Critical Spares Analysis demo
Long-lead spares weighed on the cost to keep against the cost of going without, in a single case that plant engineering and finance both sign. 1:29
What the demo shows
Decides which long-lead spares to hold, with a written case engineering and finance sign.
Agents read stock, work orders, repair records, drawings and open requests, work out the two futures with one fixed formula, find the same part under different numbers and write the case. An engineer reviews it. The site's maintenance manager and a finance partner sign, and a vice president above $1M. Agents never sign, withdraw or write anything down; purchasing acts.
Transcript
- Critical Spares Analysis decides which long-lead spares to hold.
- Finance wants to write off this rotor.
- $39,000 a year to hold it, against $3.6 million of expected loss.
- Agents check every train and open request.
- Three rotors, one body.
- Train three asks for a fourth that never pays, even at the high rate.
- Purchasing holds the request.
- The 2003 rotor gets a fresh runout.
- Andile sends the case.
- Gorin opens the failure count, the maker letter, the fresh runout, and the request, then signs the plant side.
- Rachel opens the ledger, the quote, the dealer note, and the request, and signs the money side.
- The requester agrees, and finance opens the policy and the ledger and rules the old rotor stays on the books.
- A vice president opens the records and signs last, with $2.4 million at stake.
- Purchasing, never an agent, withdraws the request.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens, and governance on one platform.
Transcribed from the film’s narration. Captions are on the player.