Academic Program Review demo
Five lenses per program, the self-study checked against the data, and options modeled before the provost decides 1:31
What the demo shows
Provosts join enrollment, cost, outcomes and job demand into a cited review per program
Five agents each build one lens of the program from its system of record (enrollment, cost per credit hour, completion, graduates' earnings and regional job demand), every figure cited to its source. A Critic agent tests each claim in the self-study against the data, a Peer agent compares the program with peers from public completions data, and a Scenario agent models grow, redesign, merge and teach out. The Provost sends one option to the committee, the committee chair approves the review, the Provost decides with a reason, and the faculty senate receives the full record.
Transcript
- Academic Program Review gives a provost one cited review per degree program.
- Twenty-seven of Halden State's one hundred ninety programs are in review this year.
- From July 2027, low graduate earnings can cost a program federal loans.
- Industrial Technology opens as five strips, each built by its own agent.
- Enrollment is down forty-one percent, a credit hour costs six-twelve, yet postings are up twenty-two percent.
- The Critic agent checks the self-study's claim of strong job placement.
- The survey behind it: an eighteen percent response rate. Seven graduates.
- The Scenario agent models a merger with engineering technology: every current student finishes.
- The Provost sends it to the committee; its chair approves before she decides.
- Every figure and signature is in the audit trail, ready to export.
- A review takes two days, not six weeks, and the merger saves an estimated one point three million a year.
- Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.
The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.