Course Evaluation Comment Analysis demo

What the demo shows

Deans and chairs get course-evaluation comments grouped by theme, quoted, with abuse removed

Agents remove student names and hold back sections under five responses, sort every comment into the course's pinned themes, pick two representative quotes per theme and term cited to the section, and line two terms up side by side. A Bias Filter holds comments about protected traits out of faculty files with a reason code, and a Faculty Affairs reviewer confirms every hold; a teaching point inside a held comment still counts. A comment that may describe harassment goes to the Title IX Coordinator, never to the filter. The instructor sees the same answer as the chair, and annual-review summaries follow the faculty agreement.

Transcript

1. 0:00Course Evaluation Comment Analysis gives chairs student comments by theme, quoted and cited.
2. 0:08One study flagged nearly seven percent of comments for a second look.
3. 0:14Biology chair Celia Marchetti asks about BIO 1010 labs since the redesign.
4. 0:23Agents remove names and sort both falls into the same five themes.
5. 0:30Lab instructions unclear falls from two hundred twelve mentions to forty-eight.
6. 0:37Every quote is cited to its section and opens in context.
7. 0:43Three comments were removed; two about the instructor's accent, held for bias.
8. 0:51Omar Lindqvist in Faculty Affairs confirms each hold, so no complaint is hidden.
9. 0:58The third describes unwanted contact by a TA, so it went to Title IX.
10. 1:04Dr. Adeyemi, the instructor, sees exactly what his chair sees.
11. 1:12Every question, hold and routing lands in the audit trail.
12. 1:18Seventy chairs get answers in minutes; a person reads every hold.
13. 1:24Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.

The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.