purchases at the core lab, net of 2 credits1,214 invoice lines− $391,000
Short from the purchases file alone$89,000
Sister lab's chemistry reagents, counted under the amendment− $67,000
Shortfall to true up$22,000

demoSample data, from the working solution.

The four remedies the agreement offers for a $22,000 shortfall

Each worked from its own clause. The contract manager chooses; nothing is waived without a reason and three approvals.

RemedyClauseWorked out
Shortfall invoice9.1$22,000
Price adjustment next year, capped at 6%9.2+4.6%
Term extension, whole months9.31 month
Equipment purchase at the exhibit value9.4$201,333
Waive this yearNone$0, with a written reason

demoSample data, from the working solution. Notice is due within 60 days of the year end, and the lab may dispute within 30 days of it.

Around the true-up

The queues, the agreements and the pace behind each placement

What the contract manager, finance and capital sales work from between year ends.

The finance queueAnother lab's true-up, where a signed uptime statement took $7,644 off the sum. He can sign only after opening each source.
Closed yearsEach closed year with the purchases-file figure beside the figure after clauses, who holds it and when notice is due.
Behind pace, by quarter52 lanes forecast short, by the quarter their year ends. Capital sales sends a pace note in approved wording before the year closes.
412 agreementsThe library with each commitment and term, new agreements at intake, and ship-tos the matcher would not map by itself.
What the reader tookCommitment, ramp, affiliated sites, remedies, exclusions and notice, each cited to its page and checked by the contract analyst at intake.
Statements and wordingWaivers and typed sentences waiting for commercial compliance, and each statement's state and wording.

demoSample data, from the working solution.

Prepared by contract, signed by finance, and a third name above $100,000

Nobody signs what they prepared.

Contract manager
Sees
Closed short years, the clause lines and the remedies
Signs
Chooses the remedy and prepares the true-up
Finance credit manager
Sees
The purchase lines and each changed passage
Signs
Approves true-ups for invoicing
Finance director
Sees
True-ups over the threshold, waivers and equipment purchases
Signs
Adds the second finance signature
Contract analyst
Sees
Each field the reader took at intake, and unmatched ship-tos
Signs
Checks fields and maps ship-tos
Commercial compliance reviewer
Sees
Every typed sentence and every waiver
Signs
Approves or returns text before it reaches a lab
Capital sales manager
Sees
Lanes behind pace before the year ends
Signs
Sends pace notes; recommends, never signs

demoSample data, from the working solution.

Who reads the agreements

Seven agents pace, read and price; none of them bills a lab

They read the paper and work out the sums. People choose, sign and send.

Agreement reader

Reads agreements, amendments and exhibits: commitment, ramp, sites, exclusions, remedies, notice.

  • Stops at a missing page rather than guess
  • Never changes a contract record
Purchase matcher

Sums invoice lines by ship-to and month, net of credits, for the schedule's reagents.

  • Never maps a ship-to by itself
Pace forecaster

Works out pace, purchases to date and a forecast, and flags lanes behind pace.

  • Never contacts a lab
Clause checker

Applies affiliated sites, ramp, amendments, downtime, supply exclusions and credits at year end.

  • Never reads service calls or their problem text
  • Never chooses a remedy
Remedy drafter

Works out each remedy and drafts the documents in approved wording.

  • Never sends, waives or reduces a shortfall
Wording checker

Marks any typed sentence for commercial compliance to read.

  • Never approves text
Notice clock

Tracks the 60-day notice, the 30-day dispute window and the internal target.

  • Never extends a deadline

demoSample data, from the working solution.

What stays with contract and finance people at every year end

The agents work out the sums. Money and wording stay with named people.

Choosing the remedyThe contract manager chooses. Capital sales may recommend; it cannot prepare or sign.
Waiving a shortfallIt needs a written reason, the finance credit manager, commercial compliance and the finance director, in that order.
Words that reach a labStatements and pace notes use approved wording. A typed sentence waits for commercial compliance.
Holding supplyA lab's reagent orders are never put on hold over a true-up.
An amendment not yet checkedIt cannot drive a true-up until the analyst checks it and the contract manager approves the new commitment.

What contract and finance teams ask about equipment placement agreements

What is equipment placement agreement tracking?

An equipment placement agreement places an analyzer or capital system in a hospital in return for a yearly purchase commitment. Equipment placement agreement tracking paces each placement against that commitment and, at year end, works out the true-up the agreement allows.

Why not bill from the purchases file?

Because the clauses change the sum. Affiliated sites, ramp years, amendments that raise the commitment, downtime and supply exclusions and credits all move the shortfall, and the purchases file sees none of them.

Who decides between an invoice, a price change, an extension or a purchase?

The contract manager. The agents work out each remedy from its clause, and the finance credit manager signs after opening the purchase lines and every passage that changed the sum.

Does it judge whether a waiver is allowed?

No. A waiver needs a written reason and three approvals, including commercial compliance. Whether an arrangement fits any legal safe harbor is for counsel.

What does the laboratory see?

Its own agreements and purchases, and statements sent to it. Clause-adjusted figures and shortfalls appear only once a signed statement is sent, and the lab can dispute it in writing.

Does it read service calls about the analyzers?

No. Downtime counts only from the signed uptime statement, in hours. Service calls and their problem text are not read.

Send a year of placement agreements
and the purchases behind them.

We will pace each lane, read the clauses and show you which true-ups change.