Academic Integrity Case Management demo

What the demo shows

Integrity offices build case files from drafts, version history and rubric evidence for panels

A Referral agent guides the instructor's referral and attaches the course items. An Evidence agent assembles the allegation file while a Defense-view agent builds the student's side at the same time, from earlier drafts, the revision history the student consents to share, writing-center visits and office hours. A Writing-process agent replays how the text grew, session by session. A Fairness agent refuses detector scores as evidence and flags language that could penalize non-native writers, and a Consistency agent compares any proposed sanction with past cases of the same type and level. The officer decides whether a case goes to a panel, the panel decides responsibility, the Director confirms every notice and any sanction above a grade penalty, and the student sees the same packet.

Transcript

1. 0:00Academic Integrity Case Management builds fair case files for integrity offices and hearing panels.
2. 0:09In one study, detectors flagged 61 percent of non-native English essays as AI-written.
3. 0:19This essay arrived as one paste: 1,412 words at 11:58 p.m.
4. 0:27The Fairness agent left the detector score out, and flagged biased wording about her English.
5. 0:33With her consent, the scrubber replays her draft: fourteen sessions from September 21, and two small pastes.
6. 0:45The Defense-view agent adds a writing center visit and her graded outline.
7. 0:52The Consistency agent finds 21 of 23 like referrals dismissed at screening.
8. 1:00Officer Celeste Nakagawa dismisses before panel, with her reason on the record.
9. 1:06The Director confirms the notice; nothing reaches the transcript; every view is logged.
10. 1:16The result: screened within five days, and no detector score used as evidence.
11. 1:23Built on Botminds: agents, data, screens and governance on one platform.

The narration as written for the film. Captions are on the player.