Arbitrator Selection Research video
Every candidate on the institution's list profiled side by side from published awards and their own writings, every disclosed relationship checked against both parties, and a strike-and-rank ballot with a source behind every rank. 1:18
What the film shows
Profiles candidate arbitrators from awards, rulings and writings, for arbitration counsel
Agents collect each candidate's awards and writings, read every award for the candidate's own role, place their stated views on the issues that decide the dispute, check every disclosed relationship against both parties, and propose a cited strike-and-rank ballot. The partner strikes, ranks and signs; conflicts counsel clears; the client approves the strikes.
Transcript
- Arbitrator Selection Research profiles candidate arbitrators from awards, rulings and writings, for arbitration counsel.
- The ICDR allows fifteen days to strike and rank a list; research runs on memory.
- Quillon faces a seventy-five million dollar claim; seven candidates are on the list.
- Agents read sixty-four awards and thirty-one articles, citing every value.
- Each candidate's own words are placed on the issues that decide this case.
- Every disclosure is checked against both parties; two candidates have ties to Vessant.
- Valentina strikes candidate two over a cited award; the ballot records her reason.
- The client approves both strikes in a footnoted memo.
- Valentina signs on day two of fifteen, a source behind every rank.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.